NCT01193998

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a validated diagnostic prediction model in the appropriate diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure (AHF) in patients presenting at the emergency department with undifferentiated dyspnea.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
186

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2010

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
3 countries

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 2, 2010

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

June 16, 2014

Status Verified

June 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

September 1, 2010

Last Update Submit

June 12, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparison of diagnostic model versus clinical judgment in appropriate diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure in dyspneic emergency department patients

    60 days after patient presentation to the emergency department

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Determine if use of the diagnostic prediction model leads to cost savings and better health outcomes

    From randomization until 60 days after patient presentation to the emergency department

Study Arms (2)

Clinician exposed to Model result

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Treatment as per model probability

Clinician blinded to Model result

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Treatment as per usual care

Interventions

Patients randomized to the arm where the clinician is exposed to the model results should be treated as per the model probability (i.e. if the model probability suggests AHF the clinician should treat for AHF).

Clinician exposed to Model result

Patients randomized to the arm where the clinician is blinded to the model results will undergo diagnostic tests and receive treatment as per the clinician's judgment and usual care standards.

Clinician blinded to Model result

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Presentation to the ED with undifferentiated shortness of breath

You may not qualify if:

  • Dyspnea of obvious cause, e.g. chest trauma, obvious clinical exacerbation of known chronic obstructive disease
  • Obvious pulmonary edema in a patient with a known diagnosis of HF and recently admitted to hospital for HF
  • Clinician does not plan to treat for AHF at all, but rather to pursue other causes of dyspnea (i.e., probability of AHF ≤ 20%)
  • Clinician plans to treat for AHF and not to pursue other causes of dyspnea (i.e., probability of AHF ≥ 80%)
  • Acute coronary syndrome within one month
  • Chronic renal failure (serum creatinine ≥ 250 mol/l)
  • Anticipated life expectancy \< 6 months due to non-cardiovascular causes
  • Participation in another interventional outcome trial
  • Inability to obtain informed consent, including inability of patient to understand English

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Wayne State University

Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States

Location

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada

Location

Waikato Hospital Cardiology Clinical Trials Unit

Waikato, New Zealand

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Januzzi JL Jr, Camargo CA, Anwaruddin S, Baggish AL, Chen AA, Krauser DG, Tung R, Cameron R, Nagurney JT, Chae CU, Lloyd-Jones DM, Brown DF, Foran-Melanson S, Sluss PM, Lee-Lewandrowski E, Lewandrowski KB. The N-terminal Pro-BNP investigation of dyspnea in the emergency department (PRIDE) study. Am J Cardiol. 2005 Apr 15;95(8):948-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.032.

    PMID: 15820160BACKGROUND
  • McCullough PA, Nowak RM, McCord J, Hollander JE, Herrmann HC, Steg PG, Duc P, Westheim A, Omland T, Knudsen CW, Storrow AB, Abraham WT, Lamba S, Wu AH, Perez A, Clopton P, Krishnaswamy P, Kazanegra R, Maisel AS. B-type natriuretic peptide and clinical judgment in emergency diagnosis of heart failure: analysis from Breathing Not Properly (BNP) Multinational Study. Circulation. 2002 Jul 23;106(4):416-22. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000025242.79963.4c.

    PMID: 12135939BACKGROUND
  • Moe GW, Howlett J, Januzzi JL, Zowall H; Canadian Multicenter Improved Management of Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (IMPROVE-CHF) Study Investigators. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide testing improves the management of patients with suspected acute heart failure: primary results of the Canadian prospective randomized multicenter IMPROVE-CHF study. Circulation. 2007 Jun 19;115(24):3103-10. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.666255. Epub 2007 Jun 4.

    PMID: 17548729BACKGROUND
  • Steinhart B, Thorpe KE, Bayoumi AM, Moe G, Januzzi JL Jr, Mazer CD. Improving the diagnosis of acute heart failure using a validated prediction model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Oct 13;54(16):1515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.065.

    PMID: 19815122BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dyspnea

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiration DisordersRespiratory Tract DiseasesSigns and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Brian Steinhart, MD

    Unity Health Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • David Mazer, MD

    Unity Health Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Gordon Moe, MD

    Unity Health Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2010

First Posted

September 2, 2010

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion

June 1, 2014

Study Completion

June 1, 2014

Last Updated

June 16, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-06

Locations