A Study Of Combined C- MET Inhibitor And PAN-HER Inhibitor (PF-02341066 And PF-00299804) In Patients With Non- Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1, Open-label, Dose Escalation Study To Evaluate Safety, Pharmacokinetics And Pharmacodynamics Of Combined Oral C-met/Alk Inhibitor (Pf-02341066) And Pan-her Inhibitor (Pf-00299804) In Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
70
2 countries
10
Brief Summary
Lung cancer tumors become resistant to the first generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors erlotinib or gefitinib by changing and increasing the activity of two cell signaling pathways: the cMET pathway and the EGFR pathway. Both resistance mechanisms can occur at the same time, in the same patient and even in the same tumor. This study combines a second generation EGFR inhibitor and a cMET inhibitor to block both these pathways in order to overcome resistance and treat this disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Aug 2010
Typical duration for phase_1
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 12, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 30, 2015
CompletedOctober 28, 2015
October 1, 2015
3.5 years
May 10, 2010
February 11, 2015
October 6, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Overview of Treatment-emergent All Causalities Adverse Events (AEs) in Escalation Phase
AE was any untoward medical occurrence with study drug/ device in a trial participant. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.
Up to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)
Overview of Treatment-emergent All Causalities AEs in Expansion Phase
AE was any untoward medical occurrence with study drug/ device in a trial participant. SAE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using NCI CTCAE v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.
Up to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)
Overview of Treatment-emergent, Treatment-related AEs in Escalation Phase
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study treatment in a participant who received study treatment. SAE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using NCI CTCAE v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.
Up to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)
Overview of Treatment-emergent, Treatment-related AEs in Expansion Phase
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study treatment in a participant who received study treatment. SAE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using NCI CTCAE v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.
Up to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Escalation Phase
DLTs were those AEs which occurred in Cycle 1 of treatment in Dose Escalation Phase which may be attributed to study drug \[combined Crizotinib (PF-02341066) plus Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)\] without a clear alternative explanation and despite the use of adequate/maximal medical intervention as dictated by local institutional clinical practices or the judgment of the investigator. The following events were considered DLTs (using CTCAE version 4.02);1. Grade ≥4 hematologic events. 2. Grade ≥3 non-hematological events (except Grade 3/4 asymptomatic hypophosphatemia and Grade 3/4 hyperuricemia without signs and symptoms of gout). Nausea, vomiting or diarrhea had to have persisted at Grade 3 or 4 despite maximal medical therapy. Grade 3 hypertension will be considered a DLT only if the event is unmanageable by standard approved pharmacologic agents or if the symptomatic sequelae are identified despite appropriate medical intervention.
Cycle 1 (4 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (37)
Number of Participants With Stable Disease and Stable Disease Duration in Escalation Phase
From objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)
Number of Participants With Stable Disease and Stable Disease Duration in Expansion Phase
From objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)
Number of Participants With Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Escalation Phase
From objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)
Number of Participants With ORR in Expansion Phase
From objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)
Duration of Response for the Only Participant Shown Partial Response in Expansion Phase
From objective response to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to post treatment follow-up as 28-35 days after last dose of study treatment)
- +32 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1
EXPERIMENTALPF-02341066 AND PF-00299804: Patients will be treated with combined cMET inhibitor (PF-02341066) and panHER inhibitor (PF-00299804).
Arm 2
EXPERIMENTALPF-00299804 FOLLOWED BY COMBINED PF-02341066 AND PF-00299804: Patients will be treated with single agent panHER inhibitor (PF-00299804) until disease progression and then with the maximum tolerated combined dose of cMET inhibitor (PF-02341066) and panHER inhibitor (PF-00299804).
Interventions
Arm 1: The starting dose will be 30 mg by mouth once a day of PF-0029804 in tablet form. The dose of each drug in the combination \[PF-02341066 and PF-00299804\] will be escalated or de-escalated until the maximum tolerated combined dose is reached. Patients will then be treated with the maximum tolerated combined dose.
Arm 1: The starting dose will be 200 mg by mouth, twice a day of PF 02341066 in tablet form The dose of each drug in the combination \[PF-02341066 and PF-00299804\] will be escalated or de-escalated until the maximum tolerated combined dose is reached. Patients will then be treated with the maximum tolerated combined dose.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- advanced non small cell lung cancer (dose escalation phase)
- acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib (expansion phase)
- mandatory entrance biopsy (expansion phase)
You may not qualify if:
- interstitial lung disease
- unstable brain metastases
- leptomeningeal disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pfizerlead
Study Sites (10)
Clinical Trials Office University of Colorado Hospital (CTO)
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
DRUG SHIPMENT: University of Colorado Cancer Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
CCR, National Cancer Institute
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Drug Shipment Only
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Brigham & Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Drug Shipment Only
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology
East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002, Australia
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2010
First Posted
May 12, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2014
Study Completion
February 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 28, 2015
Results First Posted
March 30, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10