A Trial of Iron Replacement in Patients With Iron Deficiency.
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Sucrose and Oral Iron Sulfate in Patients With Iron Deficiency.
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Primary Hypothesis: There is no difference in the efficacy of iron replacement by oral or intravenous route in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients. Iron deficiency anaemia is a common problem in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and patients with excessive blood loss from the bowel or heavy menstrual loss. Treatment options include a blood transfusion, oral iron with (Ferrograd ®) or intravenous iron replacement with iron sucrose (Venofer®). Iron deficiency anaemia is associated with poor quality of life, poor concentration span and low energy level. Blood transfusion may improve symptomatic anaemia quickly but there is a risk of transfusion reaction and blood born infection transmission. Moreover, packed cells are scarce resource therefore its use needs to be carefully prioritized. Oral iron supplement has been widely used and it can be purchased over the counter, however, its efficacy is not known in IBD population. Oral iron is poorly tolerated with side effects include altered bowel habit, nausea and darken stools, making it difficult to adhere to. In contrast, intravenous iron therapy with Venofer® has been shown to replenish iron store and improve anaemia quickly. To date, the safety of Venofer® use has been supported by its post marketing surveillance. Limitations with intravenous iron replacement include the need for medical supervision in the setting of limited healthcare resources; the need for patients to take multiple days off work and the cost of Venofer®. Currently it is uncertain which method of iron replacement is better. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and the cost of oral and intravenous iron replacement in the setting of iron deficiency anaemia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Mar 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedApril 29, 2015
April 1, 2015
3.8 years
November 12, 2009
April 28, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement of iron saturation at week 8.
month 0,2,3.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
To describe the change in the faecal bacteria composition pre and post iron replacement.
Three measurments - at month 0,3.
To describe the changes in ferritin, haemoglobin, Hepcidin,IBDQ, Modified HBI and partial MAYO score in patients before and after iron replacement.
month 0,2,3
To describe the changes in the colonic mucosal endoplasmic reticulum as an indicator of oxidative stress.
month 0 and 3.
To describe the changes in urinary metabolomics from iron replacement.
month 0,3.
Compare the health economics of intravenous versus oral iron replacement.
End of study.
Study Arms (2)
iron sulfate
EXPERIMENTALOral iron sulfate 300mg tid
intravenous iron sulfate
ACTIVE COMPARATORintravenous iron sulfate 300 mg
Interventions
300mg of iron sucrose is given intravenously. Three infusions, each one week apart is given to patients with iron deficiency without anemia. For those patient with anemia, four infusions would be given.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- IBD group:
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease diagnosed by standard clinical, endoscopic and histological criteria
- Iron deficiency: Ferritin \<12 if normal CRP or Ferritin \<100 if elevated CRP AND/OR iron saturation \< 16%
- stable dose of thiopurine or methotrexate for 1 month
- Control group:
- Iron deficiency without IBD/ Coeliac disease/ haematological malignancy
- iron deficiency: Ferritin \<12 if normal CRP or CRP \<100 if elevated CRP AND/OR iron saturation \< 16%
You may not qualify if:
- Patients:
- with severe IBD who is likely to need hospitalization within 4 weeks of enrollment
- with untreated concurrent Vitamin B12 or folate deficiency at baseline
- with Coeliac disease
- pregnant and/or breast feeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Richard Fedoraklead
Study Sites (1)
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2X8, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Lee T, Clavel T, Smirnov K, Schmidt A, Lagkouvardos I, Walker A, Lucio M, Michalke B, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Fedorak R, Haller D. Oral versus intravenous iron replacement therapy distinctly alters the gut microbiota and metabolome in patients with IBD. Gut. 2017 May;66(5):863-871. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309940. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
PMID: 26848182DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard N Fedorak, MD
University of Alberta
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Gastroenterology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2009
First Posted
February 11, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 29, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04