Idiopathic Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis (IRAP)
IRAP
The IRAP Registry is a Multi-center Prospective, Collaborative Database Designed to Create a National Registry That Collects Information Concerning Episodes of Idiopathic Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis From Major 'Pancreas' Centers. Intent is to do a Comparative Effectiveness Study of Interventions.
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to collect standardized data on the diagnosis and management of idiopathic (unknown cause) recurrent acute pancreatitis. The intent is to collect data for at least five years to obtain information regarding long-term outcomes and obtain comparative effectiveness data.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jun 2010
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 28, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 31, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedOctober 3, 2024
June 1, 2014
3.5 years
May 28, 2010
October 1, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
IDIOPATHIC RECURRENT ACUTE PANCREATITIS (IRAP)
Expect 750 to be treated with ERCP Expect 250 to be treated with conservative treatment. Therefore, the smaller group was used for the sample size analysis. Smallest difference in QOL for treatment is expected to be 10-20%. For smaller of two treatment groups (N=250), no effect would be 0 got better and 250 did not. If 10% of the subjects improved, 25 would get better and 225 would not. Result: Chi-square analysis yielded a highly significantly difference as follows. Chi-square= 24.253 with 1 degrees of freedom. (P = \<0.001). Yates correction for continuity was used in calculating this test.An alternate analysis is that for no effect, 125 subjects would get better and 125 patients would not (random effects model).
The goal is to recruit 1000 subjects in 5 years.
Study Arms (1)
Pancreatitis, acute, recurrent
Patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis where the cause is unknown
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects with recurrent pancreatitis presenting to major centers for pancreatic disorders
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- Able to provide consent
- More than one documented episode of pancreatitis (\>3 fold elevation of amylase and or lipase with abdominal pain or with body imaging consistent with pancreatitis: need two of the three)
- Subjects with abdominal pain and enzyme elevation which is \<3 fold above normal or absence of imaging findings: these subjects who are undergoing endoscopic interventions but do not fit the "classic criteria" for pancreatitis will be included but the analysis of data of these subjects would be done separately.
- Note: subjects with a diagnosis of pancreas divisum and or Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction diagnosed prior to or after entry into the study will be included in the study but their data will be analyzed separately because of the controversy regarding the association of these entities with pancreatitis.
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to give informed consent.
- Definite evidence of biliary or alcoholic pancreatitis.
- Clear evidence of hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis (triglycerides \>1,000 mg/dl).
- Post-ERCP pancreatitis, drug-induced pancreatitis, or any identifiable cause for pancreatitis.
- History of pancreatic surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aurora St. Lukes Medical Center of Aurora Health Care
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nalini M Guda, MD
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 28, 2010
First Posted
May 31, 2010
Study Start
June 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2014-06