Goal Setting and Lifestyle
GSDB
Goal Setting and Decisional Balance Applied to Physical Activity and Fruit & Vegetable Consumption
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this feasibility study is to determine if a theory-based lifestyle intervention consisting of telephone counseling is associated with improvements in physical activity and dietary intake.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2006
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2010
CompletedApril 26, 2010
April 1, 2010
7 months
April 21, 2010
April 22, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Leisure Time Physical Activity
Physical Activity was measured using an adaptation of the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire. Participants reported how many times during an average week they participated in mild (i.e., takes minimal effort), moderate (i.e., increases your heart and breathing rate a little), and strenuous activity (i.e., caused one's heart to beat rapidly) for at least 30 minutes at a time.
8-weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Goal specificity and difficulty
8-weeks
Study Arms (2)
Physical activity
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received individual tailored telephone counseling and group-tailored newsletters encouraging leisure time physical activity. Content was based on goal setting theory and decisional balance.
Fruit and vegetable
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received individual tailored telephone counseling and group-tailored newsletters encouraging fruit and vegetable intake. Content was based on goal setting theory and decisional balance.
Interventions
Participants received two individually tailored phone calls and two condition specific newsletters encouraging goal setting and weighing the pros and cons for physical activity.
Participants received two individually tailored phone calls and two condition specific newsletters encouraging goal setting and weighing the pros and cons for fruit and vegetable consumption.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- must be 55 years or older,
- posses a telephone,
- able to give informed consent, and
- commit to a 10 week study.
You may not qualify if:
- currently enrolled in a study promoting physical activity or dietary intake,
- currently exceeding current recommendations for physical activity or F\&V intake at baseline, and
- medical conditions contraindicating physical activity or fruit and vegetable consumption.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Hawaiilead
- University of Hawaii Cancer Research Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Cancer Research Center of Hawaii / University of Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Raheem J Paxton, PhD
University of Hawaii Cancer Research Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2010
First Posted
April 26, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2006
Primary Completion
March 1, 2007
Study Completion
August 1, 2007
Last Updated
April 26, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-04