A Test of the Effectiveness of a Device and Distraction for Pediatric Immunization Pain
Phase II Study of the Effectiveness of a Device and Distraction for Pediatric Immunization Pain in Multiple Age Groups
2 other identifiers
interventional
345
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The hypothesis of this study is that distraction cards used by the caretaker along with a vibrating cold pack placed proximal to the site of immunization will decrease the pain of routine pediatric immunizations when compared to a placebo device or standard care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Apr 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2011
CompletedJune 22, 2011
June 1, 2011
1 year
June 26, 2010
June 21, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain of immunization
Infants' and toddlers' pain is assessed by coding videotapes using the FLACC (face, legs, activity, crying and consolability) scale. Patients age 4 and older rate pain using self-report via the Faces Pain Scale Revised.
5 minutes during or immediately after immunizations
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pain from immunization using observational measures
5 minutes immediately following immunization
Treatment satisfaction
5 minutes after immunizations
Study Arms (3)
Standard Care
NO INTERVENTIONImmunizations are given with standard care of no pain control
Experimental
ACTIVE COMPARATORVibrating device with cold pack held to arm proximal to injections within the same dermatome; caretakers offered and instructed in use of distraction cards.
Sham Device
SHAM COMPARATORThe device without batteries or cold pack held to arm proximal to injections. No formal distraction.
Interventions
"Buzzy", the vibrating cold pack, is held in place with a velcro strap or pressed by caretaker or nurse immediately prior and during immunizations. The vibration is activated and the device remains in place during the shot, moving locations if multiple shots are given. Distraction cards with pictures on one side and questions on the other are shown to the child while the caretaker asks the finding and seeking questions on the back.
The identical device without batteries or a cold pack is held in place proximal to the site with a velcro strap or pressed by parent or nurse immediately prior to immunizations. The device remains in place throughout the procedure, moving locations to complete multiple shots.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- children receiving routine immunizations
You may not qualify if:
- no caregiver present
- chronic illness requiring frequent injections
- clear cognitive impairments affecting communication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amy Baxter, MD
MMJ Labs LLC
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2010
First Posted
June 29, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
April 1, 2011
Study Completion
April 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 22, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-06