Comparison of Colesevelam Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Powder For Oral Suspension Versus Generic Cholestyramine Through Use of the Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale
A Randomized, Single-Blind, Single Research Site, Comparison of Colesevelam Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Powder For Oral Suspension Versus Generic Cholestyramine Through Use of the Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale in Generally Healthy Subjects
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the acceptability of Colesevelam HCl powder for oral suspension versus generic cholestyramine via the BASA scale, based upon an anticipated equivalent cholesterol lowering doses of each comparator drug.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 healthy
Started Apr 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 13, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 7, 2010
CompletedOctober 7, 2010
September 1, 2010
2 months
May 7, 2010
July 19, 2010
September 22, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Acceptability of Colesevelam HCl Powder for Oral Suspension vs. Generic Cholestyramine Via the Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale, Based Upon an Anticipated Equivalent Cholesterol Lowering Doses of Each Comparator Drug.
The bile acid sequestrant acceptability (BASA) scale has 4 scoring categories: taste, texture, appearance, and mixability. Participants rank each category separately. The best possible score for each category is 5, and the worst possible score for each category is 1.
1 Day
Other Outcomes (1)
Weighted vs. Unweighted Composite BASA Scale Scores
1 Day
Study Arms (2)
Cholestyramine 12 grams
ACTIVE COMPARATORCholestyramine 12 grams
Colesevelam HCl
ACTIVE COMPARATORColesevelam HCl, 4 grams
Interventions
Cholestyramine 12 grams, one time dose
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men or women 18-70 years of age
- Subjects are capable of giving informed consent, or if appropriate, have an acceptable surrogate capable of giving consent on the subject's behalf.
- Subjects are willing and readily able to be contacted for post-study safety phone call assessments one to seven days after the single study visit.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior intolerance to bile acid sequestrants
- Known Phenylketonuria. Colesevelam (Welchol) for Oral Suspension contains 48 mg phenylalanine per 3.75 gram dose.
- Women who are either pregnant, or who are not practicing any form of birth control.
- Prior gastrointestinal surgery
- History of ongoing gastrointestinal symptoms (indigestion, constipation, or diarrhea)
- History of bowel obstruction, malabsorption, or irritable bowel syndrome
- History of esophageal disease
- Current or past history of gallbladder disease
- History of pancreatitis
- Subjects enrolled in another experimental (interventional) protocol within the past 30 days prior to visit 1.
- Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
- Known history of triglyceride levels \> 300 mg/dl.
- History of alcohol or drug abuse within 1 year of study entry
- Alcohol intake that exceeds more than 2 units of alcohol drinks per day
- Exposure to bile acid sequestrants (colesevelam HCl, cholestyramine, colestipol within 30 days of visit 1).
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Centerlead
- Provident Clinical Researchcollaborator
- Daiichi Sankyocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
L-MARC Research Center
Louisville, Kentucky, 40213, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Used generally healthy subjects, for who lipid-altering medication may not be indicated; Compared the BAS on the same day; Evaluated estimated equal cholesterol lowering doses of each BAS, rather than same g amt of active drug
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Harold E. Bays, MD
- Organization
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (L-MARC)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harold E Bays, MD
L-MARC Research Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2010
First Posted
May 13, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
June 1, 2010
Study Completion
June 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 7, 2010
Results First Posted
October 7, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-09