Cross Over Convenience And Preference Study Of New Mark VII Compared To Genotropin Pen In Pediatric And Adult Subjects
CHOOSE
A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Two Arm Cross Over Study Assessing Dyad (Subject and Caregiver) and Adult Subject Perception of Convenience and Preference of the Newly Developed Genotropin Mark VII Pen.
1 other identifier
interventional
120
7 countries
23
Brief Summary
Convenience and preference for the new Mark VII pen compared to the current Genotropin pen will be assessed using a questionaire. it is expected that the new pen will be preferred or at least no different to the current pen.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Aug 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 14, 2012
CompletedMay 22, 2012
May 1, 2012
1.2 years
April 20, 2010
April 16, 2012
May 15, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Dyads (Participant and Caregiver or Parent) and Adult Participants Reporting no Difference or Easier to Use for the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Compared to the Genotropin Pen®
Participants were asked the following question from Section II of the Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) patient-reported outcome (PRO) tool, "Thinking about the Genotropin pen and the new injection pen you used over the past few months, please compare both injection pens and choose which one is easier to use overall?" Choices included: Genotropin Pen® easier to use, new injection pen easier to use, or no difference.
Month 4
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Percentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Reporting no Preference or Preference for the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Compared to the Genotropin Pen®
Month 4
Percentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Reporting the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Easier to Use Compared to the Genotropin Pen®
Month 4
Percentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Reporting the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Preferable Compared to the Genotropin Pen®
Month 4
Percentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Who Would Choose the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen in Preference to the Genotropin® Pen
Month 4
Ease of Use of Each Injection Pen
Month 2 and Month 4
Study Arms (2)
Mark VII/Current pen
OTHERSubject will use Mark VII pen for 2 months followed by Current pen for 2 months
Current pen/Mark VII
OTHERSubject will use current Genotropin pen for 2 months followed by Mark VII pen for 2 months
Interventions
Pen provided in 5, 5.3 and 12 mg doses, Dose based on body weight, subcutaneous injection daily for 2 months while in study.
Pen provided in 5, 5.3 and 12mg doses, dose based on body weight, subcutaneous injection daily for 2 months while in study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age greater than or equal to 8 years.
- Subjects who are starting treatment with growth hormone (Genotropin) for the first time.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with Prader-Willi syndrome or chronic renal insufficiency.
- Subjects and caregivers who, in the opinion of the investigator are not able to adequately participate in the study.
- Subjects with chronic systemic disorders, such as diabetes and heart disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pfizerlead
Study Sites (23)
Fakultni Nemocnice Brno
Brno - Mesto, 61300, Czechia
Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc
Olomouc, 775 20, Czechia
Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze
Prague, 128 08, Czechia
Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
Prague, 150 06, Czechia
Vestische Kinder- und Jugendklinik Datteln
Datteln, 45711, Germany
Universitaetsklinik fuer Kinder und Jugendliche
Erlangen, 91054, Germany
Privatpraxis
Gauting, 82131, Germany
Praxis fuer paediatrische Endokrinologie
Niederrad, 60528, Germany
Privatpraxis
Oldenburg, 26122, Germany
Sophia Kinderziekenhuis
Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Netherlands
Juliana Kinderziekenhuis / Endocrinologie
The Hague, Netherlands
Narodny endokrinologicky a diabetologicky ustav
Ľubochňa, Slovakia, 034 91, Slovakia
Detska fakultna nemonica s poliklinikou, II. Detska klinika
Bratislava, 833 40, Slovakia
Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, Centrum for Endokrinologi och Metabolism (CEM)
Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden
Drottning Silvias barn- och ungdomssjukhus, SU/Ostra
Gothenburg, 416 85, Sweden
Barn och Ungdomsmedicinkliniken
Linköping, 581 85, Sweden
Barnmedicinkliniken N
Umeå, 901 85, Sweden
Ankara University Medical Faculty Department of Internal Diseases
Sihhiye, Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Istanbul University Istanbul Medical Faculty Department of Pediatric Health and Diseases
Çapa, Istanbul, 34390, Turkey (Türkiye)
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Hope Hospital
Salford, Manchester, M6 8HD, United Kingdom
Royal Hospital for Sick Children
Glasgow, G3 8SJ, United Kingdom
St Thomas Hospital
London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
Norwich, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Pleil AM, Darendeliler F, Dorr HG, Hutchinson K, Wollmann HA. Results from an international multicenter trial evaluating the ease-of-use of and preference for a newly developed disposable injection pen for the treatment of growth hormone deficiency in treatment-naive children and adults. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Apr 11;7:61-71. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S59821. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24748824DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2010
First Posted
April 28, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
October 1, 2011
Last Updated
May 22, 2012
Results First Posted
May 14, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-05