An Efficacy and Safety Study to Compare Morphine 6-glucuronide (M6G) and Morphine in Patients Suffering With Post-Operative Pain for at Least 24 Hours
A Randomised Double-blind Study to Compare the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety Profiles of M6G and Morphine, as a Loading Dose Followed by PCA, in Patients Suffering Moderate to Severe Post-operative Pain Requiring PCA for at Least 24 Hours
2 other identifiers
interventional
517
6 countries
7
Brief Summary
To compare the incidence and severity of nausea in the study treatment groups, during the 18-hour period starting 6 hours after titration to pain relief; following confirmation of the assumption of non-inferiority between the two groups of pain relief over the 24 hour post-operative period. Pain relief and nausea will be determined by measuring the areas under the curves of pain intensity and nausea verbal rating scale scores.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 postoperative-pain
Started Nov 2005
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2010
CompletedAugust 29, 2023
August 1, 2023
1 year
March 5, 2010
August 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence and severity of nausea
To compare the incidence and severity of nausea in the study treatment groups, during the 18-hour period starting 6 hours after titration to pain relief; following confirmation of the assumption of non-inferiority between the two groups of pain relief over the 24-hour post-operative period. Pain relief and nausea were determined by measuring the areas under the curves of pain intensity and nausea verbal rating scale scores.
The 6-18 hour period after titration to pain relief
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Analgesic effect
0-48 hours after titration to pain relief
The incidence and severity of nausea
0-48 hours
The incidence and severity of vomiting
0-48 hours
The amounts of study drug required to achieve a baseline pain severity score of ≤ 3
60-30mins before close of surgery to time 0.
Study Arms (2)
M6G
EXPERIMENTALAn initial slow bolus injection up to 60 min prior to end of surgery. If required, two additional slow bolus injections to achieve baseline pain relief. Continuing on PCA for a minimum of 24 hours.
Morphine
ACTIVE COMPARATORAn initial slow bolus injection up to 60 min prior to end of surgery. If required, two additional slow bolus injections to achieve baseline pain relief. Continuing on PCA for a minimum of 24 hours.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patients undergoing any of the following elective surgical procedures that, in the Investigator's opinion, would have required the use of post-operative patient controlled analgesia for a minimum of 24 hours:
- Abdominal hysterectomy with the exception of laparoscopic procedures.
- Bowel / gastrointestinal (GI) surgery
- Major urological surgery
- Aged ≥ 18 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I to III
- If female, the patient had to be post-menopausal (last menstruation \> 1 year previously), or surgically sterile (e.g. full hysterectomy or tubal ligation). If neither of these was the case, she had to use adequate contraception (i.e. hormonal contraceptive, intrauterine device (IUD), or a double barrier method) and to have a negative urine pregnancy test during the 24-hours prior to surgery.
- Provide written informed consent to participate in the trial prior to surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient was pregnant or lactating.
- Had a known sensitivity to morphine or other opiates, or a medical condition such that opiates were contraindicated.
- Had a known sensitivity to paracetamol, or a medical condition such that paracetamol was contraindicated.
- Had received any investigational drug within the 90 days prior to the start of the study, or was scheduled to receive one during the study period.
- Had been involved in any previous M6G study.
- Had a documented history or current evidence of alcohol or drug abuse within the year prior to screening.
- Had clinically significant findings on pre-treatment evaluations (e.g. laboratory results, electrocardiograms, medical history, physical examination) that, in the Investigator's opinion, should have excluded them from the study.
- Had a concurrent disorder that resulted in excessive pain that, in the Investigator's opinion, would have interfered with the pain assessments during the study (e.g.severe rheumatoid arthritis, muscle dystrophy or neuropathic pain).
- Had a blood clotting disorder or other blood dyscrasias.
- Had requested the use of epidural or intrathecal anaesthesia techniques.
- Required the use of a local anaesthetic block and/or infiltration of wound sites.
- Required the concomitant use of opioids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs) during the study due to an existing concurrent condition.
- Had a history of Left Ventricular Failure or compromised cardiovascular function, defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) level 3.
- Had a history of severe renal impairment or a creatinine level \> 3 times the upper limit of normal.
- Was having surgery that would have prevented the use of oral or rectal paracetamol(iv administration of paracetamol was not allowed).
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Paion UK Ltd.lead
- Chiltern International Ltd.collaborator
- HFL Ltd.collaborator
Study Sites (7)
Teaching Hospital Bulovka, Department of Urology
Prague, 180 00, Czechia
Anaesthetisia - Resuscitation Department, Tenon Hospital
Paris, Cedex 20, 75970, France
Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Klinik und Poliklinik f. Anaesthesiologie
Bonn, 53105, Germany
Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre
Leiden, 2300 RC, Netherlands
Ii Klinika Anestezjologii i It
Lublin, 20-081, Poland
Intensive Care Unit, Level 5, Western Infirmary,
Glasgow, Renfrewshire, G11 6NT, United Kingdom
St John's Hospital
Livingston, West Lothian, EH54 6PP, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexander Binning, M.D.
Intensive Care Unit, Level 5, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, G11 6NT
- STUDY DIRECTOR
James Lees, B.Sc.
Paion UK Ltd.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2010
First Posted
March 8, 2010
Study Start
November 1, 2005
Primary Completion
November 1, 2006
Study Completion
December 1, 2006
Last Updated
August 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08