Dispensing Evaluation of a Galyfilcon A Prototype Lens and a Marketed Contact Lens
1 other identifier
interventional
53
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare visual acuity and redness of eyes between a prototype contact lens and an already marketed contact lens.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2010
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 11, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 5, 2014
CompletedJune 19, 2018
August 1, 2017
1 month
August 11, 2010
November 7, 2011
June 18, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Visual Acuity Monocular
Snellen monocular visual acuity measurement was measured in both eyes that wore lenses for one week and came in for the evaluation with an inserted lens.
after 7 +/- 1 days of lens wear
Visual Acuity Binocular
Snellen binocular visual acuity measurement
after 7 +/- 1 days of lens wear
Subjective Assessment of Lens Comfort Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM Questionnaire.
The contract Lens Experience (CLUE)TM questionnaire is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response.
after 7 +/-1 days of lens wear
Subjective Assessment of Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience(CLUE)TM Questionnaire.
Contact Lens User Experience CLUE)TM questionnaire: A validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response.
after 7 +/- 1 days of lens wear
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Limbal Redness
after 7 days of lens wear
Bulbar Redness
after 7 days of lens wear
Subjective Assessment of Lens Comfort Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM Questionnaire.
10 minutes after lens insertion at time of initial lens fitting
Study Arms (2)
galyfilcon A prototype/comfilcon A
OTHERThe galyfilcon A prototype lenses are worn during first period and comfilcon A lenses worn during second period. Each period consists of daily lens wear for one week.
comfilcon A/galyfilcon A prototype
OTHERThe comfilcon A lenses are worn during first period and galyfilcon A prototype lenses worn during second period. Each period consists of daily lens wear for one week.
Interventions
silicone hydrogel contact lens
silicone hydrogel contact lens
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject is a current spherical soft contact lens wearer and willing to wear the study lenses on a daily wear basis for the duration of the study.
- The subject's optimal vertexed spherical equivalent distance correction must be between -1.00 and - 5.00D.
- Any cylinder power must be ≤ -0.75D.
- The subject must have visual acuity best correctable to 20/25+3 or better for each eye.
- The subject must read and sign the Statement of Informed Consent.
- The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in the clinical protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- Ocular or systemic allergies or disease which might interfere with contact lens wear.
- Systemic disease or use of medication which might interfere with contact lens wear.
- Clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) corneal edema, corneal vascularization, corneal staining, or any other abnormalities of the cornea which would contraindicate contact lens wear.
- Clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection which might interfere with contact lens wear.
- Any ocular infection.
- Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Diabetes.
- Infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immuno-suppressive disease (e.g. HIV).
- Habitual contact lens type is toric, multifocal, or is worn as extended wear.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Fincastle, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Salem, Virginia, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- John Buch, OD, MS, FAAO
- Organization
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 11, 2010
First Posted
August 13, 2010
Study Start
June 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 1, 2010
Study Completion
July 1, 2010
Last Updated
June 19, 2018
Results First Posted
February 5, 2014
Record last verified: 2017-08