Early Detection of Cancers in Low Resource Countries
Efficacy of a Combined Program for Early Detection of Breast and Gynecological Cancers in Low Resource Countries
1 other identifier
observational
36,000
3 countries
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to implement a community-based combined program for early detection of breast, cervical, ovarian and endometrial cancer in low-resource countries delivered through a free standing or a mobile Well Woman Clinic. The goals of this program are to downstage cancers and improve mortality rates using low-cost early detection methods. These programs will be implemented in regions where early cancer detection strategies are not in place and cancers present at advanced stages with resultant high mortality. Currently, there are three target project sites: Cambodia (June 2011), India (June 2011), and Brazil (March 2011). Memorandums of Understanding have been secured with local health organizations in each region to establish clinic operations. Each clinic would serve an approximate target population of 100,000 amongst whom about 12,000 eligible women (4-5,000 annually) will be invited to be screened for breast and cervical cancer over a three-year time span.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2011
Typical duration for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 6, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedAugust 10, 2010
August 1, 2010
3 years
August 6, 2010
August 8, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Effectiveness of an Innovative, Low-Cost Screening and Diagnostic Methodology
This study will examine the effectiveness of an innovative, low-cost screening and diagnostic methodology used for combined early detection of breast and gynecological cancers in low resource regions where early cancer detection strategies are not in place and cancers currently are diagnosed at advanced stages with resultant high mortality.
Three (3) year interval
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Effectiveness of CBE and Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection
Three (3) year interval
Study Arms (1)
Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
Screening of asymptomatic women for Breast and Cervical cancer in the age group of 35-64 years. Diagnostic assessment of symptomatic women for Ovarian and Endometrial cancer in the age group of 50-64 years.
Interventions
Clinical Breast Examination and Sonography followed by Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of screen positive cases.
Visual Inspection with Acetic acid, PAP smear or Human Papilloma Virus DNA testing followed by Cryotherapy of screen positive cases.
Transvaginal sonogram and clinical evaluation in post menopausal women with symptoms suggestive of ovarian cancer.
Transvaginal sonographic assessment of the endometrial stripe in post menopausal women with abnormal bleeding.
Eligibility Criteria
Brazil has two rural hospitals serving a population of roughly 46,000 people (Nova Andradina) inside Mato Grosso do Sul, which has a population of over 2 million. Cambodia has a population of over 1 million inside the Phnom Penh metropolitan area. India has a population of more than 1.3 million inside the state of Goa. According to the NFHS-2, nearly 30 percent of rural Goan women live 10 or more kilometers away from a primary health center.
You may qualify if:
- Breast Cancer: women age 35-64
- Cervical Cancer: women age 30-59
- Ovarian Cancer: symptomatic post menopausal women age 50-64
- Endometrial Cancer: symptomatic post menopausal women age 50-64
You may not qualify if:
- women under the age of 30
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Hospital de Cancer de Barretos
SĂ£o Paulo, Brazil
Sihanouk Hospital Center of Hope, Hope Worldwide Cambodia
Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Manipal Healthcare Group
Goa, India
Related Publications (17)
Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1245-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1245.
PMID: 15755947BACKGROUNDKuhl CK. The "coming of age" of nonmammographic screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2203-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2203. No abstract available.
PMID: 18477789BACKGROUNDBerg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Bohm-Velez M, Pisano ED, Jong RA, Evans WP, Morton MJ, Mahoney MC, Larsen LH, Barr RG, Farria DM, Marques HS, Boparai K; ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2151-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151.
PMID: 18477782BACKGROUNDKolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):165-75. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2251011667.
PMID: 12355001BACKGROUNDKaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology. 2001 Dec;221(3):641-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2213010364.
PMID: 11719658BACKGROUNDTohno E, Ueno E, Watanabe H. Ultrasound screening of breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2009;16(1):18-22. doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0082-8. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
PMID: 19009372BACKGROUNDSankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS, Jayant K, Muwonge R, Budukh AM, Hingmire S, Malvi SG, Thorat R, Kothari A, Chinoy R, Kelkar R, Kane S, Desai S, Keskar VR, Rajeshwarkar R, Panse N, Dinshaw KA. HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 2;360(14):1385-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808516.
PMID: 19339719BACKGROUNDSchiffman M, Wacholder S. From India to the world--a better way to prevent cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 2;360(14):1453-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0901167. No abstract available.
PMID: 19339726BACKGROUNDGoldie SJ, Kuhn L, Denny L, Pollack A, Wright TC. Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource settings: clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness. JAMA. 2001 Jun 27;285(24):3107-15. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.24.3107.
PMID: 11427139BACKGROUNDGoff BA, Mandel LS, Drescher CW, Urban N, Gough S, Schurman KM, Patras J, Mahony BS, Andersen MR. Development of an ovarian cancer symptom index: possibilities for earlier detection. Cancer. 2007 Jan 15;109(2):221-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22371.
PMID: 17154394BACKGROUNDGoff BA, Mandel LS, Melancon CH, Muntz HG. Frequency of symptoms of ovarian cancer in women presenting to primary care clinics. JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2705-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2705.
PMID: 15187051BACKGROUNDMenon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Hallett R, Ryan A, Burnell M, Sharma A, Lewis S, Davies S, Philpott S, Lopes A, Godfrey K, Oram D, Herod J, Williamson K, Seif MW, Scott I, Mould T, Woolas R, Murdoch J, Dobbs S, Amso NN, Leeson S, Cruickshank D, McGuire A, Campbell S, Fallowfield L, Singh N, Dawnay A, Skates SJ, Parmar M, Jacobs I. Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). Lancet Oncol. 2009 Apr;10(4):327-40. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70026-9. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
PMID: 19282241BACKGROUNDvan Nagell JR Jr, DePriest PD, Ueland FR, DeSimone CP, Cooper AL, McDonald JM, Pavlik EJ, Kryscio RJ. Ovarian cancer screening with annual transvaginal sonography: findings of 25,000 women screened. Cancer. 2007 May 1;109(9):1887-96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22594.
PMID: 17373668BACKGROUNDVan den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D, Domali E, Vergote I, Moerman P, Amant F, Timmerman D. A thin and regular endometrium on ultrasound is very unlikely in patients with endometrial malignancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;29(6):674-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.4031.
PMID: 17523157BACKGROUNDSmith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Feldstein VA, Subak L, Scheidler J, Segal M, Brand R, Grady D. Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA. 1998 Nov 4;280(17):1510-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.17.1510.
PMID: 9809732BACKGROUNDTabor A, Watt HC, Wald NJ. Endometrial thickness as a test for endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Apr;99(4):663-70. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01771-9.
PMID: 12039131BACKGROUNDAmant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2005 Aug 6-12;366(9484):491-505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67063-8.
PMID: 16084259BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Weiwei Yang, MD
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Diljeet K Singh, MD
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adhemar Longatto Filho, MD
University of Sao Paolo
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 6, 2010
First Posted
August 10, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 10, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-08