PRIMAGE (Probiotics, Immunity and Ageing)
PRIMAGE
A Randomised, Controlled, Parallel Study to Determine the Immunomodulatory Effects of Pre- and Probiotics Upon the Immune Response to Influenza Vaccination in Young and Older Volunteers
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ageing dramatically affects immune function; this phenomenon is known as immunosenescence and partly explains the increased susceptibility for infection in older individuals. Vaccination is recommended to protect older people against influenza, but immunosenescence also reduces the efficacy of vaccination. Probiotics are beneficial bacteria, which can be consumed and which have a long and safe record of use in humans. Often they are taken together with prebiotics, which are carbohydrates that provide a food source for the beneficial bacteria when they reach the lower gut. There is particular interest in the positive influences of pre- and probiotics in older people, who are subject to alteration in gut microflora composition as well as immunosenescence. The PRIMAGE (Probiotics, immunity and ageing) study will examine the effect of a prebiotic and probiotic mix on the immune response to influenza vaccination in young and older subjects, and is funded by BBSRC DRINC. It will involve 60 young (18-35y) and 60 older (65-85y) subjects recruited from the local Reading community. Participants will take a pre- and probiotic mixture or a placebo for a total of 8 weeks. The probiotic is not currently commercially produced, but has been demonstrated to have particular ecological fitness and anti-pathogenic effects in the gastrointestinal tract in old age. A suitable prebiotic will be selected on the basis of ability to promote optimal growth and survival of this probiotic. After 4 weeks on the treatment, the subjects will receive an influenza vaccination. Blood, saliva and stool samples will be taken before treatment, and at 4, 6 and 8 weeks after commencement. The samples taken at 6 and 8 weeks will be used to assess the immune response to the vaccination. A wide range of immune parameters will be assessed, taking into account the age-related shifts in immune cell populations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2013
CompletedJuly 13, 2011
July 1, 2011
1.2 years
February 9, 2010
July 12, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The immune response to influenza vaccination among young and older adults
Serum vaccine-specific antibodies to the 2010-2011 influenza vaccine will be measured by hemagglutination assay.
4 weeks after vaccination
Secondary Outcomes (5)
The cellular and molecular basis for modulation of immune function by pre- and probiotics.
Assessed after 4 weeks of pre- and probiotic treatment
The cellular and molecular basis for modulation of immune function by pre- and probiotics.
Assessed after 6 weeks of pre- and probiotic treatment
The cellular and molecular basis for modulation of immune function by pre- and probiotics.
Assessed after 8 weeks of pre- and probiotic treatment
The modulation of the gut microbiota by pre- and probiotics.
Assessed after 4 weeks of pre- and probiotic treatment
The modulation of the gut microbiota by pre- and probiotics.
Assessed after 8 weeks of pre- and probiotic treatment
Study Arms (2)
Prebiotic and probiotic mix
EXPERIMENTALPrebiotic: 8g/day, will be selected on the basis of ability to promote optimal growth and survival of the probiotic (inulin, fructooligosaccharides \[FOS\], galactooligosaccharides\[GOS\] and xylooligosaccharides\[XOS\] will be tested). Probiotic: 10\^8 - 10\^9 live bacteria/day, bifidobacterium longum bv. infantis CCUG52486.
Maltodextrin/milk powder
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
The probiotic strain will be Bifidobacterium longum bv. infantis CCUG 52486 (10\^8 - 10\^9 live bacteria per day), which was originally isolated from healthy elderly subjects, and which has been demonstrated to have particular ecological fitness and anti-pathogenic effects in vitro. A suitable prebiotic (8g/day) will be selected on the basis of ability to promote optimal growth and survival of this probiotic (inulin, fructooligosaccharides \[FOS\], galactooligosaccharides\[GOS\] and xylooligosaccharides\[XOS\] will be tested).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Suitable study participants will be defined as:
- aged 18-35 (young cohort) or 65-85 (older cohort) men and women
- BMI 18.5 - 30 kg/m2
- good general health as determined by medical questionnaires and laboratory data from screening blood and urine sample (fasting glucose, ESR, FBC, liver function tests, renal profile, dipstick urinalysis)
- not pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy
You may not qualify if:
- allergy to the influenza vaccine
- HIV infection
- diabetes requiring any medication
- asplenia and other acquired or congenital immunodeficiencies
- any autoimmune disease
- malignancy
- cirrhosis
- connective tissue diseases
- current use of immunomodulating medication (including oral prednisone and inhaled steroids)
- self-reported symptoms of acute or recent infection (including use of antibiotics within last 3 months)
- taking lactulose or any other treatment for constipation
- alcoholism and drug misuse
- laboratory data which is outside the normal range for this age group AND outside the ranges specified in the SENIEUR protocol for ESR, FBC, renal profile, liver function tests, fasting glucose and dipstick urinalysis (Ligthart et al, 1984)
- Barthel Index score of \<16
- CIRS score of \<15.
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Reading
Reading, RG6 6AP, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Przemska-Kosicka A, Childs CE, Maidens C, Dong H, Todd S, Gosney MA, Tuohy KM, Yaqoob P. Age-Related Changes in the Natural Killer Cell Response to Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Are Not Influenced by a Synbiotic: a Randomised Controlled Trial. Front Immunol. 2018 Mar 22;9:591. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00591. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29662493DERIVEDEnani S, Przemska-Kosicka A, Childs CE, Maidens C, Dong H, Conterno L, Tuohy K, Todd S, Gosney M, Yaqoob P. Impact of ageing and a synbiotic on the immune response to seasonal influenza vaccination; a randomised controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2018 Apr;37(2):443-451. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
PMID: 28215759DERIVEDPrzemska-Kosicka A, Childs CE, Enani S, Maidens C, Dong H, Dayel IB, Tuohy K, Todd S, Gosney MA, Yaqoob P. Effect of a synbiotic on the response to seasonal influenza vaccination is strongly influenced by degree of immunosenescence. Immun Ageing. 2016 Mar 15;13:6. doi: 10.1186/s12979-016-0061-4. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 26985232DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Parveen Yaqoob
University of Reading
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2010
First Posted
February 10, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 13, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-07