Comparative Effectiveness of Intubating Devices in the Morbidly Obese
A Prospective Study Comparing Video Laryngoscopy Devices to Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
121
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective, randomized study will compare the effectiveness of 4 different airway intubating devices which are most commonly used. The four different devices are as follows: McGrath video laryngoscope, GlideScope video laryngoscope, Video-Mac video laryngoscope, and Macintosh size 4 direct laryngoscope.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 obesity
Started May 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 9, 2016
CompletedApril 6, 2016
March 1, 2016
1.4 years
April 23, 2010
September 3, 2015
March 8, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Intubation Time Using a Stop Watch
Evaluate if the time it takes to achieve successful tracheal intubation in patients undergoing bariatric surgery (weight loss surgery) will be reduced using the video-mac, glidescope, and McGrath vs direct laryngoscopy.
up to 3 minutes
Time to Obtain Glottis Visualization (Seconds)
It is the time (seconds) following initial insertion of laryngoscope blade to obtain a glottic view. Start of intubation procedure to Glottic view (the opening between the vocal cords at the upper part of the larynx) visualization comparison between the four devices in patients undergoing bariatric surgery
up to 1 minute
Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) [%]
POGO score of 100% denotes visualization of the entire glottic opening in linear fashion from the anterior commissure to the posterior cartilages. If none of the glottic opening is seen, then the POGO score is 0%. View of the glottic opening (0-100%) during the intubation process.
up to 1 minute
Glottis View Using the Cormack Lehane Score
Cormack Lehane score classification: Grade 1: Most of the glottis is visible Grade 2: At best almost half of the glottis is seen, at worst only the posterior tip of the arytenoids is seen Grade 3: Only the epiglottis is visible Grade 4: No laryngeal structures are visible
Up to 1 minute
Study Arms (4)
Video-Mac
EXPERIMENTALVideo-Mac device used during intubation procedure
GlideScope
EXPERIMENTALGlideScope device used during intubation procedure
McGrath
EXPERIMENTALMcGrath device used during intubation procedure
Direct Macintosh Laryngoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORDirect Macintosh Laryngoscopy (DL) used during intubation procedure
Interventions
Intubation with Direct Macintosh Laryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a documented body mass index (BMI) of \>35.
- Patients scheduled to undergo inpatient surgery procedures under general anesthesia.
- Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document
- years of age
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class II- III adults of either sex.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are deemed to be such a significant of an airway risk that they necessitate awake fiberoptic intubation
- Patients with a history facial abnormalities, oral-pharyngeal cancer or reconstructive surgery
- Emergency surgeries
- Pregnancy
- The inability to tolerate 0.2mg of glycopyrrolate based on tachycardia.
- Any other conditions or use of any medication which may interfere with the conduct of the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Roya Yumul, M.D., Ph.D.
- Organization
- Department of Anesthesiology at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roya Yumul, MD, PhD
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Residency program director, Department of anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2010
First Posted
May 3, 2010
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
October 1, 2011
Last Updated
April 6, 2016
Results First Posted
March 9, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03