The Effect of Percutaneous Superior Venae Cava Cannulation Clamping on Cerebral Near Infrared Spectroscopy in MICS
NIRSinMICS
2 other identifiers
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of minimally invasive cardiac surgery has progressed over the last 5-10 years to allow access to the heart through a small incision in the right chest. This avoids the use of a sternotomy incision through the bone in the front of the chest. The benefits of such an approach are cosmetic (smaller incision not easily visible) and faster recovery. The minimally invasive approach also eliminates the risk of sternal wound infection. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery however poses additional challenges; one of the biggest is access to the large blood vessels which need to be cannulated to allow the heart lung machine to function. In conventional surgery, these vessels are easily accessed as they are entering or leaving the heart. In minimally invasive surgery, the cannula are placed into easily accessible arteries and veins, traditionally the femoral vessels. These vessels are smaller than those by the heart and so require smaller cannula, which provide challenges to the heart lung machine. One way around this is to use more cannulae and so cannulation of a vein in the neck is also performed. This cannula however, has been associated with neck hematoma, tearing of the vein and blood loss. While placement of the cannula in the neck is routine at LHSC now, when this surgery was first performed here 10 years ago, it was done so without the neck cannula and with no injury to patients. The purpose of this study therefore, is to more rigorously study the effect of the neck cannula on heart lung bypass, and more specifically to see if oxygen delivery to the organs, and the brain in particular is sufficient to avoid hypoxia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2011
CompletedMay 15, 2013
May 1, 2013
1.3 years
June 8, 2010
May 14, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Near Infrared Saturation of the brain
Measure the NIRs of the brain by placeing NIRs monitoring patches on the forehead during clamped and unclamped intervention of the percutaneous superior vena cava line.
Baseline within 5 minutes of intervention then Intraoperatively during intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Mean Blood Pressure
Intraoperatively during intervention.(every 5 minutes during 40 minute intervention period).
Mean mixed venous saturation (non invasive measure)
Intraoperatively during intervention.(every 5 minutes during 40 minute intervention period).
CPB pump flow
Intraoperatively during intervention.(every 5 minutes during 40 minute intervention period).
Vacuum Pressure
Intraoperatively during intervention.(every 5 minutes during 40 minute intervention period).
Venous reservoir level
Intraoperatively during intervention.(every 5 minutes during 40 minute intervention period).
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PSVC line clamped
EXPERIMENTALClamping of the percutaneously placed superior vena cava line placed for minimally invasive mitral valve repair/replacement.
Unclamped PSVC
NO INTERVENTIONUnclamped percutaneously placed superior vena cava line placed for minimally invasive mitral valve repair/replacement.
Interventions
A line clamp will be placed on the PSVC line while on cardiopulmonary bypass.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age
- Elective mitral valve repair or replacement.
- Scheduled to have minimally invasive approach (right thoracotomy)
- No contraindication to SVC line placement
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
London Health Sciences Centre, Univeristy Hospital
London, Ontario, N6G 5A5, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Bainbridge DT, Chu MW, Kiaii B, Cleland A, Murkin J. Percutaneous superior vena cava drainage during minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a randomized, crossover study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Feb;29(1):101-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
PMID: 25440652DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Bainbridge, MD FRCPC
Lawson Health research institute, University of Western Ontario
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2010
First Posted
July 21, 2010
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
May 15, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-05