Improvement of Fluid Balance in Patients Undergoing Surgery of the Colon and Rectum
HOC
Does Hemodynamic Optimization During and After Colorectal Surgery Result in Improved Intestinal Perfusion, Sustained Intestinal Barrier and Improved Postoperative Recovery?
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
58 patients undergoing surgery of the large bowel are divided into two groups. The control group will receive standard care. The intervention group will receive standard care plus optimization of the blood circulation based on in- or decrease of the output of the heart. Between group differences are measured primarily by markers of intestinal damage in plasma and urine. Also CO2 pressure in the stomach lumen is measured (reflecting blood supply to the gut). The investigators hypothesize that the intervention group will have less intestinal damage, improved blood supply to the bowel and improved recovery of the operation compared to the control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Apr 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 29, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 19, 2014
CompletedJune 19, 2014
May 1, 2014
3.5 years
July 29, 2010
November 5, 2013
May 19, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Peak Value of I-FABP
Intestinal-Fatty Acid Binding Protein (a marker of intestinal damage) is measured in plasma. The primary outcome measure is the difference in peak values of I-FABP between the control group and the intervention group.
1 hour postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Average Intraoperative CO2 Gap
Average intraoperative CO2 gap
Study Arms (2)
Goal-directed fluid optimization
EXPERIMENTALFluid administration and optimization based on cardiac output findings during surgery and during the first 8 hours of the postoperative phase.
Regimen based on expertise anaesthesist
OTHERFluid regimen based on expertise anaesthesist
Interventions
Fluid administration and optimization based on cardiac output findings during surgery and during the first 8 hours of the postoperative phase.
Fluid regimen based on expertise anaesthesist
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with anastomosis;
- Minimum age 18 years;
- Giving informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Other causes of intestinal damage: eg. IBD, occlusive disease;
- Steroid use;
- Esophageal varices and other esophageal disease;
- Aortic valve disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Maastricht
Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Tolerance of esophageal Doppler probe postoperatively was low. Therefore, optimization based on cardiac output could only be achieved within 3 hours in most patients.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kostan Reisinger
- Organization
- Maastricht University Medical Center
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Maarten F Von Meyenfeldt, MD, PhD
Maastricht University Medical Center
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Martijn Poeze, MD, PhD
Maastricht University Medical Center
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Geerard L Beets, MD, PhD
Maastricht University Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Wim A Buurman, PhD
Maastricht University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2010
First Posted
August 4, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2013
Study Completion
October 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 19, 2014
Results First Posted
June 19, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05