Paracervical Block for Pain Control in First Trimester Abortion
An Evaluation of the Paracervical Block for Pain Control in First Trimester Surgical Abortion
1 other identifier
interventional
121
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many woman undergoing a surgical abortion receive a paracervical nerve block for pain reduction, in which lidocaine (a numbing medication) is injected around the cervix. These injections numb the cervix and possibly the lower part of the uterus. However, the injection can be uncomfortable and it is not well known whether it is effective in reducing pain. The purpose of this study is to determine the level of pain women experience with a surgical abortion and the effect that paracervical block might have on that pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Apr 2010
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2012
CompletedDecember 27, 2019
December 1, 2019
6 months
March 25, 2010
December 24, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain reported with cervical dilation
Distance (mm) from the left of the 100-mm VAS scale (reflecting magnitude of pain) recorded at time of cervical dilation.
1 Year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Anticipated and reported pain at various time points
1 Year
Anxiety reported with the pain expected during the procedure and the procedure itself.
1 Year
Satisfaction reported with pain control and overall procedure
1 Year
Need for additional intraoperative and/or postoperative pain medication
1 Year
Study Arms (2)
No Paracervical Block for Pain Control
SHAM COMPARATORSubject will not receive a paracervical block during the procedure
Paracervical Block for Pain Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubject will receive a paracervical block during the procedure.
Interventions
Subject receives 20 mL paracervical block with 18 mL of 1% Lidocaine solution buffered with 2 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate for pain control.
In the non-intervention group, the surgeon performs a sham PCB during which 2 mL buffered lidocaine solution are injected at the tenaculum site, after which a capped needle gently simulates the standard PCB procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: 18 years or older
- Voluntarily requesting pregnancy termination
- Ultrasound confirmed intrauterine pregnancy up to 10 6/7 weeks gestational age
- Good general health
- English or Spanish speaking
- Be able and willing to sign an informed consent and agree to terms of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Gestational ages over 11 0/7 weeks, due to routine misoprostol use at our institutions
- Incomplete abortion
- Required or requested narcotics or IV sedation (prior to randomization)
- Patients who refuse Ibuprofen and paracervical blocks
- Contraindications or allergies to lidocaine, ibuprofen or ativan
- Significant physical or mental health condition
- Adnexal mass or tenderness on pelvic exam consistent with pelvic inflammatory disease
- Patients with known hepatic disease
- Women, who in the opinion of the investigator are not suitable for the study protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Planned Parenthood Columbia Willamette
Portland, Oregon, 97212, United States
Related Publications (34)
Allen RH, Kumar D, Fitzmaurice G, Lifford KL, Goldberg AB. Pain management of first-trimester surgical abortion: effects of selection of local anesthesia with and without lorazepam or intravenous sedation. Contraception. 2006 Nov;74(5):407-13. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Aug 2.
PMID: 17046383BACKGROUNDBelanger E, Melzack R, Lauzon P. Pain of first-trimester abortion: a study of psychosocial and medical predictors. Pain. 1989 Mar;36(3):339-350. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90094-8.
PMID: 2710563BACKGROUNDBerger GS, Tyler CW, Harrod EK. Maternal deaths associated with paracervical block anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Apr 15;118(8):1142-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(74)90698-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 4817653BACKGROUNDBlanco LJ, Reid PR, King TM. Plasma lidocaine levels following paracervical infiltration for aspiration abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Oct;60(4):506-8.
PMID: 7121936BACKGROUNDCetin A, Cetin M. Effect of deep injections of local anesthetics and basal dilatation of cervix in management of pain during legal abortions. A randomized, controlled study. Contraception. 1997 Aug;56(2):85-7. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00096-6.
PMID: 9315416BACKGROUNDDonati S, Medda E, Proietti S, Rizzo L, Spinelli A, Subrizi D, Grandolfo ME. Reducing pain of first trimester abortion under local anaesthesia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996 Dec 27;70(2):145-9. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(95)02583-9.
PMID: 9119094BACKGROUNDEdelman A, Nichols MD, Leclair C, Astley S, Shy K, Jensen JT. Intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain management in first-trimester abortions. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1267-72. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000127981.53911.0e.
PMID: 15172863BACKGROUNDEdelman A, Nichols MD, Leclair C, Jensen JT. Four percent intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain management in first-trimester abortions. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;107(2 Pt 1):269-75. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000194204.71925.4a.
PMID: 16449111BACKGROUNDGlantz JC, Shomento S. Comparison of paracervical block techniques during first trimester pregnancy termination. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Feb;72(2):171-8. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(00)00292-7.
PMID: 11166751BACKGROUNDGomez PI, Gaitan H, Nova C, Paradas A. Paracervical block in incomplete abortion using manual vacuum aspiration: randomized clinical trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;103(5 Pt 1):943-51. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000123269.86525.c4.
