Efficacy and Safety of Lucentis for Clinically Significant Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
BRAVO
A Randomized, Controlled, Two-center Phase II Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Lucentis Injections in Patients With Clinically Significant Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study aims to assess if Lucentis injection applied into the eye is superior to conventional treatment concerning the prevention of visual loss in patients having clinically significant macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Aug 2009
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2011
CompletedMay 14, 2010
May 1, 2010
2.1 years
May 12, 2010
May 13, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy compared to conventional treatment assessed by BCVA(best corrected visual acuity)
To assess the superiority of intravitreal (IVT) ranibizumab to conventional treatment concerning prevention of visual loss or improvement of BCVA as determined by the mean change of BCVA tested by ETDRS chart compared to baseline in 12 months period, when intravitreal ranibizumab is applied monthly in the first 3 months period, and later when visual acuity (VA) decreases with more than 5 letters at any visit performed monthly.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy assessed by change in macular thickness
12 months with monthly assessment
Study Arms (2)
Lucentis (ranibizumab)
EXPERIMENTALLaser
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
applied monthly in the first 3 months period, and after this only if visual acuity (VA) decreases with more than 5 letters at any monthly visits
Conventional grid pattern argon laser treatment and panretinal argon laser photocoagulation in an as needed basis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Macular edema persisting for more than 3 months period despite conventional medication.
- Central retinal vein occlusion is confirmed by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and fluorescein angiography (FLAG).
- Patients randomized into ranibizumab-treated group do not receive macular laser treatment.
- Macular edema is defined by OCT: the thickness of central foveal area calculated by macular map analysis is above 280 μm and/or retinal thickness is above 330 μm at any region of the macula calculated by retinal thickness analysis.
- Baseline visual acuity is less than 64 ETDRS letters (or 0.4 decimal equivalent).
You may not qualify if:
- Diabetes mellitus
- Additional vitreoretinal diseases
- History of pars plana vitrectomy
- Previous macular grid laser treatment
- Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonid treatment
- Complicated cataract surgery
- Advanced glaucomatous damage of optic nerve head
- Cataract (except mild, defined as grade 1 nuclear sclerosis and/or grade 1 posterior subcapsular cataract)
- Age-related macular degeneration
- Pregnancy and lactation
- Women in childbearing potential who are not using double safe contraception
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Pecslead
- University of Debrecencollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center Dept of Ophthalmology
Debrecen, H-4012, Hungary
University of Pecs, Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology
Pécs, H-7624, Hungary
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zsolt Balla, MD PhD
University of Pecs
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2010
First Posted
May 14, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2009
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
May 14, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-05