Trial of Otelixizumab for Adolescents and Adults With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (Autoimmune): DEFEND-2
DEFEND-2
Durable-Response Therapy Evaluation For Early- or New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes
2 other identifiers
interventional
179
1 country
1
Brief Summary
DEFEND-2 is a Phase 3 confirmatory study for the Phase 3 DEFEND-1 study. The study objective is to find out if an 8-day series of otelixizumab infusions leads to greater improvement in insulin secretion as compared with placebo. Insulin secretion will be assessed using mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide. Subjects will be assigned to receive either otelixizumab or placebo at a ratio of 2:1 (2/3 otelixizumab, 1/3 placebo). These study agents will be administered as an addition to insulin, diet, and other standard of care treatments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started May 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 17, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 9, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 9, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 15, 2017
CompletedSeptember 15, 2017
August 1, 2017
1.8 years
May 11, 2010
August 17, 2017
August 17, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Mixed Meal-stimulated C-peptide Area Under Curve (AUC) (Normalized for 120-minute Time Interval) at Month 12
C-peptide is a protein that shows how much insulin the body is producing. For 3 days before the mixed meal tolerance test participants were asked to eat a balanced diet. The test was performed only when the finger-stick blood glucose level was above 70 mg per deciliter (mg/dL) and no higher than 200 mg/dL. Mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC was the area under the C-peptide/time curve from time 0 to 120-minutes, calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This AUC was normalized for time interval by dividing it by 120-minutes (the number of minutes over which it was determined), and was adjusted by inclusion of Baseline C-peptide AUC as a covariate in the analysis. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the value at Month 12 from the Baseline value.
Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Mixed Meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC (Normalized for 120-minute Time Interval) at Week 12 and 6 Months
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12, Month 6
Change From Baseline in Stimulated C-Peptide Mean AUC at Week 12, Month 6, 12 and 18
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12, Month 6, 12, 18
Number of Participants With Responder Status
Month 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Insulin Use Over 7 Consecutive Days During the 2 Weeks Prior to the Assessment
Baseline (Day 1) and Month 3, 6, 12
Change From Baseline in HbA1c Levels Over 7 Consecutive Days During the 2 Weeks Prior to the Assessment
Baseline (Day 1) and Month 3, 6, 12
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
otelixizumab
EXPERIMENTALotelixizumab
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORplacebo
Interventions
infusion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages 12-17
- Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, consistent with ADA criteria
- No more than 90 days between diagnosis and administration of study compounds
- Requires insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus, or has required insulin at some time between diagnosis and administration of study compounds. In Canada, has to be using insulin at the time of dosing.
- Stimulated C-peptide level greater than 0.20 nmol/L and less than or equal to 3.50 nmol/L
- Positive for one or more of the autoantibodies typically associated with T1DM: antibody to glutamic acid decarboxylase (anti-GAD); antibody to protein tyrosine phosphatase-like protein (anti-IA-2); zinc transporter autoantibodies (ZNT8); insulin autoantibodies (IAA). A subject who is positive for insulin autoantibodies (IAA) and negative for the other autoantibodies will only be eligible if the subject has used insulin for less than 7 days total.
You may not qualify if:
- Other, significant medical conditions based on the study doctor's evaluation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
- Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
GSK Investigational Site
Roma, 00155, Italy
Related Publications (3)
Keymeulen B, Vandemeulebroucke E, Ziegler AG, Mathieu C, Kaufman L, Hale G, Gorus F, Goldman M, Walter M, Candon S, Schandene L, Crenier L, De Block C, Seigneurin JM, De Pauw P, Pierard D, Weets I, Rebello P, Bird P, Berrie E, Frewin M, Waldmann H, Bach JF, Pipeleers D, Chatenoud L. Insulin needs after CD3-antibody therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 23;352(25):2598-608. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043980.
PMID: 15972866BACKGROUNDKeymeulen B, Walter M, Mathieu C, Kaufman L, Gorus F, Hilbrands R, Vandemeulebroucke E, Van de Velde U, Crenier L, De Block C, Candon S, Waldmann H, Ziegler AG, Chatenoud L, Pipeleers D. Four-year metabolic outcome of a randomised controlled CD3-antibody trial in recent-onset type 1 diabetic patients depends on their age and baseline residual beta cell mass. Diabetologia. 2010 Apr;53(4):614-23. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1644-9. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
PMID: 20225393BACKGROUNDYou S, Candon S, Kuhn C, Bach JF, Chatenoud L. CD3 antibodies as unique tools to restore self-tolerance in established autoimmunity their mode of action and clinical application in type 1 diabetes. Adv Immunol. 2008;100:13-37. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(08)00802-X. No abstract available.
PMID: 19111162BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2010
First Posted
May 14, 2010
Study Start
May 17, 2010
Primary Completion
March 9, 2012
Study Completion
March 9, 2012
Last Updated
September 15, 2017
Results First Posted
September 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.