NCT01178736

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to implement a community-based combined program for early detection of breast, cervical, ovarian and endometrial cancer in low-resource countries delivered through a free standing or a mobile Well Woman Clinic. The goals of this program are to downstage cancers and improve mortality rates using low-cost early detection methods. These programs will be implemented in regions where early cancer detection strategies are not in place and cancers present at advanced stages with resultant high mortality. Currently, there are three target project sites: Cambodia (June 2011), India (June 2011), and Brazil (March 2011). Memorandums of Understanding have been secured with local health organizations in each region to establish clinic operations. Each clinic would serve an approximate target population of 100,000 amongst whom about 12,000 eligible women (4-5,000 annually) will be invited to be screened for breast and cervical cancer over a three-year time span.

Trial Health

47
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
36,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2011

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
3 countries

3 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 6, 2010

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 10, 2010

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2011

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

August 10, 2010

Status Verified

August 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

August 6, 2010

Last Update Submit

August 8, 2010

Conditions

Keywords

neoplasms

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Effectiveness of an Innovative, Low-Cost Screening and Diagnostic Methodology

    This study will examine the effectiveness of an innovative, low-cost screening and diagnostic methodology used for combined early detection of breast and gynecological cancers in low resource regions where early cancer detection strategies are not in place and cancers currently are diagnosed at advanced stages with resultant high mortality.

    Three (3) year interval

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Effectiveness of CBE and Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection

    Three (3) year interval

Study Arms (1)

Cancer Screening and Diagnosis

Screening of asymptomatic women for Breast and Cervical cancer in the age group of 35-64 years. Diagnostic assessment of symptomatic women for Ovarian and Endometrial cancer in the age group of 50-64 years.

Procedure: Breast Cancer Screening and DiagnosisProcedure: Cervical Cancer Screening and DiagnosisProcedure: Ovarian Cancer Screening and DiagnosisProcedure: Endometrial Cancer Screening and Diagnosis

Interventions

Clinical Breast Examination and Sonography followed by Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of screen positive cases.

Also known as: FNAB, CBE, Ultrasound
Cancer Screening and Diagnosis

Visual Inspection with Acetic acid, PAP smear or Human Papilloma Virus DNA testing followed by Cryotherapy of screen positive cases.

Also known as: HPV DNA
Cancer Screening and Diagnosis

Transvaginal sonogram and clinical evaluation in post menopausal women with symptoms suggestive of ovarian cancer.

Also known as: Ultrasound
Cancer Screening and Diagnosis

Transvaginal sonographic assessment of the endometrial stripe in post menopausal women with abnormal bleeding.

Also known as: Ultrasound
Cancer Screening and Diagnosis

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 64 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Brazil has two rural hospitals serving a population of roughly 46,000 people (Nova Andradina) inside Mato Grosso do Sul, which has a population of over 2 million. Cambodia has a population of over 1 million inside the Phnom Penh metropolitan area. India has a population of more than 1.3 million inside the state of Goa. According to the NFHS-2, nearly 30 percent of rural Goan women live 10 or more kilometers away from a primary health center.

You may qualify if:

  • Breast Cancer: women age 35-64
  • Cervical Cancer: women age 30-59
  • Ovarian Cancer: symptomatic post menopausal women age 50-64
  • Endometrial Cancer: symptomatic post menopausal women age 50-64

You may not qualify if:

  • women under the age of 30

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Hospital de Cancer de Barretos

SĂ£o Paulo, Brazil

Location

Sihanouk Hospital Center of Hope, Hope Worldwide Cambodia

Phnom Penh, Cambodia

Location

Manipal Healthcare Group

Goa, India

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1245-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1245.

    PMID: 15755947BACKGROUND
  • Kuhl CK. The "coming of age" of nonmammographic screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2203-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2203. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18477789BACKGROUND
  • Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Bohm-Velez M, Pisano ED, Jong RA, Evans WP, Morton MJ, Mahoney MC, Larsen LH, Barr RG, Farria DM, Marques HS, Boparai K; ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2151-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151.

