NCT01180244

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether persons treated with a low-intensity, noninvasive form of cortical electrical stimulation experience a reduction in symptoms of fibromyalgia different than persons receiving a sham treatment. Outcome measures include reduction in patient pain levels and improvement in sleep measures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
91

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2002

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2002

Completed
6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2008

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2008

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 10, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 12, 2010

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 30, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

June 9, 2014

Status Verified

May 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

6 years

First QC Date

August 10, 2010

Results QC Date

March 19, 2014

Last Update Submit

May 30, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

fibromyalgianoninvasiveelectricalcorticalstimulationpainbraintender point

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Tender Point Pain Threshold

    Tender point pain threshold is derived by summing the dolorimetry-based pain pressure thresholds measured on a subject for each of the 18 tender points sites specified by the American College of Rheumatology for fibromyalgia classification. The range of dolorimeter values for each tender point site is 0-4 (units are kilograms per square centimeter, i.e. kg/cm\^2). Higher numbers represent greater pressure required to elicit pain, and are thus indicators of "less pain" sensitivity at the tender point. Since 18 tender points are measured on a patient and their individual dolorimeter values summed, the range of tender point pain threshold values is 0-72. A higher score represents less overall pain sensitivity. The change in tender point pain threshold is determined by subtracting values at baseline from values at end of treatment. Thus a positive difference represents pain improvement (i.e.. a better outcome). A negative difference represents pain worsening (i.e. a worse outcome).

    Total timeframe 13 weeks: baseline followed by 11 weeks of treatment with outcome assessed within 14 days following end of treatment

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in Number of Positive Tender Points

    Total timeframe 13 weeks: baseline followed by 11 weeks of treatment with outcome assessed within 14 days following end of treatment

  • Change in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Overall Score

    Total timeframe 13 weeks: baseline followed by 11 weeks of treatment with outcome assessed within 14 days following end of treatment

  • Change in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Pain Visual Analog Scale

    Total timeframe 13 weeks: baseline followed by 11 weeks of treatment with outcome assessed within 14 days following end of treatment

  • Change in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Sleep Satisfaction Visual Analog Scale

    Total timeframe 13 weeks: baseline followed by 11 weeks of treatment with outcome assessed within 14 days following end of treatment

Study Arms (2)

Active treatment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects in this group will receive the noninvasive cortical stimulation signal from the treatment device

Device: Noninvasive cortical electrical stimulation

Placebo group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Subjects in this group will be provided the same experience as those in the active treatment arm, but will not receive the noninvasive cortical stimulation signal from the treatment device

Device: Sham treatment

Interventions

Subjects will receive 22 sessions of the intervention protocol, twice per week for a total of 11 weeks. The signal stimulation used in this study utilizes amplitude modulation to shape a high frequency carrier signal, nominally greater than 10 kilohertz, into the form of one or more low frequency components, nominally less than 40 hertz. Exact protocol is set in software and is the same for all participants in the active treatment arm.

Also known as: NeuroPoint
Active treatment

Subjects in the placebo group will receive the exact same experience as those in the active treatment group. However, the device will not output any electrical stimulation signal.

Also known as: NeuroPoint
Placebo group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 through 65 years
  • An ability to read and comprehend English
  • Completion of a minimum of grade 8 education
  • Diagnosis of fibromyalgia in 1999 or earlier, by a rheumatologist or appropriate specialist, and currently meeting the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria
  • Symptoms for at least 48 months with no recent remission of symptoms to any degree

You may not qualify if:

  • Developmental disabilities, or significant psychological disorder (except depression and anxiety disorders) for which treatment has become necessary
  • A history of chronic infection or chronic condition such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Parkinson's Disease, multiple sclerosis, hepatitis, history of meningo-encephalitis, polio, seizures, or metastatic cancer
  • Current pregnancy, or plans to become pregnant during the study period.
  • Any other condition deemed to pose a risk to the patient at the discretion of the investigators
  • Exposure to other neurostimulation systems, or electroconvulsive therapy
  • Any implantable electronic device
  • Any present or previous litigation regarding their physical condition

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

McLaren Regional Medical Center

Flint, Michigan, 48532, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

FibromyalgiaPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Jeffrey B. Hargrove
Organization
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kettering University

Study Officials

  • Jeffrey B Hargrove, PhD

    Kettering University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Susan J Smith, MD

    McLaren Regional Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Sunil Nagpal, MD

    McLaren Regional Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • David G Simons, MD

    Emory University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2010

First Posted

August 12, 2010

Study Start

January 1, 2002

Primary Completion

January 1, 2008

Study Completion

July 1, 2008

Last Updated

June 9, 2014

Results First Posted

May 30, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-05

Locations