NCT01201564

Brief Summary

This study is designed to compare two techniques for operative care of umbilical hernia in adults regarding wound complications, wound side fluid collections, recurrence rate, postoperative pain, duration of hospitalization and quality of life. The IPOM technique provides mesh positioning directly into the abdominal cavity onto the defect under laparoscopic control while in sublay position the mesh is placed directly behind the rectus muscle after small incision close to the belly button.

Trial Health

60
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
306

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2010

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
2 countries

3 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2010

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 19, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 14, 2010

Completed
8.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

May 7, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

8.4 years

First QC Date

July 19, 2010

Last Update Submit

May 6, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

umbilical hernia,wound complications,mesh repair, IPOM,quality of life,sublay mesh repair,recurrence rate

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • early wound complications

    * wound infection (with or without removal of the mesh) * wound necrosis * wound hematoma

    30 days after operation

  • late wound complications

    * wound infection (with or without removal of the mesh) * wound necrosis * wound hematoma

    1 year after operation

Secondary Outcomes (20)

  • complication rate perioperative

    intraoperative complications will be recorded immediately after finishing the operation

  • duration of operation

    the duration will be recorded immediately after finishing the operation

  • hospital stay

    will be measured after discharge of the patient

  • umbilical hernia recurrence rate

    30 days

  • umbilical hernia recurrence rate

    1 year

  • +15 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair

sublay mesh repair

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: sublay mesh repair

Interventions

The IPOM technique provides mesh positioning directly into the abdominal cavity onto the defect under laparoscopic control while in sublay position the mesh is placed directly behind des rectus muscle after small incision close to the belly button.

intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair

The IPOM technique provides mesh positioning directly into the abdominal cavity onto the defect under laparoscopic control while in sublay position the mesh is placed directly behind des rectus muscle after small incision close to the belly button.

sublay mesh repair

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • informed consent
  • patient age: ≥ 18 years
  • elective surgery for umbilical hernia
  • hernia diameter ≥ 1cm

You may not qualify if:

  • previous history of median laparotomy
  • navel site infection
  • contraindication for general anaesthesia
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score \>IV
  • pregnancy
  • cirrhosis of the liver (CHILD B and C) and/or ascites
  • cytostatic therapy
  • incarcerated hernia
  • recurrent hernia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg (Wuemme) gGmbH

Rotenburg (Wümme), Lower Saxony, 27356, Germany

Location

University Hospital Basel

Basel, 4031, Switzerland

Location

Luzerner Kantonsspital

Lucerne, 6000, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Benhidjeb T, Benecke C, Strik MW. [Incisional hernia repair: sublay or intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)?]. Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Sep;133(5):458-63. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1076954. Epub 2008 Oct 15. German.

    PMID: 18924044BACKGROUND
  • Lau H, Patil NG. Umbilical hernia in adults. Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):2016-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9027-7. Epub 2003 Oct 28.

    PMID: 14574545BACKGROUND
  • Mayo WJ. VI. An Operation for the Radical Cure of Umbilical Hernia. Ann Surg. 1901 Aug;34(2):276-80. doi: 10.1097/00000658-190107000-00021. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17861015BACKGROUND
  • Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 10;343(6):392-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008103430603.

    PMID: 10933738BACKGROUND
  • Venclauskas L, Silanskaite J, Kiudelis M. Umbilical hernia: factors indicative of recurrence. Medicina (Kaunas). 2008;44(11):855-9.

    PMID: 19124962BACKGROUND
  • Hilling DE, Koppert LB, Keijzer R, Stassen LP, Oei IH. Laparoscopic correction of umbilical hernias using a transabdominal preperitoneal approach: results of a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2009 Aug;23(8):1740-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0177-5. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

    PMID: 19015918BACKGROUND
  • Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS, Okrainec A. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg. 2009 Aug;96(8):851-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6668.

    PMID: 19591158BACKGROUND
  • Bullinger M. [Assessment of health related quality of life with the SF-36 Health Survey]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1996 Aug;35(3):XVII-XXVII; quiz XXVII-XXIX. German.

    PMID: 8975342BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Umbilical

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Infant, Newborn, DiseasesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesHernia, VentralHernia, AbdominalHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Daniel Oertli, Professor

    Departement of General Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Oleg Heizmann, MD

    Departement of General,- Visceral- and Thoracic Surgery, Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg (Wuemme), Germany

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Daniel Matz, MD

    Departement of General,- Visceral- and Thoracic Surgery, Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg (Wuemme), Germany

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2010

First Posted

September 14, 2010

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion

December 1, 2018

Study Completion

December 1, 2018

Last Updated

May 7, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05

Locations