Does Routine Pressure Wire Assessment Influence Management Strategy at Coronary Angiography for Diagnosis of Chest Pain?
RIPCORD
2 other identifiers
interventional
203
2 countries
10
Brief Summary
The use of coronary angiography to investigate patients at risk of coronary artery narrowings has become universal. In most cases, this investigation leads to a successful treatment plan with revascularisation recommended where appropriate. However in a substantial number of patients, the images taken of the coronary arteries can lead to diagnostic uncertainty. Increasingly, doctors are using devices called pressure wires to clarify the significance of coronary artery narrowings in order to tailor patient treatment on an individual basis. The Radi pressure wire is well recognised as a reliable tool in assessing whether a narrowing is significant in functional terms, that is, does it significantly restrict blood flow to the heart muscle.It consists of a fine wire that is fed into individual major coronary arteries to measure pressure within the vessel itself. In conjunction with the images taken of the arteries, it is very useful in deciding how best to treat patients. This study enrolls volunteers who are being investigated for stable cardiac-sounding chest pain and are undergoing a coronary angiogram. It will investigate whether the extra information gained from pressure wire assessment will change patients' treatment plan.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Jun 2008
Typical duration for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 18, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 11, 2015
CompletedMay 22, 2019
October 1, 2015
4.2 years
February 17, 2010
May 29, 2015
May 8, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Estimation of Number of Cases Where FFR Data Results in a Change in the Management Strategy (Number of Vessel Requiring Treatment and/or PCI vs Medical vs CABG)
This outcome measure was assessing agreement in the management plan (MP) derived from angiographic assessment alone compared to a MP derived from angiographic assessment plus the use of FFR data acquired at the time of angiography. The study assessed the proportion of cases in which the angiogram directed MP changed after FFR data were disclosed.
Up until hospital discharge. Most cases were day cases but no specific data relating to length of stay collected.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To Determine the Level of Agreement in Management Plans Regarding the Significance of Coronary Artery Narrowings When Comparing the MP Acquired by Standard Angiographic Assessment Alone and a MP Acquired Using Angiographic Assessment Plus FFR Data.
Up to hospital discharge. Most were day case procedures but no specific data relating to discharge was collected.
Interventions
Intracoronary insertion of pressure wire at the time of diagnostic angiography.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients referred for elective coronary angiography under a non-interventional cardiologist for the investigation of chest pain thought to be of cardiac origin.
- There is no requirement for a test demonstrating objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia because this study aims to recruit consecutive patients in real world current practice
- Written informed consent
- No participation in other studies
You may not qualify if:
- Previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery
- Acute coronary syndrome at presentation
- Diagnostic angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention within the previous 12 months
- Contraindication to adenosine
- Severe valve disease
- Creatinine \>180
- Life threatening comorbidity
- Diagnostic angiogram showing "normal" coronary arteries defined as no coronary stenosis of \>30% by visual estimate in any epicardial vessel of \>2.25mm diameter
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Dr Colm Hanratty
Belfast, BT9 7AB, Ireland
Dr Alex Hobson
Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO6 3LY, United Kingdom
Dr Dan McKenzie
Taunton, Somerset, TA1 5DA, United Kingdom
Royal Sussex County Hospital
Brighton, BN2 5BE, United Kingdom
Dr Kamal Chitkara
Derby, DE22 3NE, United Kingdom
West of Scotland Regional Heart & Lung Centre
Glasgow, G81 4HX, United Kingdom
Dr Steve Wheatcroft
Leeds, LS1 3EX, United Kingdom
Freeman Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Curzen N, Rana O, Nicholas Z, Golledge P, Zaman A, Oldroyd K, Hanratty C, Banning A, Wheatcroft S, Hobson A, Chitkara K, Hildick-Smith D, McKenzie D, Calver A, Dimitrov BD, Corbett S. Does routine pressure wire assessment influence management strategy at coronary angiography for diagnosis of chest pain?: the RIPCORD study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr;7(2):248-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000978. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
PMID: 24642999RESULTBashar HAB, Saunders A, Alaour B, Gerontitis D, Hinton J, Karamanou D, Kechagioglou G, Olsen S, Onwordi E, Pope M, Zingale A, Nicholas Z, Golledge P, Escaned J, Ali Z, Curzen N. Systematic coronary physiology improves level of agreement in diagnostic coronary angiography. Open Heart. 2023 May;10(1):e002258. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002258.
PMID: 37130658DERIVEDStables RH, Mullen LJ, Elguindy M, Nicholas Z, Aboul-Enien YH, Kemp I, O'Kane P, Hobson A, Johnson TW, Khan SQ, Wheatcroft SB, Garg S, Zaman AG, Mamas MA, Nolan J, Jadhav S, Berry C, Watkins S, Hildick-Smith D, Gunn J, Conway D, Hoye A, Fazal IA, Hanratty CG, De Bruyne B, Curzen N. Routine Pressure Wire Assessment Versus Conventional Angiography in the Management of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: The RIPCORD 2 Trial. Circulation. 2022 Aug 30;146(9):687-698. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057793. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
PMID: 35946404DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Professor Nick Curzen
- Organization
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nick Curzen, BM(Hons) PhD FRCP
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2010
First Posted
February 18, 2010
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 22, 2019
Results First Posted
November 11, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10