Physiology of Helmet vs. Facemask Noninvasive Ventilation
Physiological Effects of Helmet vs. Facemask Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The optimal noninvasive management of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is debated. Helmet noninvasive ventilation may be more effective than facemask noninvasive ventilation for these patients. Putatitve benefits of helmet use are the possibility to apply significantly higher positive end-expiratory pressure without air leaks and with good patient's comfort. In this randomized crossover study, the investigators will assess the physiological effects of helmet compared to facemask noninvasive ventilation, with the latter applied with different ventilator settings (similar to or different from helmet settings).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 19, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2025
CompletedSeptember 30, 2025
September 1, 2025
1.5 years
January 2, 2024
September 29, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Inspiratory effort
negative deflection in esophageal pressure
1 hour
End-expiratory lung impedance
Electrical-impedance derived end-expiratory lung volume
1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Tidal volume
1 hour
Work of breathing
1 hour
Respiratory rate
1 hour
Dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure
1 hour
Compliance
1 hour
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Helmet noninvasive ventilation
EXPERIMENTAL1-hour treatment with helmet noninvasive ventilation (PEEP 12 cmH2O + pressure support 10 cmH2O).
Facemask noninvasive ventilation (facemask settings)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1-hour treatment with facemask noninvasive ventilation (PEEP 5 cmH2O + pressure support 10 cmH2O).
Facemask noninvasive ventilation (helmet settings)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1-hour treatment with facemask noninvasive ventilation (PEEP 12 cmH2O + pressure support 10 cmH2O).
Interventions
noninvasive ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and PaO2/FiO2\<200 mmHg
- PaCO2\<45 mmHg
- Respiratory failure not caused by exacerbation of chronic pulmonary disease, cardiac failure or fluid overload
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Contraindication to helmet or facemask noninvasive ventilation
- Contraindication to esophageal manometry
- Contraindication to electrical-impedance tomography monitoring
- Recent surgery involving the abdomen or the thorax
- Pneumothorax or documented barotrauma
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fondazione Policlinico Universitaro A. Gemelli IRCCS
Rome, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Domenico L. Grieco, MD
Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 2, 2024
First Posted
January 18, 2024
Study Start
January 19, 2024
Primary Completion
July 31, 2025
Study Completion
September 15, 2025
Last Updated
September 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09