High(Deadlift) Versus Low Intensity Motor Control Exercises on Low Back Pain
Effects of High(Deadlift) Versus Low Intensity Motor Control Exercises on Patients With Peripherally Mediated Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
70
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate and compare the effects of high-intensity (deadlift) versus low-intensity motor control exercises on selfrated pain, function and symptoms on patients with peripherally mediated pain
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 low-back-pain
Started Jan 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 low-back-pain
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedMarch 8, 2013
March 1, 2013
2 months
January 20, 2010
March 7, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Selfrated function, symptoms and pain-rating
8 weeks, 6 month, 12 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Functional capacity
8 weeks, 6 months
Interventions
12 treatment sessions over a 8 week period is planned for the high intensity motor control exercise.
12 sessions of low intensity motor control exercises over 8 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- low back pain over 3 month
- the pain must originate locally from the lowe back and be nociceptive
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Luleå Tekniska Universitetlead
- Umeå Universitycollaborator
- Norrlandsklinikencollaborator
- County Council of Norrbotten, Swedencollaborator
Related Publications (2)
Aasa B, Berglund L, Michaelson P, Aasa U. Individualized low-load motor control exercises and education versus a high-load lifting exercise and education to improve activity, pain intensity, and physical performance in patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Feb;45(2):77-85, B1-4. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5021.
PMID: 25641309DERIVEDBerglund L, Aasa B, Hellqvist J, Michaelson P, Aasa U. Which Patients With Low Back Pain Benefit From Deadlift Training? J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Jul;29(7):1803-11. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000837.
PMID: 25559899DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kerstin Öhrling, As professor
Luleå Tekniska Universitet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2010
First Posted
February 3, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
March 8, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-03