NCT01168128

Brief Summary

Canadian Critical Care Nutrition Guidelines assist health practitioners in identifying best practices for feeding critically ill patients. However, guidelines have resulted in little change in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) practices, possibly because barriers to change differ between ICUs. Change may be facilitated if strategies specifically address identified barriers. The investigators hypothesize that barriers are inversely related to nutrition performance. Tailoring change strategies to overcome barriers to change will reduce the presence of these barriers and lead to improvements in nutrition practice.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
278

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2009

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 16, 2009

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 21, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 23, 2010

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

December 17, 2020

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 21, 2010

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Enteral NutritionParenteral NutritionCritically illNutrition TherapyNutrition SupportPractice Guidelines as TopicGuideline AdherenceQuality Assurance, Health CareNutrition SurveysQuestionnaires

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Feasibility of the study design and intervention

    Assessed by rate of completion of barriers questionnaires, development of unique tailored action plans at each site, compliance and satisfaction with the tailored action plans, and other user feedback.

    12 months post implementation of intervention

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in nutrition performance score

    20-24 months

  • Change in barriers to implementation of critical care nutrition clinical practice guidelines

    12 months post implementation of intervention

Study Arms (1)

Tailored Action Plan

EXPERIMENTAL

A Tailored Action Plan is an intervention selected to overcome barriers identified before the design and delivery of the intervention.

Other: Tailored Change Strategy

Interventions

e.g. Education, decision support tools

Tailored Action Plan

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ICUs must be affiliated with a registered dietitian.
  • ICUs must have a minimum of 8 beds.
  • ICUs must be located in Canada, Australia, or US.
  • ICUs have previously participated in the International Nutrition Survey.

You may not qualify if:

  • ICUs with less than 8 beds.
  • ICUs with high nutrition performance, as demonstrated previously in the International Nutrition Survey (i.e. average nutritional adequacy \>60% and/or above 50th percentile when ranked against all participating ICUs according to nutrition practice performance score)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Anne Arundel Medical Center

Annapolis, Maryland, United States

Location

Spartanburg Regional Medical Center

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Location

Peter Lougheed

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Location

Capital Health - University of Alberta Hospital (hospital general systems)

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Location

Southlake Regional Health Centre

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Jones NE, Dhaliwal R, Day AG, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Heyland DK. Factors predicting adherence to the Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. J Crit Care. 2008 Sep;23(3):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

    PMID: 18725033BACKGROUND
  • Jones NE, Suurdt J, Ouelette-Kuntz H, Heyland DK. Implementation of the Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nutrition Support: a multiple case study of barriers and enablers. Nutr Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;22(4):449-57. doi: 10.1177/0115426507022004449.

    PMID: 17644700BACKGROUND
  • Cahill NE, Heyland DK. Bridging the guideline-practice gap in critical care nutrition: a review of guideline implementation studies. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):653-9. doi: 10.1177/0148607110361907.

    PMID: 21097765BACKGROUND
  • Cahill NE, Suurdt J, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Heyland DK. Understanding adherence to guidelines in the intensive care unit: development of a comprehensive framework. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):616-24. doi: 10.1177/0148607110361904.

    PMID: 21097762BACKGROUND
  • Cahill NE, Murch L, Cook D, Heyland DK; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Implementing a multifaceted tailored intervention to improve nutrition adequacy in critically ill patients: results of a multicenter feasibility study. Crit Care. 2014 May 11;18(3):R96. doi: 10.1186/cc13867.

  • Cahill NE, Murch L, Cook D, Heyland DK; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Barriers to feeding critically ill patients: a multicenter survey of critical care nurses. J Crit Care. 2012 Dec;27(6):727-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Critical IllnessHyperphagia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Daren K Heyland, MD

    Clinical Evaluation Research Unit

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Heather Stuart, PhD

    Queen's University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Naomi E Cahill, RD, MSc

    Queen's University, Clinical Evaluation Research Unit

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Clinical Evaluation Research Unit

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2010

First Posted

July 23, 2010

Study Start

September 16, 2009

Primary Completion

September 1, 2011

Study Completion

September 1, 2011

Last Updated

December 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-12

Locations