NCT01139229

Brief Summary

The investigators improved the hybrid everted esophagogastrostomy and expected to prevent the incidence of anastomotic stricture. The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical value of this kind of operation type, and analyzes the clinicopathological factors causing the postoperative complications.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
144

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2007

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2007

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2007

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2008

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 3, 2010

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 8, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

June 8, 2010

Status Verified

March 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

June 3, 2010

Last Update Submit

June 7, 2010

Conditions

Keywords

EsophagogastrostomyCircular everted anastomosisSide-side anastomosisRandomized clinical trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • the incidence of anastomotic stricture

    the anastomotic stricture is defined as the diameter of the anastomotic orifice \<= 0.8 cm on esophagogram

    three months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • The grades of dysphagia

    three months

  • the grades of acid regurgitation

    three months

  • the clinicopathological parameters in relation to postoperative complications

    three months

Study Arms (3)

HE group

OTHER
Other: hybrid everted esophagogastric anastomosis

HS group

OTHER
Other: the conventional hand-sewn anastomosis

SA group

OTHER
Other: a stapled anastomosis

Interventions

Also known as: no other names
HE group
Also known as: no other names
HS group
Also known as: no other names
SA group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • pathologically diagnosed esophageal neoplasms
  • undergoing the Esophagogastrostomy

You may not qualify if:

  • the patients with previous the upper gastrointestinal tract surgery
  • the esophageal carcinoma patients with previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • the esophageal carcinoma complicated other esophagogastric diseases

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (6)

  • Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1997 Aug;226(2):169-73. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199708000-00008.

  • Behzadi A, Nichols FC, Cassivi SD, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Pairolero PC. Esophagogastrectomy: the influence of stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis on outcome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005 Nov;9(8):1031-40; discussion 1040-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.025.

  • Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D; CONSORT Group. The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001. Explore (NY). 2005 Jan;1(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2004.11.001.

  • Zhu ZJ, Zhao YF, Chen LQ, Hu Y, Liu LX, Wang Y, Kou YL. Clinical application of layered anastomosis during esophagogastrostomy. World J Surg. 2008 Apr;32(4):583-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9396-5.

  • Laterza E, de' Manzoni G, Veraldi GF, Guglielmi A, Tedesco P, Cordiano C. Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial. Eur J Surg. 1999 Nov;165(11):1051-4. doi: 10.1080/110241599750007883.

  • Wang WP, Gao Q, Wang KN, Shi H, Chen LQ. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. World J Surg. 2013 May;37(5):1043-50. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1932-x.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsHead and Neck NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Qi L Chen

    the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Huaxi Hospital of Sichuan University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2010

First Posted

June 8, 2010

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion

November 1, 2007

Study Completion

September 1, 2008

Last Updated

June 8, 2010

Record last verified: 2010-03