NCT01147913

Brief Summary

This study will examine how well a novel four-session computerized program, designed to help adolescents learn to interpret ambiguous situations less negatively, reduces symptoms of depression and decreases negative information-processing biases.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2010

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 12, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 22, 2010

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2012

Status Verified

May 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

April 12, 2010

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Major DepressionDepressionAnxietyDysthymia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Test of Interpretation Bias (TIB)

    The TIB consists of 10 scenarios, similar to the training scenarios except that the last word of all of the scenarios remains ambiguous in valence. Following exposure to each of these ambiguous scenarios, adolescents are given a series of four statements regarding the scenario and asked to rate on a 4-point scale how similar the statement is to their interpretation of the scenario. Two target statements are presented, one with the positive interpretation and one with the negative interpretation. Scores for negative and positive interpretations across the situations can then be calculated.

    up to 1 day post-treatment

  • Test of Interpretation Bias

    See above

    2-Week Follow-Up

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Kiddie-Schedule of Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Epidemiologic Version (K-SADS-E; Orvaschek & Puig-Antich, 1987)

    up to one day Post-Treatment and at 2-Week Follow-Up

  • Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd Version

    up to 1 day Post-Treatment and at 2-Week Follow-Up

  • State-Trait Anxiety Scale (STAI)

    up to 1 day Post-Treatment and 2-Week Follow-Up

  • Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV; First et al, 1997), Mood Disorder Modules only

    up to 1 day Post-Treatment and 2-Week Follow-Up

  • Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS)

    up to 1 day post-treatment and at two-week follow-up

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Positive Interpretation Training

EXPERIMENTAL

Four sessions of positive information-processing training for interpretation of ambiguous scenarios relevant to themes of depression.

Behavioral: Computerized Information-Processing Bias Retraining

Attention Control Training

SHAM COMPARATOR

Four sessions of interpretation training for "filler" or neutral scenarios, unrelated to themes associated with depression.

Behavioral: Attention Control Training

Interventions

The intervention consists of the presentation of three-line ambiguous scenarios via a computer program, one line at a time. A disambiguating word fragment completes the scenario (in either a positive or neutral valence, depending on the scenario), after which participants will type the first letter of the word on the keyboard to ensure they are encoding the interpretation valence. The computer will indicate if they have correctly identified the word. This is followed by a Y/N comprehension question. Each session presents 100 training scenarios.

Positive Interpretation Training

Four sessions of interpretation training for "filler" or neutral scenarios, unrelated to themes associated with depression.

Attention Control Training

Eligibility Criteria

Age14 Years - 21 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants must be between 14-21 years old
  • A score of 14 or higher on the Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd Edition (BDI-II)
  • Working command of the English language

You may not qualify if:

  • Psychosis, current mania, or acute suicidality
  • Previous diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder, mental retardation, or severe dyslexia
  • Changes in psychiatric medication or psychotherapy within two weeks of entering the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinical and Research Program in Pediatric Psychopharmacology at Massachusetts General Hospital

Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, MajorDepressionAnxiety DisordersDysthymic Disorder

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental DisordersBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Jamie A Micco, PhD

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant in Psychology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2010

First Posted

June 22, 2010

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion

April 1, 2012

Study Completion

April 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 3, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-05

Locations