Computerized Information-Processing Bias Retraining in Depressed Adolescents
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will examine how well a novel four-session computerized program, designed to help adolescents learn to interpret ambiguous situations less negatively, reduces symptoms of depression and decreases negative information-processing biases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Mar 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 12, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2012
CompletedMay 3, 2012
May 1, 2012
2.1 years
April 12, 2010
May 2, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Test of Interpretation Bias (TIB)
The TIB consists of 10 scenarios, similar to the training scenarios except that the last word of all of the scenarios remains ambiguous in valence. Following exposure to each of these ambiguous scenarios, adolescents are given a series of four statements regarding the scenario and asked to rate on a 4-point scale how similar the statement is to their interpretation of the scenario. Two target statements are presented, one with the positive interpretation and one with the negative interpretation. Scores for negative and positive interpretations across the situations can then be calculated.
up to 1 day post-treatment
Test of Interpretation Bias
See above
2-Week Follow-Up
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Kiddie-Schedule of Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Epidemiologic Version (K-SADS-E; Orvaschek & Puig-Antich, 1987)
up to one day Post-Treatment and at 2-Week Follow-Up
Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd Version
up to 1 day Post-Treatment and at 2-Week Follow-Up
State-Trait Anxiety Scale (STAI)
up to 1 day Post-Treatment and 2-Week Follow-Up
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV; First et al, 1997), Mood Disorder Modules only
up to 1 day Post-Treatment and 2-Week Follow-Up
Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS)
up to 1 day post-treatment and at two-week follow-up
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Positive Interpretation Training
EXPERIMENTALFour sessions of positive information-processing training for interpretation of ambiguous scenarios relevant to themes of depression.
Attention Control Training
SHAM COMPARATORFour sessions of interpretation training for "filler" or neutral scenarios, unrelated to themes associated with depression.
Interventions
The intervention consists of the presentation of three-line ambiguous scenarios via a computer program, one line at a time. A disambiguating word fragment completes the scenario (in either a positive or neutral valence, depending on the scenario), after which participants will type the first letter of the word on the keyboard to ensure they are encoding the interpretation valence. The computer will indicate if they have correctly identified the word. This is followed by a Y/N comprehension question. Each session presents 100 training scenarios.
Four sessions of interpretation training for "filler" or neutral scenarios, unrelated to themes associated with depression.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must be between 14-21 years old
- A score of 14 or higher on the Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd Edition (BDI-II)
- Working command of the English language
You may not qualify if:
- Psychosis, current mania, or acute suicidality
- Previous diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder, mental retardation, or severe dyslexia
- Changes in psychiatric medication or psychotherapy within two weeks of entering the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinical and Research Program in Pediatric Psychopharmacology at Massachusetts General Hospital
Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jamie A Micco, PhD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant in Psychology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2010
First Posted
June 22, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
April 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 3, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-05