Study Stopped
Interim Analysis and review by Data Safety Monitoring Board
Trial Comparing the Safety of Two Different Intravenous Iron Formulations
A Randomized Double-Blind Safety Comparison of Intravenous Iron Dextran Versus Iron Sucrose in an Adult Non-Hemodialysis Outpatient Population: A Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to compare the safety profile using equal doses of intravenous iron dextran versus iron sucrose. The researchers hypothesize that significantly more patients receiving intravenous iron dextran (using the current intermediate molecular weight product) will have severe adverse outcomes than patients receiving iron sucrose in the adult non-hemodialysis outpatient population. Secondly, since these severe reactions may require additional nursing time and physician interventions that may negate any cost advantage of iron dextran, the researchers hypothesize that iron sucrose will be more cost-effective than iron dextran.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jan 2008
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 15, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedMarch 3, 2009
February 1, 2009
1.9 years
January 3, 2008
March 2, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs)
Immediate - during infusion
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Incidence of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs)
Immediate and delayed - within 24hrs post infusion
Incidence of anaphylactic/anaphylactoid ADRs
Immediate - during infusion
Incidence of combined mild and moderate ADRs
Immediate - during infusion
Incidence of delayed ADRs
delayed - within 24hrs post infusion
Incidence of all-cause mortality
Immediate and delayed - within 24hrs post infusion
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Iron Dextran
ACTIVE COMPARATORIron Sucrose
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
300mg in 250cc normal saline given over 2 hours
300mg in 250cc normal saline given over 2 hours
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 100
- To be receiving intravenous iron
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18
- Hemodialysis
- Previous exposure to intravenous iron
- Unable to provide written consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ian H Chin-Yee, MD, FRCPC
London Health Sciences Centre
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fiona E Ralley, MB ChB, FRCA
London Health Sciences Centre
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Cyrus C Hsia, MD,FRCPC
London Health Sciences Centre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2008
First Posted
January 15, 2008
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
March 3, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-02