Standard Surgery or Minimal-Access Surgery in Treating Patients With Bladder Cancer
Bladder Cancer: Open Versus Laparoscopic or Robotic Cystectomy. A Study to Determine the Feasibility of Randomization to Open Versus Minimal Access Cystectomy in Patients With Bladder Cancer.
6 other identifiers
interventional
92
1 country
4
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Minimal-access surgery uses a smaller opening in the body to remove the tumor than is used in standard surgery. It is not yet known whether minimal-access surgery to remove the bladder is more effective than standard surgery to remove the bladder in treating patients with bladder cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying standard surgery to see how well it works compared with minimal-access surgery in treating patients with bladder cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 8, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedApril 1, 2011
September 1, 2010
1.9 years
September 4, 2010
March 31, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of patients who consent to be randomized
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Potential barriers to randomization via semistructured qualitative interviews with patients who consent to registration and do not accept randomization
Potential factors relating to non-registration of patients who are eligible for inclusion but have not been registered based on review of anonymous screening logs
Safety and efficacy
Quality of life data measuring return to normal activities (physical, social, and occupational)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, England, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
Guy's Hospital
London, England, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
University College of London Hospitals
London, England, WC1E 6AU, United Kingdom
Wales Cancer Trials Unit
Cardiff, Wales, CF11 9LJ, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Kelly, MD
University College London Hospitals
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2010
First Posted
September 8, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
April 1, 2011
Record last verified: 2010-09