Compare the Efficacy of Cinacalcet vs Traditional Vitamin D for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) Among Subjects Undergoing Hemodialysis
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label Study to Compare the Efficacy of Cinacalcet Versus Traditional Vitamin D Therapy for Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Among Subjects Undergoing Hemodialysis
2 other identifiers
interventional
312
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of treatment with cinacalcet to manage plasma parathyroid levels as to compared traditional vitamin D therapy, whether given orally or intravenously, among hemodialysis subjects with secondary hyperparathyroidism when the doses are adjusted appropriately to maintain serum calcium and phosphorous levels with currently recommended ranges.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Oct 2010
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 17, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 14, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 25, 2014
CompletedOctober 17, 2018
September 1, 2018
1.8 years
August 12, 2010
December 3, 2013
September 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean PTH During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
Mean PTH during EAP is defined as the mean of values at study weeks 40, 44, 48 and 52
Baseline to week 40-52
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Treatment Comparison of >=30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
Baseline to week 40-52
Treatment Comparison of Plasma PTH < 300 pg/mL During Efficacy Assessment Phase (EAP)
week 40-52
Study Arms (2)
Traditional Vitamin D Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORCinacalcet
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Traditional vitamin D therapy (eg, calcitriol, paricalcitol, alfacalcidol, doxercalciferol), to manage secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in this study will be administered according to strategies that have been used in clinical practice and that conform to current therapeutic recommendations and available clinical practice guidelines and product labeling.
Subjects randomized to treatment with cinacalcet will receive an initial oral dose of 30 mg once daily. Doses will be titrated incrementally to 60, 90,120, and 180 mg per day based upon periodic measurements of serum calcium and plasma PTH levels. Cinacalcet is formulated as light green tablets in 30, 60, and 90 mg free-based equivalents. Tablets will be 30, 60, and 90 mg, graduated in size, smallest to largest. Combinations of these 3 fixed dosage formulations will be used to achieve the 120 and 180 mg daily doses.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years at screening
- Treated with maintenance hemodialysis 3 times a week for ≥ 3 months prior to screening
- Informed consent provided by the study candidate
- For subjects NOT receiving cinacalcet and/or vitamin D therapy for SHPT within 60 days prior to enrollment: Plasma PTH levels ≥ 450 pg/mL (50 pmol/L) during screening, as obtained from the central laboratory and, Serum corrected total calcium ≥ 8.4 mg/dL (2.1 mmol/L) and \< 10.2 mg/dL (2.55 mmol/L) during screening, as obtained from the central laboratory
You may not qualify if:
- Parathyroidectomy in the 12 weeks before the date of informed consent
- History of seizure within 12 weeks prior to randomization
- Scheduled for kidney transplant
- Parathyroidectomy anticipated within the next 6 months
- Liver function tests \> than 2 x the Upper Limit of Normal
- Prior use of bisphosphonates, or expected to receive bisphosphonates during the trial
- Subject has previously enrolled in this study
- General
- Other investigational procedures are excluded
- Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study(s), or receiving other investigational agent(s)
- Subject (male or female) is not willing to use highly effective contraception during treatment and for at least one month (women) and 3 months (men) after the end of treatment
- Subject is pregnant or breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant during study or within 1 month after the end of treatment Male subject with a pregnant partner who is not willing to use a condom during treatment and for at least 1 month after the end of treatment
- Subject has known sensitivity or intolerance to any of the protocol required therapies
- Subject will not be available for protocol-required study visits, to the best of the subject and investigator's knowledge
- Subject has any kind of disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or to comply with all required study procedures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amgenlead
Related Publications (2)
Wetmore JB, Gurevich K, Sprague S, Da Roza G, Buerkert J, Reiner M, Goodman W, Cooper K. A Randomized Trial of Cinacalcet versus Vitamin D Analogs as Monotherapy in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (PARADIGM). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):1031-40. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07050714. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
PMID: 25904755BACKGROUNDSprague SM, Wetmore JB, Gurevich K, Da Roza G, Buerkert J, Reiner M, Goodman W, Cooper K. Effect of Cinacalcet and Vitamin D Analogs on Fibroblast Growth Factor-23 during the Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):1021-30. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03270314. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
PMID: 25873267DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Amgen Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MD
Amgen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2010
First Posted
August 13, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 17, 2012
Study Completion
August 14, 2012
Last Updated
October 17, 2018
Results First Posted
April 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2018-09