    PMID: 18477782BACKGROUND
  • Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):165-75. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2251011667.

    PMID: 12355001BACKGROUND
  • Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology. 2001 Dec;221(3):641-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2213010364.

    PMID: 11719658BACKGROUND
  • Tohno E, Ueno E, Watanabe H. Ultrasound screening of breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2009;16(1):18-22. doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0082-8. Epub 2008 Nov 14.

    PMID: 19009372BACKGROUND
  • Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS, Jayant K, Muwonge R, Budukh AM, Hingmire S, Malvi SG, Thorat R, Kothari A, Chinoy R, Kelkar R, Kane S, Desai S, Keskar VR, Rajeshwarkar R, Panse N, Dinshaw KA. HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 2;360(14):1385-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808516.

    PMID: 19339719BACKGROUND
  • Schiffman M, Wacholder S. From India to the world--a better way to prevent cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 2;360(14):1453-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0901167. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19339726BACKGROUND
  • Goldie SJ, Kuhn L, Denny L, Pollack A, Wright TC. Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource settings: clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness. JAMA. 2001 Jun 27;285(24):3107-15. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.24.3107.

    PMID: 11427139BACKGROUND
  • Goff BA, Mandel LS, Drescher CW, Urban N, Gough S, Schurman KM, Patras J, Mahony BS, Andersen MR. Development of an ovarian cancer symptom index: possibilities for earlier detection. Cancer. 2007 Jan 15;109(2):221-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22371.

    PMID: 17154394BACKGROUND
  • Goff BA, Mandel LS, Melancon CH, Muntz HG. Frequency of symptoms of ovarian cancer in women presenting to primary care clinics. JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2705-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2705.

    PMID: 15187051BACKGROUND
  • Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Hallett R, Ryan A, Burnell M, Sharma A, Lewis S, Davies S, Philpott S, Lopes A, Godfrey K, Oram D, Herod J, Williamson K, Seif MW, Scott I, Mould T, Woolas R, Murdoch J, Dobbs S, Amso NN, Leeson S, Cruickshank D, McGuire A, Campbell S, Fallowfield L, Singh N, Dawnay A, Skates SJ, Parmar M, Jacobs I. Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). Lancet Oncol. 2009 Apr;10(4):327-40. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70026-9. Epub 2009 Mar 11.

    PMID: 19282241BACKGROUND
  • van Nagell JR Jr, DePriest PD, Ueland FR, DeSimone CP, Cooper AL, McDonald JM, Pavlik EJ, Kryscio RJ. Ovarian cancer screening with annual transvaginal sonography: findings of 25,000 women screened. Cancer. 2007 May 1;109(9):1887-96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22594.

    PMID: 17373668BACKGROUND
  • Van den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D, Domali E, Vergote I, Moerman P, Amant F, Timmerman D. A thin and regular endometrium on ultrasound is very unlikely in patients with endometrial malignancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;29(6):674-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.4031.

    PMID: 17523157BACKGROUND
  • Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Feldstein VA, Subak L, Scheidler J, Segal M, Brand R, Grady D. Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA. 1998 Nov 4;280(17):1510-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.17.1510.

    PMID: 9809732BACKGROUND
  • Tabor A, Watt HC, Wald NJ. Endometrial thickness as a test for endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Apr;99(4):663-70. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01771-9.

    PMID: 12039131BACKGROUND
  • Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2005 Aug 6-12;366(9484):491-505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67063-8.

    PMID: 16084259BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsNeoplasms

Interventions

High-Energy Shock Waves

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesUterine NeoplasmsGenital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsUterine Cervical DiseasesUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsOvarian DiseasesAdnexal DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesGonadal Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ultrasonic WavesSoundRadiation, NonionizingRadiationPhysical Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Weiwei Yang, MD

    M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Diljeet K Singh, MD

    Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Adhemar Longatto Filho, MD

    University of Sao Paolo

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2010

First Posted

August 10, 2010

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion

March 1, 2014

Study Completion

March 1, 2014

Last Updated

August 10, 2010

Record last verified: 2010-08

Locations