Evaluation of Anxiolysis and Pain Associated With Retrobulbar Eye Block for Cataract Surgery : Melatonin Versus Gabapentin
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Principle goals of sedation for eye surgery are to provide patient comfort and to allow the patient to stay calm during both retrobulbar injection and surgery. Insufficient sedation may not prevent the patient from moving during retrobulbar injection, whereas very deep sedation may result in respiratory complications during surgery .The investigators compared the effect of melatonin and gabapentin on the hemodynamic parameters, sedation ,anxiety, and pain and satisfaction profile in cataract surgery. After approval by the Hospital Evaluation Committee of Scientific Studies for ethical purpose and written informed consent, ninety patients scheduled for cataract surgery by phacoemulsification were randomly allocated to three study groups to receive melatonin 6 mg (Group M, n = 30) , gabapentin 600mg(GroupG, n = 30)or placebo(GroupP, n=30) 90 minutes before retrobulbar injection. . Hemodynamic parameters ,anxiety, sedation score , and pain during block and surgery, satisfaction of surgeon were assessed. . At the preoperative visit verbal pain score (VPS) of 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable) and verbal anxiety score (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 (0= completely calm, 10 = the worst possible anxiety) were explained to patients. Then a 20 gauge cannula was inserted into one of the two hands. Patients were monitored with electrocardiogram, noninvasive measurement of blood pressure, and pulse oximetry (SPO2). Retrobulbar nerve block was performed by the same ophthalmic surgeon who was unaware of group allocation with 1.5 ml of solution that prepared by nurse( lidocaine 2%and 0.5 ml bupivacaine) via the percutaneous route with a 25 G, 38 mm Atkinson needle (John Weiss \& Son Limited, Milton Keynes,England), at inferotemporal site. No patient received an additional facial nerve block. The investigators assessed the pain immediately after block and surgery. Anxiety score and pain score was recorded in each patient before premedication (T1), ninety minutes after premedication, on arrival in the operating room (T2), one minute after retrobulbar block placement (T3)during the operation period) (T4) and postoperatively before discharging the patient from the recovery room (T5) .At the end of surgery, the patients were asked about average level of their anxiety and pain during the operation period according to the VAS and VPS explained to them before premedication.'. The surgeon was also asked to verbally rate their level of satisfaction according to three degree scale as "very bad, , moderate, good after the operation. The sedation level of patients during performance of block was assessed as Sedation scores were obtained on a 3 point scale with 0 =movements of the head, arms and trunk ,1 =slightly movement of arms,2=slightly change in face,3=complete calm. If sedation was inadequate, fentanyl could be given 0.5microgram/kg as needed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 anxiety
Started Sep 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_1 anxiety
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 13, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedOctober 11, 2012
October 1, 2012
3 months
September 10, 2010
October 10, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
pain will be assessed by verbal pain score (VPS) of 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable)
one minute after retrobulbar block placement
pain will be assessed by verbal pain score (VPS) of 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable)
At the end of surgery the patients were asked about average level of their pain during the operation period according to the VPS explained to them before premedication)
pain will be assessed by verbal pain score (VPS) of 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable)
postoperatively before discharging the patient from the recovery room
anxiety will be assessed by verbal anxiety score (VAS) of 10 (0 = completely calm and 10 = the worst possible anxiety)
At the end of surgery the patients were asked about average level of their pain during the operation period according to the VPS explained to them before premedication)
anxiety will be assessed by verbal anxiety score (VAS) of 10 (0 = completely calm and 10 = the worst possible anxiety)
one minute after retrobulbar block placement
anxiety will be assessed by verbal anxiety score (VAS) of 10 (0 = completely calm and 10 = the worst possible anxiety)
postoperatively before discharging the patient from the recovery room
Secondary Outcomes (12)
mean arterial blood pressure will be assessed by noninvasive automatic blood pressure measurement
before premedication
mean arterial blood pressure will be assessed by noninvasive automatic blood pressure measurement
ninety minutes after premedication, on arrival in the operating room
mean arterial blood pressure will be assessed by noninvasive automatic blood pressure measurement
one minute after retrobulbar block placement
mean arterial blood pressure will be assessed by noninvasive automatic blood pressure measurement
during the operation period(five minutes after beginning of surgery
mean arterial blood pressure will be assessed by noninvasive automatic blood pressure measurement
postoperatively before discharge the patient from the recovery room
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
melatonin
ACTIVE COMPARATORninety patients scheduled for cataract surgery by phacoemulsification were randomly allocated to three study groups to receive melatonin 6 mg (Group M, n = 30) , gabapentin 600mg(GroupG, n = 30)or placebo(GroupP, n=30) orally 90 minutes before retrobulbar injection( for all of three groups).
gabapentin
ACTIVE COMPARATORninety patients scheduled for cataract surgery by phacoemulsification were randomly allocated to three study groups to receive melatonin 6 mg (Group M, n = 30) , gabapentin 600mg(GroupG, n = 30)or placebo(GroupP, n=30) orally 90 minutes before retrobulbar injection( for all of three groups).
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORninety patients scheduled for cataract surgery by phacoemulsification were randomly allocated to three study groups to receive melatonin 6 mg (Group M, n = 30) , gabapentin 600mg(GroupG, n = 30)or placebo(GroupP, n=30) orally 90 minutes before retrobulbar injection( for all of three groups).
Interventions
ninety patients scheduled for cataract surgery by phacoemulsification were randomly allocated to three study groups to receive melatonin 6 mg (Group M, n = 30) , gabapentin 600mg(GroupG, n = 30)or placebo(GroupP, n=30) orally 90 minutes before retrobulbar injection( for all of three groups).
ninety patients scheduled for cataract surgery by phacoemulsification were randomly allocated to three study groups to receive melatonin 6 mg (Group M, n = 30) , gabapentin 600mg(GroupG, n = 30)or placebo(GroupP, n=30) orally 90 minutes before retrobulbar injection( for all of three groups).
ninety patients scheduled for cataract surgery by phacoemulsification were randomly allocated to three study groups to receive melatonin 6 mg (Group M, n = 30) , gabapentin 600mg(GroupG, n = 30)or placebo(GroupP, n=30) orally 90 minutes before retrobulbar injection( for all of three groups).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients who were aged 25 years or older, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with ASA status IV
- history of hepatic or renal disease, confusion, dementia
- communication difficulty resulting from deafness or language barrier
- chronic use of narcotics, barbiturates or psychotropic medications
- history of allergy or contraindications to any of the study drugs
- visual impairment of the non operative eye
- weight \< 40 kg or \> 100 kg
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Qazvin university of medical science
Qazvin, Qazvin Province, 34197/59811, Iran
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Qazvin University Of Medical Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2010
First Posted
September 13, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
October 11, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-10