NCT01067768|CompletedResults
Loading search results
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
1,209
1 country
1
Study Start
November 2009
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
September 2010
Actual (reported)Study Completion
September 2010
Actual (reported)The purpose of this study is to determine whether the daily nurse review of the indication of the urinary catheter compared to the everyday care of the working staff is effective to reduce the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults hospitalized.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
September 2010
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
November 2009
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
February 10, 2010
Actual (reported)February 12, 2010
Actual (reported)September 2010
Actual (reported)September 2010
Actual (reported)August 4, 2011
Actual (reported)Rate of Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection
Until 7 days after the withdrawal of the catheter or at discharge (whichever comes first)
Catheter Days
withdrawal of the catheter
In the intervention group a nurse reviewed daily, by using a checklist designed for this study, the indications and pertinence of the catheter. If it was not indicated she asked the doctor to order the removal of the catheter, but the doctor would make the final decision.
In the control group, the attending team would remove the catheter as routine, without any suggestion by the research protocol.
Daily nursing review of the urinary catheter´s indication. If the patient meets at least one of the entries to stay with bladder catheter, the nurse will record collection in the format but will not contact the health team. If there aren´t indication in the medical record, she contacts at the attending physician and said: "Doctor, I didn´t find record in the history of the indication of the urinary catheter, can we withdraw?. If the physician reported the indication, will be recorded in the format without additional comments. The attending physician decides withdraw or no withdraw the urinary catheter
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
María V Restrepo, Dr.
Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe
1,209 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
February 10, 2010
First Posted
February 12, 2010
Study Start
November 2009
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
A Trial of Different Methods for Bladder Drainage in Hip Surgery Patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
September 2010
Actual (reported)Study Completion
September 2010
Actual (reported)Last Updated
March 5, 2019
Results First Posted
August 4, 2011
Record last verified: 2019-02
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: