Efficacy of Two Antiemetic Regimens in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy and Concomitant Weekly Cisplatin
GAND-emesis
A Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Palonosetron and Dexamethasone Plus Fosaprepitant or Placebo in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy and Weekly Cisplatin.
2 other identifiers
interventional
246
4 countries
8
Brief Summary
GAND-emesis is a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of a neurokinin1 receptor antagonist (fosaprepitant dimeglumine) in combination with an antiemetic (anti-nausea-and-vomiting) control regimen (palonosetron and dexamethasone) in patients with a gynaecological cancer diagnosis, who are scheduled to receive radiotherapy and weekly chemotherapy. The study aims at investigating if a three-drug antiemetic regimen is superior to a two-drug regimen (standard treatment) in preventing nausea and vomiting in patients receiving radiotherapy and weekly chemotherapy. A pilot study demonstrated that approximately 50% of patients will experience nausea and vomiting when offered a two-drug antiemetic regimen, and it is expected that addition of a third drug (a neurokinin1 receptor antagonist) can increase the proportion of patients with no vomiting in the course of combined chemo-radiotherapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Apr 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_3
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedApril 24, 2015
April 1, 2015
5 years
February 23, 2010
April 23, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare fosaprepitant dimeglumine, palonosetron, and dexamethasone with palonosetron, dexamethasone, and placebo with respect to efficacy; the proportion of subjects with no vomiting during five weeks of radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin.
35 days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen in terms of the proportion of subjects with complete response in the 7 days following initiation of radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin.
7 days
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen in terms of the proportion of subjects with no significant nausea during five weeks of fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin at a dose of ≥ 40 mg/m2.
35 days
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen with respect to complete response in the 35 days following initiation of fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin at a dose of ≥ 40 mg/m2.
35 days
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen in terms of the proportion of subjects with no nausea during five weeks (35 days) of fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin at a dose of ≥ 40 mg/m2.
35 days
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen in terms of the number of days to first emetic episode.
0-35 days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Fosaprepitant dimeglumine
ACTIVE COMPARATORSaline water
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Addition of fosaprepitant dimeglumine 150 mg IV single dose weekly (before chemotherapy) to dexamethasone and palonosetron.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient has a diagnosis cervical cancer.
- The patient understands the nature and purpose of this study and the study procedures and has signed informed consent.
- The patient is aged \> 18 years.
- The patient must be both chemo- and radiotherapy (RT) naïve. NB: previously low voltage RT or electron RT for non-melanoma skin cancers is allowed.
- The patient is scheduled to receive fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin at a dose of ≥ 40 mg/m2 for at least five weeks.
- Brachy therapy is scheduled to be initiated after the third cycle of weekly cisplatin, and preferentially after the fifth week of treatment.
- Chemotherapy with an emetic risk potential of minimal or mild (up to 30%) is allowed on days 1-4 (see ref. 14).
- The patient has a WHO Performance Status of ≤ 2.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient has a current malignant diagnosis other than cervical cancer, with exception of non-melanoma skin cancers.
- The patient is aged \< 18 years.
- The patient is scheduled to receive less than five weeks of fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin.
- Brachy therapy is planned to be initiated before the third cycle of weekly cisplatin.
- The patient has been previously treated with radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy, with exception of treatment with low voltage RT or electron RT for non-melanoma skin cancers .
- The patient has a WHO Performance Status of \> 2.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Odense University Hospitallead
- Helsinn Healthcare SAcollaborator
Study Sites (8)
RAH Cancer Centre, Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide SA, 5000, Australia
Department of Oncology
Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
Rigshospitalet, Finsen Centret
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Herlev Hospital
Herlev, 2730, Denmark
Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital
Odense, 5000, Denmark
Vivantes Klinikum Neukolln
Berlin, Germany
Universitatsklinikum Schleswig Holstein
Kiel, 24105, Germany
The Norwegian Radium Hospital
Oslo, 0310, Norway
Related Publications (1)
Ruhlmann CH, Christensen TB, Dohn LH, Paludan M, Ronnengart E, Halekoh U, Hilpert F, Feyer P, Kristensen G, Hansen O, Keefe D, Herrstedt J. Efficacy and safety of fosaprepitant for the prevention of nausea and emesis during 5 weeks of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer (the GAND-emesis study): a multinational, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):509-518. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00615-4. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
PMID: 26952945DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jorn Herrstedt, MD, DMSci
Odense University Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christina Ruhlmann, MD
Odense University Hospial
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dorothy Keefe, MD, FRACP
Royal Adelaide Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Petra Feyer, MD, DMSci
Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln in Berlin
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Broe Christensen, MD, PhD
Herlev Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gunnar Kristensen, MD, PhD
Norwegian Radium Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Henrik Roed, MD, DMSci
The Finsen Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Felix Hilpert, MD, DMSci
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jacob C Lindegaard, MD
Department of Oncology,Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2010
First Posted
February 24, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 24, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04