NCT01205295

Brief Summary

Background: Previous studies have shown that anxiety and dissatisfaction with patient progress are predictors for increased postoperative pain and reduced impact and efficacy of pain treatment. However, it remains to be shown whether patient anxiety and concern are predictors for the perceived quality of patient progress and the perceived efficacy of treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate whether there is a correlation between preoperative anxiety and concern, and the perceived quality and efficacy of postoperative treatment. The hypothesis is that anxious and concerned patients are less satisfied with treatment and have a poorer response of their treatment. Methods/design: This PhD-project consists of four coherent studies. 1) A methodological study evaluating the CMD-SQ (Common Mental Disorder - Screening Questionnaire) questionnaire by a test-retest study. 2) The main study, a prospective follow-up study, has the aim of investigating the correlation between patient anxiety and concern, their perceived quality of patient progress and the perceived efficacy of treatment. This correlation will be detected by means of five questionnaires: CMD-SQ, EQ-5D, SF-12, HVOK, OHS or OSS. 3) A study consisting of an explicit internal medical audit with the aim to investigate whether the medical assessment of patient efficacy of treatment is consistent with their own self-reported efficacy of treatment. 4) An intervention study designed as a randomized clinical trial. The aim is to investigate whether a targeted effort towards patients with a high score of CMD-SQ, i.e. patients with anxiety and concern, can increase their self-reported efficacies of treatment and their perceived quality of progress. A total of 800 hip- and shoulder-patients will be included. Discussion: If a correlation between patient anxiety and concern, their perceived quality of progress and the perceived efficacy of treatment is found, it will be relevant to screen all hip- and shoulder-patients for anxiety and concern preoperatively and deal with this before their operation. This study will provide a proposition of how these patients can be taken care of through cognitive behavioural therapy as a targeted effort towards their anxiety and concern. Aim and hypothesis: The aim of this study is to investigate whether there is a correlation between patient anxiety and concern, and their perceived quality and efficacy of treatment. The overall hypothesis is that patients who are anxious and concerned are less satisfied with their treatment and have a poorer overall efficacy of their treatment.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
800

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2010

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2010

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2010

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 20, 2010

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

June 23, 2011

Status Verified

September 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

September 13, 2010

Last Update Submit

June 22, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

hipshouldermental disordersanxietyconcernefficacy of treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Mental disorders.

    CMD-SQ contains 38 items and was prepared as a tool for general practitioners to increase the focus on patient anxiety and concern. The questionnaire was translated into Danish and then validated without the test-retest. CMD-SQ consists of the following six subscales, each of them has been validated: SCL-AS, Whiteley-7, SCL-ANX4, SCL-8, SCL-DEF6 and CAGE. The patients respond on a Likert scale. A normal score is lower than four in the SCL-AS scale and no more than two in the remaining scales. A manual for assessing and validating the score of CMD-SQ is available.

    Baseline(preoperative)

  • Quality of life

    EQ-5D is designed to assess the quality of life with no reference to a specific diagnosis. The questionnaire has been translated into Danish and validated. The scale includes five broad areas and a visual analogue scale. The self-reported health situation is reported on a scale from 0 to 100. The score 100 corresponds to the best self-reported health situation.

    Baseline (preoperative)

  • Self-reported health perception

    SF-12 is an internationally and nationally validated questionnaire that evaluates patients' self-reported health perception. SF-12 is an abbreviated version of SF-36 and it contains 12 items, which are divided into physical and mental items. The patients respond on a Likert scale.

    Baseline (preoperative)

  • Function of the shoulder

    The UK questionnaire Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) are initially and similar, but related to two different categories of patients, namely shoulder - operated patients. The questionnaires are compiled in Oxford. Each questionnaire contains 12 items. The OSS has been translated into Danish and validated. The patients respond on a Likert scale from 1 - 5. The calculated scores can be between 12 and 60 points. 12 points reflects the best possible effect of treatment, and a score above 36 is categorized as an expression of a poor patient-assessed efficacy of treatment.

    Baseline (preoperative)

  • Function of the hip

    The UK questionnaires Oxford Hip Score (OHS) are initially and similar, but related to two different categories of patients, namely THA operated patients. The questionnaires are compiled in Oxford. Each questionnaire contains 12 items. The OHS has been translated into Danish and is undergoing a validation process in a parallel project. The patients respond on a Likert scale from 1 - 5. The calculated scores can be between 12 and 60 points.

    Baseline (preoperative)

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Satisfaction with treatment

    3 day postoperative

  • Mental disorders.

    3 months postoperative

  • Quality of life

    3 months postoperative

  • Self-reported health perception

    3 months postoperative

  • Function of the shoulder

    3 months postoperative

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Mental disorders

Preoperative and postoperative screening of mental disorders and efficacy of treatment in hip and shoulder patient.

Other: Cognitive behavioural therapy

Interventions

Cognitive behavioural therapy Psychologist Preoperative Efficacy of treatment

Also known as: Psychologist, Preoperative, Efficacy of treatment, Hip, Shoulder
Mental disorders

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Hip and shoulder patients from the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kolding Hospital, a part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Denmark and Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

You may qualify if:

  • All hip- and shoulder-patients, who are referred for the first time to the Outpatient Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Kolding Hospital, a part of Lillebaelt Hospital and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Denmark are included.
  • The patients must be able to speak and read Danish and must be at least 18 years old.
  • To be included, they must enter a patient programme that implies an operation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with cancer or who are registered as terminal are excluded.
  • Patients who have experienced a trauma within the past four weeks and those with a psychotic diagnosis are excluded, e.g. severe mental disorders such as schizophrenia, paranoid psychosis and bipolar affective disorders (DSM IV, F 20-29, F 30, 31).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital

Odense, Odense, 5000, Denmark

RECRUITING

Related Publications (2)

  • Bilberg R, Norgaard B, Roessler KK, Overgaard S. Test-retest reliability of Common Mental Disorders Questionnaire (CMDQ) in patients with total hip replacement (THR). BMC Psychol. 2014 Sep 8;2(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40359-014-0032-5. eCollection 2014.

  • Bilberg R, Norgaard B, Overgaard S, Roessler KK. Patient anxiety and concern as predictors for the perceived quality of treatment and patient reported outcome (PRO) in orthopaedic surgery. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 8;12:244. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-244.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anxiety DisordersMental Disorders

Interventions

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPapaverine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesBenzylisoquinolinesAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsOpiate AlkaloidsIsoquinolinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring

Study Officials

  • Randi M Bilberg, Ph.d. stud.

    Kolding Sygehus

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Randi Bilberg M Bilberg, Ph.d. Stud.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2010

First Posted

September 20, 2010

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion

February 1, 2013

Study Completion

February 1, 2013

Last Updated

June 23, 2011

Record last verified: 2010-09

Locations