Long - Term Respiratory Rehabilitation Programs in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
1 other identifier
interventional
116
1 country
1
Brief Summary
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a long-term maintenance program after respiratory rehabilitation, in contrast to the usual minimal maintenance therapy, improves the cost-effectiveness through: a.- maintaining long term effects in terms of effort capacity, HRQL, and reduced exacerbations b.- reducing the total cost of care to patients, largely through reduction of exacerbations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: multi-center (4 hospitals) prospective randomized controlled study that will include 150 patients with moderate-severe COPD (age \<75; BODE 4-10) with a 3 years follow-up. All patients will receive an initial in-hospital rehabilitation program which includes: Education, Physiotherapy, lower and upper extremities training and respiratory muscles training. Following completion of this program, patients will undergo concealed randomization to one of two maintenance strategies:1.-an intensive maintenance program (GR1) 2.- a standard, minimal monitoring program (GR2). On the intensive maintenance program (GR1) the physiotherapist will call once a week as a reminder and the patient will attend the hospital once a week . A physiotherapist will supervise the weekly in-hospital exercise and he/she will check if the patient is properly undergoing the rehabilitation treatment. OUTCOMES: 1.- Clinical: dyspnea (area of CRQ questionnaire), HRQL (CRQ, SF 36); Effort capacity (6minute Walking Test), BODE index; 2.- Economical: direct costs (programs); indirect costs (exacerbations, admissions); comparison of GR1 and GR2 costs; EXPECTED OUTCOMES: reduction of dyspnea, improvement of HRQL, effort capacity and BODE index, and reduction of health expenditures in GR1 compared to GR2.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease
Started Oct 2006
Longer than P75 for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedMarch 22, 2017
March 1, 2017
6.2 years
March 19, 2010
March 21, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
1.- Clinical: dyspnea (area of CRQ questionnaire),
1.5 YEARS
Effort capacity (6minute Walking Test),
1.5 Years
BODE index;
1.5 Years
Economical: direct costs (programs);
1.5 Years
indirect costs (exacerbations, admissions);
1.5 Years
comparison of GR1 and GR2 costs;
1.5 Years
Study Arms (2)
1
NO INTERVENTIONAll patients will receive an initial in-hospital rehabilitation program which includes: Education, Physiotherapy, lower and upper extremities training and respiratory muscles training. Following completion of this program, patients will undergo concealed randomization to one of two maintenance strategies. The No Intervention group will undergo a standard, minimal monitoring program.
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients will receive an initial in-hospital rehabilitation program which includes: Education, Physiotherapy, lower and upper extremities training and respiratory muscles training. Following completion of this program, patients will undergo concealed randomization to one of two maintenance strategies. The active comparator group will undergo an intensive maintenance program after the initial in-hospital rehabilitation program.
Interventions
To determine whether a long-term maintenance program after respiratory rehabilitation (group active comparator), in contrast to the usual minimal maintenance therapy (group no intervention), improves the cost-effectiveness through: a.- maintaining long term effects in terms of effort capacity, HRQL, and reduced exacerbations b.- reducing the total cost of care to patients, largely through reduction of exacerbations.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- COPD Patients
- Less than 77 years
- BODE index of 3-10 (BODE 3 when FEV1\<50% v. Ref.).
- clinically stable (at least one month)
- Informed consent signed
You may not qualify if:
- Bone or muscle disease that limits the exercise training.
- Heart disease that disable physic exercise.
- Bronchiectasis or other Respiratory diseases different than COPD.
- Comorbidity that difficult o disable respiratory rehabilitation program carrying out.
- Life expectation less than 2 years.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08025, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Guell MR, Cejudo P, Ortega F, Puy MC, Rodriguez-Trigo G, Pijoan JI, Martinez-Indart L, Gorostiza A, Bdeir K, Celli B, Galdiz JB. Benefits of Long-Term Pulmonary Rehabilitation Maintenance Program in Patients with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Three-Year Follow-up. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar 1;195(5):622-629. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201603-0602OC.
PMID: 27611807DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2010
First Posted
March 23, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 22, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03