NCT01163708

Brief Summary

This project aims to assess two different techniques used to position the knee replacement implant during surgery. The patients will be randomised to receive either the following:

  1. 1.The established Navigation System (gold standard)
  2. 2.The new Prophecy Technique (validated by the Navigation System)

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
188

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2010

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 14, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 16, 2010

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2010

Completed
7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

July 29, 2010

Status Verified

July 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

7 years

First QC Date

July 14, 2010

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2010

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Prophecy Guide Outcomes in Total Knee Replacement Surgery

    The primary objective of this study is to investigate the Prophecy technique and compare its outcomes to the established navigation (Gold standard) technique

    5 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Prophecy Guide Outcomes in Total Knee Replacement Surgery

    5 years

Study Arms (2)

Navigation alone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Navigation system alone vs Prophecy technique with Navigation system validation

Device: Navigation System

Prophecy and Navigation validation

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Prophecy Technique

Interventions

Navigation computerised system is used intraoperatively to correct implant the Advance knee implant. Prophecy is a pre-alignment technique where a pre-op MRI or CT scan is used to manufacture personalised cutting blocks to assist the surgeon in correct implanting the Advance knee implant intraoperatively

Also known as: Prophecy Preoperative alignment
Prophecy and Navigation validation
Navigation alone

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients requiring a total Knee Arthroplasty as determined jointly by the surgeon and the patient.
  • Over 65 years of age at time of surgery.
  • Patients with the Varus or Valgus Osteoarthritis
  • Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing to participate for the length of the prescribed term of follow-up.
  • Patients who are capable of, and have given, informed consent to their participation in the study.
  • The individual does not have an active infection within the affected joint.
  • The individual has not had a previous total knee replacement or knee fusion of the affected knee joint.
  • The individual is skeletally mature.
  • The individual is not pregnant.
  • The individual is not a prisoner.
  • The individual has no plans to relocate to another geographic area before the completion of the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous surgery requiring implanting a device.
  • Knee deformity is \>30° anatomic varus (as measured on an AP radiograph taken with the patient standing)
  • Knee deformity is \>30° anatomic valgus (as measured on an AP radiograph taken with the patient standing) \>20° knee flexion contracture (as measured by investigator examination)
  • Those patients requiring bone grafting or any other procedure that would extend the operative time beyond that of just replacing the knee should be excluded.
  • The individual is classified as morbidly obese (\>40 BMI).
  • The individual is physically or mentally compromised (i.e., currently being treated for a psychiatric disorder, senile dementia, Alzheimer's disease, presence of alcohol or substance abuse), and is unwilling or unable to comply with postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluation and rehabilitation.
  • The individual has a neuromuscular or neuro-sensory deficiency which limits the ability to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the device.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Holy Spirit Northside Private Hospital

Chermside, Queensland, 4032, Australia

Location

Prince Charles Hospital

Chermside, Queensland, 4032, Australia

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Interventions

Surgical Navigation Systems

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Surgical EquipmentEquipment and Supplies

Study Officials

  • Hugh English

    Brisbane Orthopaedic Specialist Services

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2010

First Posted

July 16, 2010

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion

August 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

July 29, 2010

Record last verified: 2010-07

Locations