The Comparison of 32mm and 28mm Head Components in Alumina-alumina Total Hip Arthroplasty
THA
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It has been postulated that use of a larger femoral head could reduce the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty, but only limited clinical data have been presented in third generation alumina bearings. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of femoral head size for total hip arthroplasty using third generation alumina bearings on the joint stability and clinical results. The investigators hypothesized that larger ceramic head group has a similar rate of dislocation and clinical results in smaller ceramic head group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started May 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 5, 2010
CompletedMarch 20, 2014
March 1, 2010
1.5 years
April 1, 2010
March 19, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
rate of dislocation in each head size
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
6 weeks
rate of dislocation in each head size
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
3 months
rate of dislocation in each head size
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
6 months
rate of dislocation in each head size
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
9 months
rate of dislocation in each head size
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
12 months
rate of dislocation in each head size
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
6 weeks
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
3 months
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
6 months
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
9 months
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
12 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
32mm ceramic head group
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients performed with THA using 32mm ceramic head
28mm ceramic head group
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients performed with THA using 28mm ceramic head
Interventions
we performed THA using 32mm ceramic head in this group.
we performed THA using 28mm ceramic head in this group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- osteonecrosis of femoral head
- primary or secondary osteoarthritis of the hips
- femoral neck fracture
You may not qualify if:
- previous hemi- or total hip arthroplasty
- highly dislocated or severe ankylosed hip
- patients who are considered potentially unreliable or who may not reliably attend study visits
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul national University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, South Korea
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kyung-Hoi Koo, professor
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2010
First Posted
April 5, 2010
Study Start
May 1, 2006
Primary Completion
November 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
March 20, 2014
Record last verified: 2010-03