Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Cancer Associated Venothromboembolism
FDG PET in Cancer Associated Venothromboembolism
2 other identifiers
observational
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Venothromboembolic disease (VTE), which includes deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a severe health problem, effecting 1.5/1000 per year in the general population. In patients over 60 years of age, the incidence is 1/100 per year. Of the two million Americans per year who will develop VTE, one third will develop pulmonary embolism (PE). VTE is usually diagnosed by Doppler ultrasound or contrast venography when present in the extremities, VQ scan or pulmonary angiography when PE is present. However, there are many instances when the diagnosis of VTE by conventional modalities is limited. These include obesity, recent trauma or surgery, the presence of a mass, the presence of clot around central lines, and clot occurring in the abdomen and pelvis. Furthermore, the differentiation between new and old clot has evaded all diagnostic imaging modalities, and no existing modality allows for an accurate delineation of all sites of thrombus within the body. New approaches to the diagnostic imaging of VTE in complicated cases are needed. The first hypothesis of this project is that FDG PET/CT can be used to accurately diagnose the presence and extent of acute VTE, and that it will distinguish new clot from old. Approximately 20-25% of all new cases of venous thromboembolism occur in known cancer patients. The risk of VTE is 4-6 fold greater in patients with cancer as those without (8-12% vs. 2%, respectively, lifetime risk). In many cases, the development of VTE occurs as the first clinical sign of the cancer, even before it is diagnosed. Among patients presenting with acute VTE have no obvious cause (defined as "idiopathic" or "unprovoked", as opposed to "secondary" VTE), the literature reports that up to 20% (range of reported incidence 7-20%) may ultimately prove to have cancer, depending on the series and whether the thrombosis is unifocal or multifocal. Despite the substantial prevalence of occult cancer in patients presenting with idiopathic VTE, there are no current recommendations that these patients be screened for the presence of cancer. The second hypothesis of the project is that FDG PET/CT can accurately be used to screen for the presence of cancer in patients with unprovoked (idiopathic) acute VTE. Objectives: There are two specific objectives to test the hypotheses associated with this project:
- 1.To establish the sensitivity of FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of acute VTE.
- 2.To perform a pilot project to aid in the design of a larger trial to define the incidence of occult cancer in patients rigorously selected for idiopathic (unprovoked) VTE, and to investigate the value of FDG PET in the early detection of occult cancer in this population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Aug 2006
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2012
CompletedOctober 31, 2014
October 1, 2014
5.4 years
February 2, 2010
October 29, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of FDG PET/CT scanning to diagnose presence, extent, and acuity of Ventothromboembolism diagnosis.
We believe that FDG PET/CT can be used to accurately diagnose the presence, extent, and acuity of VTE. We intend to establish the value of FDG PET, instead, as an alternative modality for the diagnosis of VTE. Clinical situations where this might prove useful include: 1) the presence of old clot, when the distinction between new and old may be important; 2) evaluation of abdominal, pelvic and thoracic thrombus, where Doppler is difficult-to-impossible because of patient obesity; 3) Complicated anatomy due to the presence of tumor or post-therapeutic changes.
April 2012
Interventions
The study is focused on two goals, both of which use a new imaging test called PET/CT. PET/CT combines a special radioactive scan with a CT scan. PET/CT is most commonly used in medical practice to evaluate cancer. Abnormal areas such as cancer "light up" on the PET/CT scan. However, many doctors, including us, have noticed that PET/CT also "lights up" in areas of blood clot formation as well. In this study, PET/CT will be used to evaluate the two goals of this project.
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects will be eligible either with provoked or unprovoked DVT.
You may qualify if:
- Subjects will be eligible either with provoked or unprovoked DVT.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects less than 18 years of age,
- Those who are unable to understand and provide signature informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Utahlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States
Related Publications (1)
Rondina MT, Lam UT, Pendleton RC, Kraiss LW, Wanner N, Zimmerman GA, Hoffman JM, Hanrahan C, Boucher K, Christian PE, Butterfield RI, Morton KA. (18)F-FDG PET in the evaluation of acuity of deep vein thrombosis. Clin Nucl Med. 2012 Dec;37(12):1139-45. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182638934.
PMID: 23154470DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kathryn Morton, MD
University of Utah
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2010
First Posted
April 20, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2006
Primary Completion
January 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2012
Last Updated
October 31, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-10