Study Stopped
Study was expanded and included in another study.
Comparing Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring System and Continuous Glucose Monitoring System
Protocol: Comparing the Effect of Using an Internet-Based Glucose Monitoring System Versus the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System on HbA1c Levels in Type 2 DM
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Management of type 2 diabetes is an ongoing challenge for patients and their doctors. In order to prevent short and long term complications, patients need to monitor and control their blood sugar levels. In addition, they may need to have an ongoing communication with their doctor in order to modify treatment. In this study the investigators wish to compare two systems of monitoring and communication of blood sugar levels. The first is the use of continuous glucose monitoring system and the second is the use of an Internet-based glucose monitoring system. The investigators want to compare their effect and/or benefits.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable type-2-diabetes-mellitus
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2011
CompletedSeptember 11, 2014
September 1, 2014
7 months
June 4, 2010
September 9, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary endpoint is the A1c level or the change in A1c level
6 Months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The secondary endpoint include severe hypoglycemia defined as requiring external aid (hospital or other).
6 Months
A secondary endpoint includes adverse events such as unplanned hospitalizations for any cause that last more than 24 hours
6 monthns
Study Arms (2)
Internet Intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe subjects enrolled in the Internet Therapeutic Intervention arm receive standard care by testing their blood glucose at least 3 times daily and visit the endocrinologist every 3 months; however, they are also asked to upload their blood glucose readings online every 2 weeks for the health practitioner to view and comment upon.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe use of CGMS (Sensor, receiver, transmitter) plus the uploading of results to the Internet-based software utility of CareLink Personal and generating reports that can be viewed and used at the patient's own preference. This group will send the uploaded data and receive feedback from their endocrinologist every 2 weeks.
Interventions
The subjects enrolled in the Internet Therapeutic Intervention arm receive standard care by testing their blood glucose at least 3 times daily and visit the endocrinologist every 3 months; however, they are also asked to upload their blood glucose readings online every 2 weeks for the health practitioner to view and comment upon.
The use of CGMS (Sensor, receiver, transmitter) (Medtronic Diabetes) plus the uploading of results to the Internet-based software utility of CareLink Personal and generating reports that can be viewed and used at the patient's own preference. This group will not receive feedback or suggestion based on the uploaded glucose data.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Type 2 diabetes patients being treated with insulin for at least 3 months
- HbA1c \> 7%
- \> 25 years of age
- Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
- Willingness to be trained on using the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System
- Willingness to be randomized
- Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
- Internet Access on a Windows Personal Computer
- No prior use or training on CGMS in the past 6 months
- No prior use or training on IBGMS in the past 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with medical conditions that may affect their study participation or results will be excluded.
- Patients with the potential to become pregnant
- Patients using medications known to influence control of diabetes (eg steroids systemic or inhaled)
- Liver disease (AST or ALT levels \> 2.5 times the reference level)
- Renal insufficient with a serum creatinine level \> 200 μmol/L
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Related Publications (6)
Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, Genuth SM, Lachin JM, Orchard TJ, Raskin P, Zinman B; Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study Research Group. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 22;353(25):2643-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052187.
PMID: 16371630BACKGROUNDIntensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53.
PMID: 9742976BACKGROUNDHirsch IB, Bode BW, Childs BP, Close KL, Fisher WA, Gavin JR, Ginsberg BH, Raine CH, Verderese CA. Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) in insulin- and non-insulin-using adults with diabetes: consensus recommendations for improving SMBG accuracy, utilization, and research. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Dec;10(6):419-39. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0104.
PMID: 18937550BACKGROUNDKlonoff DC, Bergenstal R, Blonde L, Boren SA, Church TS, Gaffaney J, Jovanovic L, Kendall DM, Kollman C, Kovatchev BP, Leippert C, Owens DR, Polonsky WH, Reach G, Renard E, Riddell MC, Rubin RR, Schnell O, Siminiero LM, Vigersky RA, Wilson DM, Wollitzer AO. Consensus report of the coalition for clinical research-self-monitoring of blood glucose. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Nov;2(6):1030-53. doi: 10.1177/193229680800200612.
PMID: 19885292BACKGROUNDAustin MM, Haas L, Johnson T, Parkin CG, Parkin CL, Spollett G, Volpone MT. Self-monitoring of blood glucose: benefits and utilization. Diabetes Educ. 2006 Nov-Dec;32(6):835-6, 844-7. doi: 10.1177/0145721706295873. No abstract available.
PMID: 17102152BACKGROUNDYoo HJ, An HG, Park SY, Ryu OH, Kim HY, Seo JA, Hong EG, Shin DH, Kim YH, Kim SG, Choi KM, Park IB, Yu JM, Baik SH. Use of a real time continuous glucose monitoring system as a motivational device for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;82(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.06.015. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
PMID: 18701183BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hugh D Tildesley, MD
Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2010
First Posted
July 15, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2011
Last Updated
September 11, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-09