NCT01148472

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of escitalopram with that of duloxetine in outpatients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) after 24 weeks of treatment. The study hypothesis was that there were clinically important differences between the two drugs in terms of efficacy and adverse event profiles.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
294

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4 major-depressive-disorder

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2005

Shorter than P25 for phase_4 major-depressive-disorder

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2005

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2006

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2006

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 17, 2010

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 22, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

November 8, 2016

Status Verified

November 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

June 17, 2010

Last Update Submit

November 7, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Depressive disorder, majorRandomized controlled trialsAntidepressive agents

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To compare the efficacy of escitalopram with that of duloxetine in outpatients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) as assessed by change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at the end of 24 weeks

    24 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • To compare the efficacy of escitalopram with that of duloxetine per visit over the 24-week study period in outpatients with MDD.

    Up to 24 weeks

  • To compare the tolerability and safety of escitalopram with that of duloxetine over the 24-week study period in outpatients with MDD.

    Up to 24 weeks

  • To evaluate the discontinuation emergent signs and symptoms during and after taper-down treatment with escitalopram or duloxetine after 24 weeks of treatment assessed by the Discontinuation Emergent Signs and Symptoms Scale (DESS).

    Up to 24 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Escitalopram

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Escitalopram

Duloxetine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Duloxetine

Interventions

20mg once daily; orally

Also known as: Cipralex, Lexapro
Escitalopram

60mg once daily; orally

Also known as: Cymbalta
Duloxetine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The patient suffers from a primary diagnosis of MDD according to DSM-IV-TR criteria (classification code 296.xx; current episode assessed using the MINI)
  • The patient has a MADRS total score \>=26 and a CGI-S score \>=4 at the Baseline Visit

You may not qualify if:

  • Any current psychiatric disorder other than MDD as defined in the DSM-IV TR
  • Female patients of childbearing potential who are not using effective contraception
  • Use of any psychoactive medication 2 weeks prior to screening and during the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Wade A, Gembert K, Florea I. A comparative study of the efficacy of acute and continuation treatment with escitalopram versus duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jul;23(7):1605-14. doi: 10.1185/030079907x210732.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Major

Interventions

EscitalopramDexetimideDuloxetine Hydrochloride

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PropylaminesAminesOrganic ChemicalsNitrilesBenzofuransHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPiperidonesPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingThiophenesSulfur Compounds

Study Officials

  • Email contact via H. Lundbeck A/S

    LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2010

First Posted

June 22, 2010

Study Start

September 1, 2005

Primary Completion

September 1, 2006

Study Completion

November 1, 2006

Last Updated

November 8, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-11