The Clinical Effect of Low-Intensity Electromagnetic Field Neurostimulation in Fibromyalgia Syndrome Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
91
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether persons treated with a low-intensity, noninvasive form of cortical electrical stimulation experience a reduction in symptoms of fibromyalgia different than persons receiving a sham treatment. Outcome measures include reduction in patient pain levels and improvement in sleep measures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2002
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2002
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 30, 2014
CompletedJune 9, 2014
May 1, 2014
6 years
August 10, 2010
March 19, 2014
May 30, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Tender Point Pain Threshold
Tender point pain threshold is derived by summing the dolorimetry-based pain pressure thresholds measured on a subject for each of the 18 tender points sites specified by the American College of Rheumatology for fibromyalgia classification. The range of dolorimeter values for each tender point site is 0-4 (units are kilograms per square centimeter, i.e. kg/cm\^2). Higher numbers represent greater pressure required to elicit pain, and are thus indicators of "less pain" sensitivity at the tender point. Since 18 tender points are measured on a patient and their individual dolorimeter values summed, the range of tender point pain threshold values is 0-72. A higher score represents less overall pain sensitivity. The change in tender point pain threshold is determined by subtracting values at baseline from values at end of treatment. Thus a positive difference represents pain improvement (i.e.. a better outcome). A negative difference represents pain worsening (i.e. a worse outcome).
Total timeframe 13 weeks: baseline followed by 11 weeks of treatment with outcome assessed within 14 days following end of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in Number of Positive Tender Points
Total timeframe 13 weeks: baseline followed by 11 weeks of treatment with outcome assessed within 14 days following end of treatment
Change in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Overall Score
Total timeframe 13 weeks: baseline followed by 11 weeks of treatment with outcome assessed within 14 days following end of treatment
Change in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale
Total timeframe 13 weeks: baseline followed by 11 weeks of treatment with outcome assessed within 14 days following end of treatment
Change in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Sleep Satisfaction Visual Analog Scale
Total timeframe 13 weeks: baseline followed by 11 weeks of treatment with outcome assessed within 14 days following end of treatment
Study Arms (2)
Active treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in this group will receive the noninvasive cortical stimulation signal from the treatment device
Placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects in this group will be provided the same experience as those in the active treatment arm, but will not receive the noninvasive cortical stimulation signal from the treatment device
Interventions
Subjects will receive 22 sessions of the intervention protocol, twice per week for a total of 11 weeks. The signal stimulation used in this study utilizes amplitude modulation to shape a high frequency carrier signal, nominally greater than 10 kilohertz, into the form of one or more low frequency components, nominally less than 40 hertz. Exact protocol is set in software and is the same for all participants in the active treatment arm.
Subjects in the placebo group will receive the exact same experience as those in the active treatment group. However, the device will not output any electrical stimulation signal.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 through 65 years
- An ability to read and comprehend English
- Completion of a minimum of grade 8 education
- Diagnosis of fibromyalgia in 1999 or earlier, by a rheumatologist or appropriate specialist, and currently meeting the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria
- Symptoms for at least 48 months with no recent remission of symptoms to any degree
You may not qualify if:
- Developmental disabilities, or significant psychological disorder (except depression and anxiety disorders) for which treatment has become necessary
- A history of chronic infection or chronic condition such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Parkinson's Disease, multiple sclerosis, hepatitis, history of meningo-encephalitis, polio, seizures, or metastatic cancer
- Current pregnancy, or plans to become pregnant during the study period.
- Any other condition deemed to pose a risk to the patient at the discretion of the investigators
- Exposure to other neurostimulation systems, or electroconvulsive therapy
- Any implantable electronic device
- Any present or previous litigation regarding their physical condition
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- McLaren Regional Medical Centerlead
- Kettering Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
McLaren Regional Medical Center
Flint, Michigan, 48532, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jeffrey B. Hargrove
- Organization
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kettering University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffrey B Hargrove, PhD
Kettering University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan J Smith, MD
McLaren Regional Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sunil Nagpal, MD
McLaren Regional Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David G Simons, MD
Emory University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2010
First Posted
August 12, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2002
Primary Completion
January 1, 2008
Study Completion
July 1, 2008
Last Updated
June 9, 2014
Results First Posted
May 30, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05