Study Stopped
Recruiting problems
Comparative Study Matching Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) and Sublay Mesh to Treat Umbilical Hernia
Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial Comparing Laparoscopic (IPOM) vs. Sublay Mesh Plasty for Umbilical Hernia in Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
306
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
This study is designed to compare two techniques for operative care of umbilical hernia in adults regarding wound complications, wound side fluid collections, recurrence rate, postoperative pain, duration of hospitalization and quality of life. The IPOM technique provides mesh positioning directly into the abdominal cavity onto the defect under laparoscopic control while in sublay position the mesh is placed directly behind the rectus muscle after small incision close to the belly button.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jul 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_4
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedMay 7, 2019
May 1, 2019
8.4 years
July 19, 2010
May 6, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
early wound complications
* wound infection (with or without removal of the mesh) * wound necrosis * wound hematoma
30 days after operation
late wound complications
* wound infection (with or without removal of the mesh) * wound necrosis * wound hematoma
1 year after operation
Secondary Outcomes (20)
complication rate perioperative
intraoperative complications will be recorded immediately after finishing the operation
duration of operation
the duration will be recorded immediately after finishing the operation
hospital stay
will be measured after discharge of the patient
umbilical hernia recurrence rate
30 days
umbilical hernia recurrence rate
1 year
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair
ACTIVE COMPARATORsublay mesh repair
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The IPOM technique provides mesh positioning directly into the abdominal cavity onto the defect under laparoscopic control while in sublay position the mesh is placed directly behind des rectus muscle after small incision close to the belly button.
The IPOM technique provides mesh positioning directly into the abdominal cavity onto the defect under laparoscopic control while in sublay position the mesh is placed directly behind des rectus muscle after small incision close to the belly button.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- informed consent
- patient age: ≥ 18 years
- elective surgery for umbilical hernia
- hernia diameter ≥ 1cm
You may not qualify if:
- previous history of median laparotomy
- navel site infection
- contraindication for general anaesthesia
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score \>IV
- pregnancy
- cirrhosis of the liver (CHILD B and C) and/or ascites
- cytostatic therapy
- incarcerated hernia
- recurrent hernia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg (Wuemme) gGmbH
Rotenburg (Wümme), Lower Saxony, 27356, Germany
University Hospital Basel
Basel, 4031, Switzerland
Luzerner Kantonsspital
Lucerne, 6000, Switzerland
Related Publications (8)
Benhidjeb T, Benecke C, Strik MW. [Incisional hernia repair: sublay or intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)?]. Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Sep;133(5):458-63. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1076954. Epub 2008 Oct 15. German.
PMID: 18924044BACKGROUNDLau H, Patil NG. Umbilical hernia in adults. Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):2016-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9027-7. Epub 2003 Oct 28.
PMID: 14574545BACKGROUNDMayo WJ. VI. An Operation for the Radical Cure of Umbilical Hernia. Ann Surg. 1901 Aug;34(2):276-80. doi: 10.1097/00000658-190107000-00021. No abstract available.
PMID: 17861015BACKGROUNDLuijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 10;343(6):392-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008103430603.
PMID: 10933738BACKGROUNDVenclauskas L, Silanskaite J, Kiudelis M. Umbilical hernia: factors indicative of recurrence. Medicina (Kaunas). 2008;44(11):855-9.
PMID: 19124962BACKGROUNDHilling DE, Koppert LB, Keijzer R, Stassen LP, Oei IH. Laparoscopic correction of umbilical hernias using a transabdominal preperitoneal approach: results of a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2009 Aug;23(8):1740-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0177-5. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
PMID: 19015918BACKGROUNDForbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS, Okrainec A. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg. 2009 Aug;96(8):851-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6668.
PMID: 19591158BACKGROUNDBullinger M. [Assessment of health related quality of life with the SF-36 Health Survey]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1996 Aug;35(3):XVII-XXVII; quiz XXVII-XXIX. German.
PMID: 8975342BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Daniel Oertli, Professor
Departement of General Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Oleg Heizmann, MD
Departement of General,- Visceral- and Thoracic Surgery, Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg (Wuemme), Germany
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Matz, MD
Departement of General,- Visceral- and Thoracic Surgery, Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg (Wuemme), Germany
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2010
First Posted
September 14, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 7, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05