NCT01197794

Brief Summary

The study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of AZD1981 compared to non-active compound in asthmatic patients.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Strong global presence with extensive site network
Enrollment
1,144

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2010

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
10 countries

105 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 8, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 9, 2010

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2010

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2012

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 10, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

November 6, 2013

Status Verified

October 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

September 8, 2010

Results QC Date

July 1, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 11, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Efficacysafetytolerabilitydose findingasthma patients

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 at the Clinic

    Change from baseline: treatment period average minus baseline. Treatment period average defined as the mean of all available data during randomized treatment that occurred on or prior to treatment failure. Treatment failure defined as worsening asthma symptoms resulting in increased dose of inhaled corticosteroid.

    Twelve week treatment period

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Morning and Evening PEF

    Twelve week treatment period

  • Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item (ACQ5)

    Twelve week treatment period

  • Adverse Events

    Twelve week treatment period

  • Number of Participants With at Least One Severe Asthma Exacerbation

    Twelve week treatment period

  • Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Failure

    Twelve week treatment period

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (7)

AZD1981 10 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

AZD1981 10 mg

Drug: AZD1981

AZD1981 40 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

AZD1981 40 mg

Drug: AZD1981

AZD1981 100 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

AZD1981 100 mg

Drug: AZD1981

AZD1981 400 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

AZD1981 400 mg

Drug: AZD1981

AZD1981 80 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

AZD1981 80 mg

Drug: AZD1981

AZD1981 200 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

AZD1981 200 mg

Drug: AZD1981

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Drug: Placebo

Interventions

AZD1981 twice daily

AZD1981 10 mgAZD1981 100 mgAZD1981 40 mgAZD1981 400 mg

Placebo to match AZD1981

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men and women. Women must be surgically sterilized/postmenopausal or use double barrier method contraception
  • months history of asthma according to ATS definition
  • Prescribed daily dose of ICS and LABA for at least 3 months prior to Visit 2
  • Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of 40 to 85 % of predicted normal
  • A total ACQ5 score of 1.5 or more

You may not qualify if:

  • Respiratory infection significantly affecting the asthma
  • Any significant disease and disorder that may put the patient at risk or influence study results
  • Any clinically relevant abnormal findings
  • A smoking history of more than 10 pack years
  • Intake of oral, rectal or parenteral glucocorticosteroids

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (105)

Research Site

Fullerton, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Rolling Hills Estates, California, United States

Location

Research Site

San Diego, California, United States

Location

Research Site

San Jose, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Wheaton, Maryland, United States

Location

Research Site

North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Research Site

Bellevue, Nebraska, United States

Location

Research Site

Sylvania, Ohio, United States

Location

Research Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Research Site

Medford, Oregon, United States

Location

Research Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Location

Research Site

Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Research Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Research Site

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Location

Research Site

Clinton, South Carolina, United States

Location

Research Site

Waco, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Location

Research Site

Buenos Aires, Argentina, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Mendoza, Mendoza Province, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Location

Research Site

San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Porto Alegre, Brasil, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Florian Polis, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil

Location

Research Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Yanagawa, Fukuoka, Japan

Location

Research Site

Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan

Location

Research Site

Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

Research Site

Chitose, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

Research Site

Kitahiroshima, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

Research Site

Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

Research Site

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

Research Site

Tomakomai, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

Research Site

Himeji, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Naka-gun, Ibaraki, Japan

Location

Research Site

Sakaidechō, Kagawa-ken, Japan

Location

Research Site

Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, Japan

Location

Research Site

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Location

Research Site

Kochi, Kochi, Japan

Location

Research Site

Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan

Location

Research Site

Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan

Location

Research Site

Beppu, Oita Prefecture, Japan

Location

Research Site

Ōita, Oita Prefecture, Japan

Location

Research Site

Kurashiki-shi, Okayama-ken, Japan

Location

Research Site

Matsue, Shimane, Japan

Location

Research Site

Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Chūō, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Nakano-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Ohota-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Research Site

México, D.f., Mexico

Location

Research Site

Tijuana, Estado de Baja California, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Guadalajara, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Constanța, Constanța County, Romania

Location

Research Site

Brasov, Romania

Location

Research Site

Bucharest, Romania

Location

Research Site

Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Location

Research Site

Iași, Romania

Location

Research Site

Tg. Mures, Romania

Location

Research Site

Moscow, Russia, Russia

Location

Research Site

Yekaterinburg, Russia, Russia

Location

Research Site

Novosibirsk, Russia

Location

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Research Site

Vladikavkaz, Russia

Location

Research Site

Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Bardejov, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Bratislava, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Dunajská Streda, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Hnúšťa, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Komárno, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Košice, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Levice, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Liptovský Hrádok, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Liptovský Mikuláš, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Prešov, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Rimavská Sobota, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Ružomberok, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Trenčín, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Zvolen, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Lyttleton, Centurion, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Cape Town, South Africa, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Durban, South Africa, South Africa

Location

Research Site

eMkhomazi, South Africa, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Durbanville, South Africa

Location

Research Site

eManzimtoti, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Pretoria, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Donetsk, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Kyiv, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Odesa, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Poltava, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Vinytsa, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bateman ED, O'Brien C, Rugman P, Luke S, Ivanov S, Uddin M. Efficacy and safety of the CRTh2 antagonist AZD1981 as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists in patients with atopic asthma. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018 May 4;12:1093-1106. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S147389. eCollection 2018.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

AZD1981

Results Point of Contact

Title
Alison Holt
Organization
AstraZeneca

Study Officials

  • Chris O'Brien, MD

    AstraZeneca

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2010

First Posted

September 9, 2010

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion

February 1, 2012

Study Completion

February 1, 2012

Last Updated

November 6, 2013

Results First Posted

September 10, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-10

Locations