NCT01092442

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to collect long-term follow-up data of the CryoValve SG Pulmonary Human Heart Valve.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2010

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

8 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2010

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 23, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 25, 2010

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 9, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

October 6, 2016

Status Verified

August 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4.9 years

First QC Date

March 23, 2010

Results QC Date

November 2, 2015

Last Update Submit

August 26, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Pulmonary ValveRight Ventricular Outflow Tract ReconstructionRoss Procedure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Hemodynamic Performance

    Peak Pulmonary Gradient Mean Pulmonary Gradient

    Most Recent follow-up (average of 3-6 years post implant)

  • Hemodynamic Performance

    Pulmonary Insufficiency Grade

    Most Recent Follow-up (average of 4 to 6 years post implant)

  • Safety Assessment

    Evaluation of the following adverse events * Mortality (all cause and valve-related) * Reoperation/reintervention * Explant * Endocarditis * Structural valve deterioration (defined as \>40 mmHg peak pulmonary gradient or \>30 mmHg mean pulmonary gradient or moderately severe to severe pulmonary insufficiency) * Thrombosis * Thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism) * Non-structural dysfunction * Perivalvular leak * Bleeding * Hemolysis * Calcification

    Since Implant of the Valve to a Maximum of 13.0 years

Study Arms (2)

Retrospective Patients

Retrospective Patients: The patient group who had the CryoValve SG Pulmonary Human Heart Valve implanted prior to the February 2008 clearance of the valve.

Procedure: Echocardiogram

Prospective Patients

Prospective Patients: The patient group that had the CryoValve SG Pulmonary Human Heart Valve implanted after the February 2008 clearance of the valve.

Procedure: Echocardiogram

Interventions

Patients will have a yearly echocardiogram after enrollment in the study.

Prospective PatientsRetrospective Patients

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Consecutive patients who have had a CryoValve SG Pulmonary Human Heart Valve implanted in the pulmonary position for right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction or as part of the Ross procedure at selected institutions.

• Retrospective Patients o Sequential patients implanted with a CryoValve SG Pulmonary Human Heart Halve as a Ross or RVOT reconstruction between February 2000 and March 2004 who were included in the 510(k) data collection will be identified using the following general criteria to aid in selection of patients who are most likely to provide adequate follow-up data: Patient is alive and the implanted valve is still in place (has not been explanted). Patient is still under the care of the implanting institution or the implanting surgeon. Patient was identified as previously providing data for at least one echocardiographic follow-up assessment at a minimum of one year post-implant. * Additionally, prospective enrolling centers will have the option to enroll retrospective patients. At these centers, all consecutive patients identified from valve implant data at CryoLife, implanted with a CryoValve SG Pulmonary Valve as a valved pulmonary valve prior to Clearance in 2008 will be targeted for inclusion in the retrospective patient data collection. • Prospective Patients * Sequential patients implanted with a CryoValve SG Pulmonary Human Heart Halve as a Ross or RVOT reconstruction after FDA 510(k) clearance in February 2008 at selected institutions.

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (8)

Arizona Pediatric Cardiology Consultants

Phoenix, Arizona, 85006, United States

Location

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Oklahoma University Health and Sciences Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73126, United States

Location

Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons and Austin Heart

Austin, Texas, 78756, United States

Location

Methodist Healthcare System of San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States

Location

Children's Hospital of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53201, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Brown JW, Elkins RC, Clarke DR, Tweddell JS, Huddleston CB, Doty JR, Fehrenbacher JW, Takkenberg JJ. Performance of the CryoValve SG human decellularized pulmonary valve in 342 patients relative to the conventional CryoValve at a mean follow-up of four years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Feb;139(2):339-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.04.065.

    PMID: 20106397BACKGROUND
  • Konuma T, Devaney EJ, Bove EL, Gelehrter S, Hirsch JC, Tavakkol Z, Ohye RG. Performance of CryoValve SG decellularized pulmonary allografts compared with standard cryopreserved allografts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Sep;88(3):849-54; discussion 554-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.06.003.

    PMID: 19699910BACKGROUND
  • Hawkins JA, Hillman ND, Lambert LM, Jones J, Di Russo GB, Profaizer T, Fuller TC, Minich LL, Williams RV, Shaddy RE. Immunogenicity of decellularized cryopreserved allografts in pediatric cardiac surgery: comparison with standard cryopreserved allografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Jul;126(1):247-52; discussion 252-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00116-8.

    PMID: 12878962BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Valve StenosisPulmonary Valve InsufficiencyAortic Valve StenosisAortic Valve Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart Valve DiseasesHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVentricular Outflow ObstructionAortic Valve Disease

Results Point of Contact

Title
Scott B. Capps, MS
Organization
CryoLife, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Scott B Capps, MS

    CryoLife, Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2010

First Posted

March 25, 2010

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

October 6, 2016

Results First Posted

December 9, 2015

Record last verified: 2016-08

Locations