PMID: 15121569BACKGROUNDGrimes DA, Cates W Jr. Deaths from paracervical anesthesia used for first-trimester abortion, 1972-1975. N Engl J Med. 1976 Dec 16;295(25):1397-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197612162952503.
PMID: 980095BACKGROUNDHakim-Elahi E, Tovell HM, Burnhill MS. Complications of first-trimester abortion: a report of 170,000 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1):129-35.
PMID: 2359559BACKGROUNDJensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):407-14. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8.
PMID: 14622683BACKGROUNDKan AS, Caves N, Wong SY, Ng EH, Ho PC. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial on the use of a 50:50 mixture of nitrous oxide/oxygen in pain relief during suction evacuation for the first trimester pregnancy termination. Hum Reprod. 2006 Oct;21(10):2606-11. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del234. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
PMID: 16790607BACKGROUNDKan AS, Ng EH, Ho PC. The role and comparison of two techniques of paracervical block for pain relief during suction evacuation for first-trimester pregnancy termination. Contraception. 2004 Aug;70(2):159-63. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.03.013.
PMID: 15288222BACKGROUNDLopez JC, Vigil-De Gracia P, Vega-Malek JC, Ruiz E, Vergara V. A randomized comparison of different methods of analgesia in abortion using manual vacuum aspiration. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Nov;99(2):91-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.023. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
PMID: 17628562BACKGROUNDMiller L, Jensen MP, Stenchever MA. A double-blind randomized comparison of lidocaine and saline for cervical anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Apr;87(4):600-4. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00463-7.
PMID: 8602315BACKGROUNDNichols, M. D., Halvorson-Boyd, G., Goldstein, R., Gevirtz, C., & Healow, D. (2009). Pain management. In M. Paul, E. S. Lichtenberg, L. Borgatta, D. A. Grimes & P. G. Stubblefield (Eds.), Management of unintended and abnormal pregnancy. (pp. 90-110): Wiley-Blackwell.
BACKGROUNDO'Connell K, Jones HE, Simon M, Saporta V, Paul M, Lichtenberg ES; National Abortion Federation Members. First-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members. Contraception. 2009 May;79(5):385-92. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.11.005. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
PMID: 19341852BACKGROUNDOwolabi OT, Moodley J. A randomized trial of pain relief in termination of pregnancy in South Africa. Trop Doct. 2005 Jul;35(3):136-9. doi: 10.1258/0049475054620923.
PMID: 16105333BACKGROUNDPhair N, Jensen JT, Nichols MD. Paracervical block and elective abortion: the effect on pain of waiting between injection and procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1304-7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123734.
PMID: 12066113BACKGROUNDRabin JM, Spitzer M, Dwyer AT, Kaiser IH. Topical anesthesia for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jun;73(6):1040-4. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198906000-00027.
PMID: 2657523BACKGROUNDRenner RM, Jensen JT, Nichols MD, Edelman A. Pain control in first trimester surgical abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD006712. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006712.pub2.
PMID: 19370649BACKGROUNDRowbotham MC. What is a "clinically meaningful" reduction in pain? Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):131-132. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00371-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 11690725BACKGROUNDSmith GM, Stubblefield PG, Chirchirillo L, McCarthy MJ. Pain of first-trimester abortion: its quantification and relations with other variables. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Mar 1;133(5):489-98. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90282-5.
PMID: 443287BACKGROUNDStrauss LT, Gamble SB, Parker WY, Cook DA, Zane SB, Hamdan S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Abortion surveillance--United States, 2004. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007 Nov 23;56(9):1-33.
PMID: 18030283BACKGROUNDSuprapto K, Reed S. Naproxen sodium for pain relief in first-trimester abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Dec 15;150(8):1000-1. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90399-5.
PMID: 6507524BACKGROUNDTodd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):485-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70238-x.
PMID: 8604867BACKGROUNDSafe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. 2nd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK138196/
PMID: 23700650BACKGROUNDWiebe E, Podhradsky L, Dijak V. The effect of lorazepam on pain and anxiety in abortion. Contraception. 2003 Mar;67(3):219-21. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00516-4.
PMID: 12618257BACKGROUNDWiebe ER. Comparison of the efficacy of different local anesthetics and techniques of local anesthesia in therapeutic abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul;167(1):131-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91645-7.
PMID: 1442914BACKGROUNDWiebe ER, Rawling M. Pain control in abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 Jul;50(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(95)02416-a.
PMID: 7556858BACKGROUNDZullo F, Pellicano M, Stigliano CM, Di Carlo C, Fabrizio A, Nappi C. Topical anesthesia for office hysteroscopy. A prospective, randomized study comparing two modalities. J Reprod Med. 1999 Oct;44(10):865-9.
PMID: 10554747BACKGROUNDRenner RM, Nichols MD, Jensen JT, Li H, Edelman AB. Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;119(5):1030-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318250b13e.
PMID: 22525915DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Regina M Renner, MD
Oregon Health and Science University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2010
First Posted
March 26, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2010
Study Completion
November 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 27, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-12