Study Stopped
ChloroPrep Wipes no longer available
ChloraPrep Versus Betadine for Elective Knee Replacement Surgery
A Comparison of Chlorhexadine Gluconate Versus Povidone Iodine Surgical Preparation in Skin Bacterial Colony Counts for Elective Knee Replacement Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will enroll patients who will be receiving primary total knee replacements. Subjects will be randomized into two groups: Betadine surgical scrub preparation and ChloraPrep preparation prior to total knee replacements. Study hypothesis: When used as a surgical scrub preparation prior to primary total knee arthroplasties, ChloraPrep (2% chlorhexadine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol) is superior to Betadine (10% povidone iodine) in reducing incision site bacterial colony counts.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Nov 2009
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 16, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 18, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedApril 16, 2013
April 1, 2013
3.1 years
August 16, 2010
April 15, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quantitative bacterial colony counts for aerobic and anaerobic culture swabs will be taken at 3 timeperiods to determine if ChloraPrep is superior to Betadine in reducing incision site bacterial colony counts.
Subjects scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty will be randomized to receive either a Betadine surgical scrub or ChloraPrep surgical scrub at the time of surgery. Subjects will be enrolled until swab #3 is obtained, 24 hours post-surgery.
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects randomized to Arm 1 will receive Betadine surgical scrub at the time of primary total knee arthroplasty.
Arm 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in Arm 2 will receive ChloraPrep surgical scrub prior to elective primary total knee arthroplasty.
Interventions
A swab will be taken over the operative knee before surgical site preparation is started, after preparation has taken place, and 24 hours post-surgery.
A swab will be taken over the operative knee before surgical site preparation is started, after preparation has taken place, and 24 hours post-surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Scheduled to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty
- Age 18 or over
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to provide informed consent or to comply with study assessments due to cognitive impairment or geographic distance
- Age 17 or younger
- Allergies to chlorhexadine gluconate or povidone iodine
- Topical antimicrobial use within 14 days of surgery
- Any active dermatoses or open wounds over the operative site
- Any condition requiring antibiotics 14 days prior to arriving for surgery
- Patients with chronic immunosuppression (such as HIV/AIDS)
- Unable to adhere to follow up schedule and treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Central DuPage Hospital
Winfield, Illinois, 60190, United States
Related Publications (8)
Ostrander RV, Botte MJ, Brage ME. Efficacy of surgical preparation solutions in foot and ankle surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):980-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.01977.
PMID: 15866959BACKGROUNDEdwards PS, Lipp A, Holmes A. Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD003949. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003949.pub2.
PMID: 15266508BACKGROUNDAly R, Maibach HI. Comparative antibacterial efficacy of a 2-minute surgical scrub with chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone-iodine, and chloroxylenol sponge-brushes. Am J Infect Control. 1988 Aug;16(4):173-7. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(88)90029-6.
PMID: 3189943BACKGROUNDKaul AF, Jewett JF. Agents and techniques for disinfection of the skin. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 May;152(5):677-85. No abstract available.
PMID: 7013126BACKGROUNDGrabsch EA, Mitchell DJ, Hooper J, Turnidge JD. In-use efficacy of a chlorhexidine in alcohol surgical rub: a comparative study. ANZ J Surg. 2004 Sep;74(9):769-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03154.x.
PMID: 15379808BACKGROUNDNishimura C. Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of povidone-iodine, povidone-iodine-ethanol and chlorhexidine gluconate-ethanol surgical scrubs. Dermatology. 2006;212 Suppl 1:21-5. doi: 10.1159/000089195.
PMID: 16490971BACKGROUNDGeelhoed GW, Sharpe K, Simon GL. A comparative study of surgical skin preparation methods. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983 Sep;157(3):265-8.
PMID: 6612574BACKGROUNDKeblish DJ, Zurakowski D, Wilson MG, Chiodo CP. Preoperative skin preparation of the foot and ankle: bristles and alcohol are better. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):986-92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02695.
PMID: 15866960BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Scott Sporer, MD
Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 16, 2010
First Posted
August 18, 2010
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 16, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-04