NCT01121575

Brief Summary

Lung cancer tumors become resistant to the first generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors erlotinib or gefitinib by changing and increasing the activity of two cell signaling pathways: the cMET pathway and the EGFR pathway. Both resistance mechanisms can occur at the same time, in the same patient and even in the same tumor. This study combines a second generation EGFR inhibitor and a cMET inhibitor to block both these pathways in order to overcome resistance and treat this disease.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2010

Typical duration for phase_1

Geographic Reach
2 countries

10 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 10, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 12, 2010

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2010

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2014

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 30, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

October 28, 2015

Status Verified

October 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

May 10, 2010

Results QC Date

February 11, 2015

Last Update Submit

October 6, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Phase 1 acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib cMET inhibitor EGFR inhibitor panHER inhibitor combination trial Crizotinib

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Overview of Treatment-emergent All Causalities Adverse Events (AEs) in Escalation Phase

    AE was any untoward medical occurrence with study drug/ device in a trial participant. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.

    Up to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)

  • Overview of Treatment-emergent All Causalities AEs in Expansion Phase

    AE was any untoward medical occurrence with study drug/ device in a trial participant. SAE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using NCI CTCAE v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.

    Up to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)

  • Overview of Treatment-emergent, Treatment-related AEs in Escalation Phase

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study treatment in a participant who received study treatment. SAE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using NCI CTCAE v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.

    Up to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)

  • Overview of Treatment-emergent, Treatment-related AEs in Expansion Phase

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study treatment in a participant who received study treatment. SAE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using NCI CTCAE v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.

    Up to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)

  • Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Escalation Phase

    DLTs were those AEs which occurred in Cycle 1 of treatment in Dose Escalation Phase which may be attributed to study drug \[combined Crizotinib (PF-02341066) plus Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)\] without a clear alternative explanation and despite the use of adequate/maximal medical intervention as dictated by local institutional clinical practices or the judgment of the investigator. The following events were considered DLTs (using CTCAE version 4.02);1. Grade ≥4 hematologic events. 2. Grade ≥3 non-hematological events (except Grade 3/4 asymptomatic hypophosphatemia and Grade 3/4 hyperuricemia without signs and symptoms of gout). Nausea, vomiting or diarrhea had to have persisted at Grade 3 or 4 despite maximal medical therapy. Grade 3 hypertension will be considered a DLT only if the event is unmanageable by standard approved pharmacologic agents or if the symptomatic sequelae are identified despite appropriate medical intervention.

    Cycle 1 (4 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (37)

  • Number of Participants With Stable Disease and Stable Disease Duration in Escalation Phase

    From objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)

  • Number of Participants With Stable Disease and Stable Disease Duration in Expansion Phase

    From objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)

  • Number of Participants With Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Escalation Phase

    From objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)

  • Number of Participants With ORR in Expansion Phase

    From objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)

  • Duration of Response for the Only Participant Shown Partial Response in Expansion Phase

    From objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)

  • +32 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Arm 1

EXPERIMENTAL

PF-02341066 AND PF-00299804: Patients will be treated with combined cMET inhibitor (PF-02341066) and panHER inhibitor (PF-00299804).

Drug: PF-02341066Drug: PF-00299804

Arm 2

EXPERIMENTAL

PF-00299804 FOLLOWED BY COMBINED PF-02341066 AND PF-00299804: Patients will be treated with single agent panHER inhibitor (PF-00299804) until disease progression and then with the maximum tolerated combined dose of cMET inhibitor (PF-02341066) and panHER inhibitor (PF-00299804).

Drug: PF-02341066Drug: PF-00299804

Interventions

Arm 1: The starting dose will be 30 mg by mouth once a day of PF-0029804 in tablet form. The dose of each drug in the combination \[PF-02341066 and PF-00299804\] will be escalated or de-escalated until the maximum tolerated combined dose is reached. Patients will then be treated with the maximum tolerated combined dose.

Also known as: panHER inhibitor
Arm 1

Arm 1: The starting dose will be 200 mg by mouth, twice a day of PF 02341066 in tablet form The dose of each drug in the combination \[PF-02341066 and PF-00299804\] will be escalated or de-escalated until the maximum tolerated combined dose is reached. Patients will then be treated with the maximum tolerated combined dose.

Also known as: cMET inhibitor
Arm 1

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • advanced non small cell lung cancer (dose escalation phase)
  • acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib (expansion phase)
  • mandatory entrance biopsy (expansion phase)

You may not qualify if:

  • interstitial lung disease
  • unstable brain metastases
  • leptomeningeal disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

Clinical Trials Office University of Colorado Hospital (CTO)

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

Location

DRUG SHIPMENT: University of Colorado Cancer Center

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

Location

Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

Location

University of Colorado Hospital

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

Location

CCR, National Cancer Institute

Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States

Location

Drug Shipment Only

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Brigham & Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

Drug Shipment Only

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

Location

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology

East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002, Australia

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Interventions

Crizotinibdacomitinib

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Carcinoma, BronchogenicBronchial NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsRespiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsAminopyridinesPyridines

Results Point of Contact

Title
Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Organization
Pfizer, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Pfizer CT.gov Call Center

    Pfizer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2010

First Posted

May 12, 2010

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion

February 1, 2014

Study Completion

February 1, 2014

Last Updated

October 28, 2015

Results First Posted

March 30, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-10

Locations