NCT01141972

Brief Summary

Specific Aim 1: To compare effects of Vitamin D supplementation to usual care on symptoms in women transitioning to early postmenopause and determine the associated effect size in order to conduct a power analysis for a future RCT. Hypothesis: Vitamin D insufficient women in early postmenopause who are randomized to supplementation, titrated to achieve sufficiency for 2 months, will have fewer symptoms including hot flashes, mood, and musculoskeletal complaints than women randomized to usual care. Specific Aim 2: To compare effects of Vitamin D supplementation to usual care on body composition (by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry \[DXA\] and by weight, BMI, waist to hip ratio) in overweight/obese women transitioning to early postmenopause and determine the associated effect size for a power analysis for a future RCT. Hypothesis: Vitamin D insufficient women in the menopausal transition randomized to supplementation, titrated to achieve sufficiency for 9 months, will improve DXA body composition (less total body and abdominal fat), compared to women in usual care, who will have increased body weight, including total and abdominal fat. Specific Aim 3: To estimate the proportion of overweight/obese middle-aged women who achieve sufficiency by 1 month versus 2 or more months and to determine if achieving sufficiency by 1 month varies by baseline characteristics. Hypothesis: About 80% of participants will achieve sufficient Vitamin D level by 1 month. Those who need more than 1 month for sufficiency will have lower baseline levels and higher initial BMI.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2010

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 9, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 11, 2010

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2010

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

May 30, 2013

Status Verified

May 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

June 9, 2010

Last Update Submit

May 28, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Vitamin DObesityMenopauseHot Flashes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • compare effects of Vitamin D supplementation to usual care on symptoms in women transitioning to early postmenopause and determine the associated effects

    Vitamin D levels will be measured at baseline, after dose adjustments, and at the 3 month and final visit.

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • compare effects of Vitamin D supplementation to usual care on body composition (by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] and by weight, BMI, waist to hip ratio) in overweight/obese women transitioning to early postmenopause

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

Supplement

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

We will administer 100,000 IU Vitamin D3 orally as an observed 1-time bolus and then prescribe 1000 IU by mouth daily. These doses have achieved sufficiency in other populations.99, 100 We will use the level of sufficiency (≥30 ng/ml \[≥75 nmol/L\]) that is recommended by most experts in the field.89-91, 93, 95, 96, 101-105 We will repeat the bolus at 1 month if the target level is not achieved. The control group will receive matching placebo and a similar proportion will go through a dummy titration. All women consuming less than 800 mg/day of calcium (by dietary history) will receive 500 mg of calcium to ensure sufficiency

Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Current standard of practice does not dictate that otherwise healthy early menopausal women have Vitamin D levels evaluated. Women with Vitamin D levels between 10 and 29 ng/ml who receive placebo will be receiving usual care (i.e., no additional Vitamin D repletion above intake at the time of screening).

Other: Placebo

Interventions

Vitamin DDIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

We will administer 100,000 IU Vitamin D3 orally as an observed 1-time bolus and then prescribe 1000 IU by mouth daily. These doses have achieved sufficiency in other populations.99, 100 We will use the level of sufficiency (≥30 ng/ml \[≥75 nmol/L\]) that is recommended by most experts in the field.89-91, 93, 95, 96, 101-105 We will repeat the bolus at 1 month if the target level is not achieved. The control group will receive matching placebo and a similar proportion will go through a dummy titration. All women consuming less than 800 mg/day of calcium (by dietary history) will receive 500 mg of calcium to ensure sufficiency.

Supplement
PlaceboOTHER

Current standard of practice does not dictate that otherwise healthy early menopausal women have Vitamin D levels evaluated. Women with Vitamin D levels between 10 and 29 ng/ml who receive placebo will be receiving usual care (i.e., no additional Vitamin D repletion above intake at the time of screening).

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 60 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Women in late menopausal transition or early menopause
  • Age 40-55
  • BMI \>25 kg/m2
  • Suffer from menopausal symptoms
  • Change in previously regular cycles consisting of at least ≥2 skipped cycles and an interval of amenorrhea (≥60 days) in the last year
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Vitamin D insufficiency (\<30 ng/ml)
  • Weight stability (+/- 5%) for 3 months

You may not qualify if:

  • No period for \>12 months
  • Hormone use (i.e. menopausal hormone therapy, oral contraceptive, other hormonal medications) in last 3 months
  • History of hysterectomy more than 11 months ago
  • Abnormal screening blood tests (i.e. elevated serum calcium level, elevated creatinine)
  • History of medical conditions where Vitamin D supplementation is not indicated (i.e. chronic renal insufficiency, elevated calcium, sarcoidosis or other granulomatous disease, lymphoma, or tuberculosis
  • History of osteoporosis or osteoporosis on baseline DXA (expect less than 4% of screened population)84
  • Vitamin D deficiency (\<10 ng/ml) as we felt it was unethical to withhold supplementation for 12 months in severe deficiency (according to our KPNW survey, this will exclude \<2% of population)
  • Consuming more than 400 IU of Vitamin D supplementation daily (we felt such doses taken outside of the study design could confound results)
  • Current smoker (within the last year)
  • Taking medications that affect body weight
  • Prior bariatric surgery
  • Taking medications or herbal supplements that affect mood (i.e. antidepressants) or menopausal symptoms (i.e. herbal meds) or sleep
  • Weighing more than 400 pounds (cannot fit on DEXA scan)
  • Not fluent in English or cognitively impaired

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research

Portland, Oregon, 97227, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hot FlashesMenopause, PrematureObesityVitamin D Deficiency

Interventions

Vitamin D

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsOvarian DiseasesAdnexal DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesOverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightAvitaminosisDeficiency DiseasesMalnutrition

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SecosteroidsSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Erin S. LeBlanc, MD, MPH

    Kaiser Permanente

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2010

First Posted

June 11, 2010

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion

February 1, 2012

Study Completion

February 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 30, 2013

Record last verified: 2012-05

Locations