Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Positron Emission Tomography (MRI/PET) in the Staging of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
The Efficacy of Coregistered Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Positron Emission Tomography (MRI/PET) in the Staging of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
1 other identifier
observational
272
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The accurate staging is an essential part for the treatment and prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whole body MR imaging proved to be effective in staging of NSCLC as much as PET/CT. And there were organs of strength for each modality in the detection of metastasis. Therefore, integrated approach using whole body MR and PET would be more beneficial for the accurate staging of lung cancer with improved diagnostic efficacies and reduced radiation exposure. The aim of this project is to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of side-by-side reading of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging/ positron emission tomography (MRI/PET) and to compare with that of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB MRI) alone and that of integrated PET/CT in determining the stage of NSCLC. Patients with pathologically-proven NSCLC will be prospectively enrolled, if they are considered as surgical candidates for the treatment of lung cancer through conventional methods of staging, i.e. history taking, physical examination, blood tests, bronchoscopy, and enhanced chest CT scans. PET/CT will be routinely performed for the staging of lung cancer in our institution. For the purpose of this study, whole body MRI will be performed for these patients within 3 days from the date of acquisition of PET/CT. The results of TNM staging from each modality will be collected prospectively and their efficacies can be calculated based on the reference standards. Reference standards of T and N staging will be surgically confirmed. And M staging can be confirmed by biopsy, other imaging modalities, or follow-up more than 6 months. Diagnostic efficacies of coregistered MRI/PET can be evaluated with the comparison from the consecutive two-arm enrollment with random assignment of control group and study group as follows:
- control group: routine staging work-up with chest CT, PET/CT, and brain MRI
- study group: routine staging work-up plus whole body MRI for Coregistered MRI/PET
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2011
CompletedDecember 29, 2011
December 1, 2011
February 8, 2010
December 25, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Study Arms (2)
control group
routine staging work-up with chest CT, PET/CT, and brain MRI
study group
routine staging work-up plus whole body MRI for Coregistered MRI/PET
Eligibility Criteria
Patient under the suspicion of lung cancer or Patients with NSCLC proved at pathologic examination
You may qualify if:
- Patient with solitary pulmonary nodule under the suspicion of lung cancer
- Patients with NSCLC proved at pathologic examination will do PETCT as a routine staging work-up.
You may not qualify if:
- patients with contraindication for the MR scan such as metalic device or claustrophobia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Yi CA, Lee KS, Lee HY, Kim S, Kwon OJ, Kim H, Choi JY, Kim BT, Hwang HS, Shim YM. Coregistered whole body magnetic resonance imaging-positron emission tomography (MRI-PET) versus PET-computed tomography plus brain MRI in staging resectable lung cancer: comparisons of clinical effectiveness in a randomized trial. Cancer. 2013 May 15;119(10):1784-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28000. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
PMID: 23423920DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kyung Soo Lee, Prof.
Samsung Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2010
First Posted
February 9, 2010
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 29, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-12