NCT01107860

Brief Summary

The primary aim of this study is to continue the investigation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for breast imaging already underway in the diagnostic setting by providing a compelling body of evidence incorporating non-contrast CBCT in the study protocol. The goal is to accumulate a body of evidence to provide data to incorporate CBCT into the diagnostic work-up of breast lesions.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
401

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2010

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2010

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 5, 2010

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 21, 2010

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2012

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

June 18, 2013

Status Verified

June 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

January 5, 2010

Last Update Submit

June 14, 2013

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Concordance and discordance of CBCT imaging with diagnostic mammography, other breast-imaging modalities, and histopathology

    The primary measure of this study will include the following aspects. * the capacity of CBCT to image the breast in its entirety as compared with the gold standard mammographic exam * patient's comfort during the CBCT exam vs the mammographic exam * the concordance and discordance of CBCT breast imaging with standard mammography and other breast-imaging studies * the concordance and discordance of CBCT breast imaging with histopathology * number of participants with adverse events as a measure of safety

    about 3 years

Study Arms (2)

Group I

Device: Computed Tomography

Group II

Device: Computed Tomography

Interventions

In Group I, fifty CBCT studies will be performed. The objectives will be to illustrate the capacity of CBCT to image the breast in its entirety as compared with the gold standard mammographic exam.

Group I

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population will be selected from the patient population at a community based clinic, Elizabeth Wende Breast Care, LLC, which is located in Rochester, NY. Group I will consist of subjects who have had mammograms read as BIRADS® 1 or 2. Group II will be subjects who have had a diagnostic mammogram read as BIRADS® 4 or 5 prior to breast biopsy.

You may qualify if:

  • Group I:
  • Females at least 35 years of age of any ethnicity
  • Had a mammogram, read as BI-RADS® 1 or 2
  • Will undergo study imaging no later than four weeks from date of mammogram.
  • Is able to undergo informed consent.
  • Group II:
  • Females at least 35 years of age of any ethnicity
  • Require diagnostic imaging
  • Will undergo study imaging no later than four weeks from date of diagnostic mammogram
  • Is able to undergo informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Group I and Group II:
  • Pregnancy
  • Lactation
  • Subjects with physical limitations that may prohibit resting prone on the exam table, such as, but not limited to: frozen shoulder, recent heart surgery, pace maker.
  • Subjects who are unable to tolerate study constraints.
  • Subjects who have received radiation treatments to the thorax for malignant and nonmalignant conditions, such as (but not limited to)
  • Treatment for enlarged thymus gland as an infant
  • Irradiation for benign breast conditions, including breast inflammation after giving birth
  • Treatment for Hodgkins disease
  • Subjects who have participated in a prior breast clinical trial that gave additional radiation dose, such as an additional mammogram.
  • Subjects who have received large numbers of diagnostic x-ray examinations for monitoring of disease such as (but not limited to)
  • Tuberculosis
  • Severe scoliosis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Elizabeth Wende Breast Care

Rochester, New York, 14620, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Interventions

Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisRadiographic Image EnhancementImage EnhancementPhotographyRadiographyTomography, X-RayTomography

Study Officials

  • Posy Seifert, D.O.

    Elizabeth Wende Breast Care, LLC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2010

First Posted

April 21, 2010

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion

December 1, 2012

Study Completion

June 1, 2013

Last Updated

June 18, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-06

Locations