A Prospective, Multicenter Observational Study on MAST™ (Minimal Access Spinal Technologies) Fusion Procedures for the Treatment of the Degenerative Lumbar Spine
MASTERS-D
1 other identifier
observational
255
14 countries
19
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to observe and document surgical practice and evaluate patients' outcomes following a MAST™ single or double level instrumented fusion procedure using PLIF (Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion) or TLIF (Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion) techniques for the treatment of the degenerative lumbar spine in a "real-world" patient population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2010
Typical duration for all trials
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 19, 2014
CompletedJanuary 8, 2019
January 1, 2016
2.9 years
June 11, 2010
May 23, 2014
December 17, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Time From Surgery to First Ambulation.
The primary objective of the study is to access the short term recovery (from surgery to hospital discharge) since the minimally invasive lumbar fusion techniques are expected to be associated with immediate short-term benefits. Patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures are reported to recover earlier from surgery particularly with a shorter time to first ambulation and shorter discharge as compared to the standard open procedures. Outcome measure timeframe for time from surgery to first ambulation is assessed up to hospital discharge as pts are all ambulated before discharge from the hospital.
From date of Surgery to date of First ambulation, assessed up to hospital discharge.
Time to Surgery Recovery Day.
The primary objective of the study is to access the short term recovery (from surgery to discharge) since the minimally invasive lumbar fusion techniques are expected to be associated with immediate short-term benefits. Patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures are reported to recover earlier from surgery particularly with a shorter time to first ambulation and shorter discharge as compared to the standard open procedures. Surgery recovery day is defined as the day when patients fulfils following criteria : patient no longer needs intravenous infusion of analgesic drugs, there are no surgery related complications (AEs) impending discharge of patient, patient no longer needs nursing care. The objective of the surgery recovery day assessment is to collect the day when the patient could be discharged based on his actual clinical condition because the effective day of discharge may be prolonged by factors other than the patient's clinical recovery such as social factors.
From date of surgery until date of surgery recovery day assessed up to hospital discharge.
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Back Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score as Compared to Baseline.
Baseline, 12 months
Leg Pain Intensity VAS Score as Compared to Baseline
Baseline, 12 months
EQ-5D Questionnaire (When it is a Routine Practice) as Compared to Baseline.
Baseline, 12 months
Fusion Rate as Assessed by CT Scan or X-Rays, in Those Sites Where This Assessment is Standard of Care.
12 months
Number of Patients Who Utilized Rehabilitation Programs
From 6-12 months after the day of surgery
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
MAST™ procedure
Interventions
Single or double level instrumented fusion receiving the CD Horizon® Spinal System using PLIF or TLIF techniques via a MAST™ procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
The patient population comprises individuals that have an indication for a single or double level instrumented lumbar fusion for the treatment of the degenerative lumbar spine causing back and/or leg pain. Patients enrolled in this study will receive a single or double level instrumented fusion using PLIF or TLIF techniques via a MAST™ procedure.
You may qualify if:
- Patient is \>18 years of age (or minimum age as required by local regulations).
- Patient has indication for a single or double level instrumented lumbar fusion for the treatment of the degenerative lumbar spine.
- Patient agrees to participate in the study and is able to sign the Data Release Form/Informed Consent.
- The procedure planned for the patient complies with the labeling of the Devices that may be used in the surgical procedure as described in the section B.2 Device Information.
- Patient is planned to be submitted to the fusion procedure using PLIF or TLIF techniques and to receive a CD HORIZON® Spinal System via a MAST™ approach.
- The patient is willing and is able to cooperate with study procedures and required follow-up visits.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient that has already undergone an open lumbar spine surgery other than microdiscectomy.
- Indications for the procedure other than degenerative spine disease like Osteoporotic vertebral fractures, Spine trauma fractures and Spine tumor.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (19)
Klinikum Amstetten
Amstetten, Austria
OLV Ziekenhuis
Aalst, Belgium
Spine, Sports Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
Karvinska Hornicka Nemocnice
Fryštát, Czechia
Klinikum Kulmbach
Kulmbach, Bavaria, Germany
Marienhaus Klinikum
Bendorf, Germany
Neurochirurgische Universitatsklinik
Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg
Magdeburg, Germany
Mediterraneo
Glyfada, Greece
The Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv, Israel
Instituto Ortopedici Rizzoli
Bologna, Italy
Fatebenefratelli Hospital
Milan, Italy
Bergman Clinics
Naarden, Netherlands
Franciscus Ziekenhuis Roosendaal
Roosendaal, Netherlands
University Clinical Center
Gdansk, Poland
Hospital San Joao
Porto, Portugal
Ustredna Vojenska Nemocnica SNP
Ružomberok, Slovakia
Hospital Clinic De Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036, Spain
Guys & St; Thomas NHS Trust
London, United Kingdom
Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of this study include the lack of a direct comparison of outcomes of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery, since it was designed as an observational trial and not designed as a randomized controlled trial.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Christel Van Dam
- Organization
- MedtronicSpineECA
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jörg Franke, PD Dr.
Klinik für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie; Dortmund
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2010
First Posted
June 14, 2010
Study Start
June 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
August 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 8, 2019
Results First Posted
August 19, 2014
Record last verified: 2016-01