Safety/Efficacy Study of Subcutaneously Injected Prandial Insulins Compared to Insulin Lispro Alone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
A Phase II, Randomized, Double Blind, 2-Way Crossover Safety and Efficacy Study of Subcutaneously Injected Prandial Insulins: Lispro-PH20 or Aspart-PH20 Compared to Insulin Lispro (Humalog®) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
1 other identifier
interventional
132
1 country
22
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study was to compare Humalog (insulin lispro)-recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) or Novolog (insulin aspart)-rHuPH20 to insulin lispro for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in basal-bolus therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Aug 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
22 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 2, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 20, 2014
CompletedAugust 20, 2014
August 1, 2014
1 year
August 31, 2010
August 1, 2014
August 1, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) at the End of Each Treatment Period
Change in glycosylated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) from baseline (Week 0) to end of treatment period (Week 12 and Week 24) is presented. Data are presented by combined treatment group (Lispro-recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (PH20) + Aspart-PH20 = Analog-PH20) and combined comparator drug (Insulin lispro from both groups). Least squares (LS) means were calculated from linear contrasts of mixed effects linear models with treatment (Lispro, Aspart), PH20 (yes, no), and treatment sequence as fixed effects and participant within treatment sequence as a random effect.
Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Mean Daily Insulin Dose as Recorded During 10-Point Glucose Monitoring
Week 10 and Week 22
Percentage of Participants Meeting Glucose Targets at Least 2/3 of the Time
Baseline through Week 24, excluding 10-point glucose monitoring days
Rates of Hypoglycemia at the End of Each Treatment Period
Week 12 and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at the End of Each Treatment Period
Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24
Mean Daily PPG Excursions
Week 10 and Week 22
Study Arms (2)
Lispro-PH20/Insulin lispro
EXPERIMENTALAll enrolled participants underwent a titration period of 4 to 6 weeks in which they received 100 units per milliliter (U/mL) insulin glulisine, injected subcutaneously (SC), pre-meals, with doses titrated to each participant individually. Next, participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study treatments (Treatment A or B) for the first of two, 3-month treatment cycles. Each participant then received the second treatment for the second cycle. Lispro-PH20 (Treatment A): 100 U/mL insulin lispro with 5.0 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL) recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) (combined: Lispro-PH20), injected SC, pre-meals, with doses titrated to each participant individually. Insulin Lispro (Treatment B): 100 U/mL insulin lispro, injected SC, pre-meals, with doses titrated to each participant individually. Throughout the study, participants requiring basal insulin used twice daily SC injections of 100 U/mL insulin glargine.
Aspart-PH20/Insulin Lispro
EXPERIMENTALAll enrolled participants underwent a titration period of 4 to 6 weeks in which they received 100 U/mL insulin glulisine, injected SC, pre-meals, with doses titrated to each participant individually. Next participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study treatments (Treatment A or B) for the first of two, 3-month treatment cycles. Each participant then received the second treatment for the second cycle. Aspart-PH20 (Treatment A): 100 U/mL insulin aspart with 5.0 µg/mL rHuPH20 (combined: Aspart-PH20), injected SC, pre-meals, with doses titrated to each participant individually. Insulin lispro (Treatment B): 100 U/mL insulin lispro, injected SC, pre-meals, with doses titrated to each participant individually. Throughout the study, participants requiring basal insulin used twice daily SC injections of 100 U/mL insulin glargine.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males or females ≥18 years
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with insulin ≥12 months and prandial insulin (at least 2 meals per day) for ≥2 months
- Body mass index (BMI) of 23.0 to 45.0 kilograms per meter squared (kg/m\^2)
- Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level 7.0 to 8.5%, inclusive
- Fasting C-peptide \<0.6 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
- Willingness to use insulin glargine twice a day as basal insulin for the duration of the study
- Willingness to avoid use of an insulin infusion pump or unblinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during the study
You may not qualify if:
- Known or suspected allergy to any component of any of the study drugs
- Exclusive use of pre-mixed insulins
- Use of pramlintide, exenatide, and/or liraglutide within 30 days of screening
- Use of sulfonylureas within two months of screening
- Use of drugs (such as corticosteroids or antimetabolites) that could interfere with the interpretation of study results or are known to cause clinically relevant interference with insulin action, glucose utilization, or recovery from hypoglycemia, during the study or within 30 days of screening
- Recurrent severe hypoglycemia (more than 2 episodes over the last 6 months) or hypoglycemic unawareness, as judged by the investigator
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (22)
John Muir Physician Network Clinical Research Center
Concord, California, 94520, United States
Medical Group of Encino
Encino, California, 91436, United States
AMCR Institute, Inc.
Escondido, California, 92026, United States
Marin Endocrine Care and Research
Greenbrae, California, 94904, United States
Mills-Peninsula Health Services
San Mateo, California, 94401, United States
Center for Diabetes and Endocrine Care
Hollywood, Florida, 33021, United States
Diabetes Research Institute
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Baptist Diabetes Associates
Miami, Florida, 33156, United States
Rocky Mountain Diabetes and Osteoporosis Center
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404, United States
Mid-America Diabetes Associates
Wichita, Kansas, 67211, United States
Tulane University Health Sciences Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Medstar Research Institute
Hyattsville, Maryland, 20782, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
International Diabetes Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416, United States
Mercury Street Medical
Butte, Montana, 59701, United States
Desert Endocrinology
Henderson, Nevada, 89052, United States
Diabetes and Endocrinology Associates, PC
Rudd, North Carolina, 28557, United States
UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Texas Diabetes and Endocrinology
Round Rock, Texas, 78681, United States
Cetero Research-San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
West Olympia Internal Medicine
Olympia, Washington, 98502, United States
University of Washington School of Medicine
Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Vice President, Endocrinology Clinical Development
- Organization
- Halozyme Therapeutics
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Douglas Muchmore, M.D.
Halozyme Therapeutics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2010
First Posted
September 2, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
August 1, 2011
Study Completion
August 1, 2011
Last Updated
August 20, 2014
Results First Posted
August 20, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08