Comparison Between High-flow Nasal Cannula System and Non-invasive Ventilation in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Prospective, Open-labeled, Randomized Controlled Trial of Comparison Between High-flow Nasal Cannula System and Non-invasive Ventilation in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
1 other identifier
interventional
74
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure may require invasive mechanical ventilation. However, invasive mechanical ventilation is associated with a variety of complications. Non-invasive ventilation has been presented as an alternative treatment but controversy remains. The investigators hypothesize that high-flow nasal cannula system is effective enough to prevent intubation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and not inferior to non-invasive ventilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2011
CompletedJuly 21, 2010
July 1, 2010
1 year
July 19, 2010
July 20, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success rate of treatment in two groups
Successful treatment is to avoid intubation and achieve PaO2 \>75 mmHg without respiratory distress for 24 hours while spontaneously breathing oxygen provided by a Venturi device at FiO2 0.50.
up to 28 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
compliance of treatment
up to 28 days
adverse event
up to 28 days
hospital length of stay
up to 90 days
Hospital mortality
up to 90 days
Study Arms (2)
High-flow nasal cannula
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm,patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure were treated with high-flow nasal cannula system(Optiflow, Fisher \& Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) to achieve SpO2 \>92% or PaO2 \>65 mmHg.
Non-invasive ventilation
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this arm, patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is treated with the bi-level positive airways pressure mode (BiPAP Vision, Respironics Inc., Murrysville, PA) S/T mode to achieve SpO2 \>92% or PaO2 \>65 mmHg.
Interventions
Noninvasive ventilation: The inspiratory(IPAP) and expiratory positive airways pressure (EPAP), and the levels of FiO2 is set achieve SpO2 \>92% or PaO2 \>65 mmHg.
High flow nasal cannula system: FiO2 and flow rate of oxygen is set to achieve SpO2 \>92% or PaO2 \>65 mmHg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age above 18
- patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
You may not qualify if:
- age \< 18 years
- hypercapnia (arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) \>45mmHg) at admission
- need for emergency intubation, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- recent esophageal, facial or cranial trauma or surgery
- severely decreased consciousness (Glasgow coma score \<11)
- cardiogenic shock or severe hemodynamic instability
- systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg associated with decreased urinary output(\<20 mL.h-1) despite fluid repletion and use of vasoactive agents
- lack of co-operation
- altered mental status with decreased consciousness and/or evidence of inability to understand or lack of willingness to co-operate with the procedures
- tracheotomy or other upper airway disorders
- severe ventricular arrhythmia or active myocardial ischemia
- active upper gastrointestinal bleeding
- inability to clear respiratory secretions
- more than one severe organ dysfunction in addition to respiratory failure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
Seoul, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Chae-Man Lim, M.D.
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2010
First Posted
July 21, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 1, 2011
Last Updated
July 21, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-07