Portable Health Files Improve Quality of Care and Health Outcomes: a Randomized Controlled Trial
PHF-RCT
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Portable Electronic(USB)and Paper Medical Records as an Adjunct to Usual Care (Portable Health File RCT): an Evaluation of Short Term Quality Measures and Long-term Clinical Outcomes
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
March 2020
Estimated (date passed)
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Brief Summary
The PHF trial will assess the acceptability and long term outcomes resulting from the usage of electronic (carried by the patient on a USB memory device) and paper portable health files in a population with high intensity use of medical services. The rationale is that use of the portable health files provides a conduit of direct communication among health care providers of a patient's important health care information and this leads to better care and patient outcomes.
Primary hypothesis: Addition of a patient-held portable health file (PHF) to usual care improves patient outcome and quality-of-life compared to usual care alone.
Secondary hypothesis: Addition of patient-held portable health file (PHF) to usual care is acceptable and satisfactory to patients and their health care providers.
Registry Overview
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
Recruitment status
unknown
Estimated enrollment
382 participants
Study completion date
March 2020
Estimated (date passed)
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Listed locations
1 countries · 1 sites
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Related Scientific Literature
Loading related publications...
Study Timeline
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
Study Start
March 2010
Actual (reported)
First Submitted
March 8, 2010
Actual (reported)
First Posted
March 9, 2010
Actual (reported)
Primary Completion
March 2019
Estimated (date passed)
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
March 2020
Estimated (date passed)
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Quality of LifeHealth Care Quality and SafetyRandomized controlled trial
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Combined endpoint of deaths, hospitalisations (excepting day only hospitalisations), and serious out-of-hospital events
The primary outcome is the total number of important clinical events (all hospitalisations except same-day hospitalisations, all serious out-of-hospital events and deaths).
See above: The assigned treatment (i.e., the e-PHF or p-PHF) will be used for 4 years total. Patients will also be followed for an additional 3 years beyond the conclusion of the randomised trial to see if there are any longer-term lag effects.
48 months + 36 month extension
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Quality of Life
every 12 months for 48 months
health service utilisation and health care costs
every 12 months for 48 months
medication errors, duplicative investigations
every 12 months for 48 months
clinical workflow
every 6 months for 2 years then every 12 months until 48 months
subject and health care provider acceptability and satisfaction with portable health files (PHF)
every 3 months for 12 months then every 6 months 24 months then every 12 months until 48 months
+4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Electronic (USB) Portable Health File
EXPERIMENTAL
Patients randomized to this arm of the trial will be given a USB memory device that contains the Portable Health File (PHF) software. The portable health files contained core medical data which functions as a subset of a comprehensive medical record. The portable health file is updated by the health care provider at each visit and could also be updated by patient between visits if necessary.
Device: Electronic (USB) Portable Health File
Paper Portable Health File
EXPERIMENTAL
Patients randomized to this arm of the trial will be given the paper Portable Health File. The paper Portable Health File contains core medical and other important data which functions as a subset of a more comprehensive medical record. This paper-based portable health file is updated by health care providers at each visit. The PHF can also be updated by patient between visits.
Device: Paper Portable Health File
Interventions
Electronic (USB) Portable Health FileDevice
Patients randomized to this arm of the trial will be given a USB memory device that contains the Portable Health File (PHF) software. The portable health files contained core medical data which functions as a subset of a comprehensive medical record. The portable health file is updated by the health care provider at each visit and could also be updated by patient between visits if necessary.
Also known as: Electronic Personal Health Record, Electronic Patient-Health Provider Shared Medical Record, Electronic Patient-Health Provider Shared Journal, Electronic Patient-carried Shared Medical Record, Electronic Patient-carried Continuity of Care Record
Electronic (USB) Portable Health File
Paper Portable Health FileDevice
Eligibility Criteria
Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
You may qualify if:
Subjects must be of age 60 or greater
Patients living independently in the community. Hostel care is acceptable, but patients that are not independent requiring full nursing home care are excluded.
Lassere MN, Baker S, Parle A, Sara A, Johnson KR. Improving quality of care and long-term health outcomes through continuity of care with the use of an electronic or paper patient-held portable health file (COMMUNICATE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Jun 4;16:253. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0760-8.
Primary outcomes, death and overnight hospitalisations, are obtained through record linkage and are masked outcomes. Outcome assessor, however, is not masked to patient-reported outcomes. Chief Investigator and statistical analyses are masked to randomisation/intervention group.
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Staff Specialist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2010
First Posted
March 9, 2010
Study Start
March 2010
Actual (reported)
NCT07206550
The Role of Framing and Choice Architecture in Patients' Reactions and EHR Error Discovery and Reporting
Patients randomized to this arm of the trial will not be given a Portable Health File. This arm is the concurrent control comparator arm.
Patients randomized to this arm of the trial will be given the paper Portable Health File. The paper Portable Health File contains core medical and other important data which functions as a subset of a more comprehensive medical record. This paper-based portable health file is updated by health care providers at each visit. The PHF can also be updated by patient between visits.
Also known as: Paper Personal Health Record, Paper Patient-Health Provider Shared Medical Record, Paper Patient-Health Provider Shared Journal, Paper Patient-carried Shared Medical Record, Paper Patient-carried Continuity of Care Record
Paper Portable Health File
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Subjects must have had six medical practitioner visits in the previous 12 months
Subjects must have at least two of the following confirmed chronic diseases that require prescription oral or parenteral drug treatment or surgery and requiring at least annual specialist consultation: cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine, renal, neurologic, gastrointestinal, hepatic, genitourinary, haematologic. infective, rheumatic, inflammatory, immunologic or neoplastic disease.
\. Subject's GP must have access to a computer during the consultation visit. 7. Subjects must have at least two medical specialists at least one of whom has access to a computer during the consultation visit.
\. Subjects must be able to understand the purpose of the trial and undergo full and valid informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
Life expectancy of less than 12 months.
Inability to carry a paper PHF or e-PHF and having no care-giver willing and able to accomplish same.
Mentally unable to undertake valid informed consent.
Patients who are not independent in the community, that cannot mobilise to see a specialist or requiring full nursing home care
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
March 2020
Estimated (date passed)
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Last Updated
August 1, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07
Source record
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.