The Role of Vitamin D in Menopause: Relationship to Menopausal Symptoms in Body Composition
FLASH
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Specific Aim 1: To compare effects of Vitamin D supplementation to usual care on symptoms in women transitioning to early postmenopause and determine the associated effect size in order to conduct a power analysis for a future RCT. Hypothesis: Vitamin D insufficient women in early postmenopause who are randomized to supplementation, titrated to achieve sufficiency for 2 months, will have fewer symptoms including hot flashes, mood, and musculoskeletal complaints than women randomized to usual care. Specific Aim 2: To compare effects of Vitamin D supplementation to usual care on body composition (by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry \[DXA\] and by weight, BMI, waist to hip ratio) in overweight/obese women transitioning to early postmenopause and determine the associated effect size for a power analysis for a future RCT. Hypothesis: Vitamin D insufficient women in the menopausal transition randomized to supplementation, titrated to achieve sufficiency for 9 months, will improve DXA body composition (less total body and abdominal fat), compared to women in usual care, who will have increased body weight, including total and abdominal fat. Specific Aim 3: To estimate the proportion of overweight/obese middle-aged women who achieve sufficiency by 1 month versus 2 or more months and to determine if achieving sufficiency by 1 month varies by baseline characteristics. Hypothesis: About 80% of participants will achieve sufficient Vitamin D level by 1 month. Those who need more than 1 month for sufficiency will have lower baseline levels and higher initial BMI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Sep 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2012
CompletedMay 30, 2013
May 1, 2012
1.4 years
June 9, 2010
May 28, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
compare effects of Vitamin D supplementation to usual care on symptoms in women transitioning to early postmenopause and determine the associated effects
Vitamin D levels will be measured at baseline, after dose adjustments, and at the 3 month and final visit.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
compare effects of Vitamin D supplementation to usual care on body composition (by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] and by weight, BMI, waist to hip ratio) in overweight/obese women transitioning to early postmenopause
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Supplement
ACTIVE COMPARATORWe will administer 100,000 IU Vitamin D3 orally as an observed 1-time bolus and then prescribe 1000 IU by mouth daily. These doses have achieved sufficiency in other populations.99, 100 We will use the level of sufficiency (≥30 ng/ml \[≥75 nmol/L\]) that is recommended by most experts in the field.89-91, 93, 95, 96, 101-105 We will repeat the bolus at 1 month if the target level is not achieved. The control group will receive matching placebo and a similar proportion will go through a dummy titration. All women consuming less than 800 mg/day of calcium (by dietary history) will receive 500 mg of calcium to ensure sufficiency
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORCurrent standard of practice does not dictate that otherwise healthy early menopausal women have Vitamin D levels evaluated. Women with Vitamin D levels between 10 and 29 ng/ml who receive placebo will be receiving usual care (i.e., no additional Vitamin D repletion above intake at the time of screening).
Interventions
We will administer 100,000 IU Vitamin D3 orally as an observed 1-time bolus and then prescribe 1000 IU by mouth daily. These doses have achieved sufficiency in other populations.99, 100 We will use the level of sufficiency (≥30 ng/ml \[≥75 nmol/L\]) that is recommended by most experts in the field.89-91, 93, 95, 96, 101-105 We will repeat the bolus at 1 month if the target level is not achieved. The control group will receive matching placebo and a similar proportion will go through a dummy titration. All women consuming less than 800 mg/day of calcium (by dietary history) will receive 500 mg of calcium to ensure sufficiency.
Current standard of practice does not dictate that otherwise healthy early menopausal women have Vitamin D levels evaluated. Women with Vitamin D levels between 10 and 29 ng/ml who receive placebo will be receiving usual care (i.e., no additional Vitamin D repletion above intake at the time of screening).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women in late menopausal transition or early menopause
- Age 40-55
- BMI \>25 kg/m2
- Suffer from menopausal symptoms
- Change in previously regular cycles consisting of at least ≥2 skipped cycles and an interval of amenorrhea (≥60 days) in the last year
- Negative pregnancy test
- Vitamin D insufficiency (\<30 ng/ml)
- Weight stability (+/- 5%) for 3 months
You may not qualify if:
- No period for \>12 months
- Hormone use (i.e. menopausal hormone therapy, oral contraceptive, other hormonal medications) in last 3 months
- History of hysterectomy more than 11 months ago
- Abnormal screening blood tests (i.e. elevated serum calcium level, elevated creatinine)
- History of medical conditions where Vitamin D supplementation is not indicated (i.e. chronic renal insufficiency, elevated calcium, sarcoidosis or other granulomatous disease, lymphoma, or tuberculosis
- History of osteoporosis or osteoporosis on baseline DXA (expect less than 4% of screened population)84
- Vitamin D deficiency (\<10 ng/ml) as we felt it was unethical to withhold supplementation for 12 months in severe deficiency (according to our KPNW survey, this will exclude \<2% of population)
- Consuming more than 400 IU of Vitamin D supplementation daily (we felt such doses taken outside of the study design could confound results)
- Current smoker (within the last year)
- Taking medications that affect body weight
- Prior bariatric surgery
- Taking medications or herbal supplements that affect mood (i.e. antidepressants) or menopausal symptoms (i.e. herbal meds) or sleep
- Weighing more than 400 pounds (cannot fit on DEXA scan)
- Not fluent in English or cognitively impaired
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kaiser Permanentelead
- Oregon Health and Science Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research
Portland, Oregon, 97227, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Erin S. LeBlanc, MD, MPH
Kaiser Permanente
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2010
First Posted
June 11, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2012
Study Completion
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 30, 2013
Record last verified: 2012-05