NCT00937365

Brief Summary

This study compares three treatments for low back pain that started during pregnancy. The study hypothesizes that exercise, spinal manipulation, and a mind-body technique called neuroemotional technique (NET) equally affect pain intensity and disability associated with pregnancy-related low back pain. The study also hypothesizes that pain intensity and disability levels do not influence maternal heart rate variability (a measure of stress) and intrauterine attachment (a measure of relationship quality). Ten women will additionally provide blood and salivary oxytocin samples during pregnancy and periodically for three months after birth. These women and their babies will also be videotaped playing for 5 minutes at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months postpartum.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 low-back-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2009

Typical duration for phase_2 low-back-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2009

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 10, 2009

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 13, 2009

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

December 18, 2019

Status Verified

December 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

July 10, 2009

Last Update Submit

December 16, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

PregnancyPainLow back painPubic symphysis painCAMComplementary & Alternative MedicineExerciseChiropracticSpinal manipulationAdjustmentsNeuroemotional techniqueMind bodyMind body therapyAttachmentMaternal Fetal relationshipIntrauterine attachmentHeart rate variabilityVASVisual analog scaleRoland Morris Disability Index

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Roland Morris Disability Index

    Last study visit prior to birth

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain Visual Analog Scale

    Last Study Visit Before Birth

Study Arms (3)

Exercise

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Specific strengthening exercises demonstrated to improve pregnancy-related low back pain are taught to participants of this arm. Additionally, each participant will be evaluated and additional exercises will be prescribed relevant to her particular needs. Study participants of this arm are asked to perform the exercises at home at least once a day. Exercise is recorded in a diary. Participants follow the same study visit schedule as the two other arms.

Behavioral: Exercise

Spinal Manipulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Women randomized to this arm will be evaluated for spinal subluxations and, if appropriate, treated with chiropractic manipulation. Type of manipulation is determined by presentation. Woman may be manipulated with high velocity low amplitude thrust, blocking, activator, or other appropriate means of manipulating.

Procedure: Spinal Manipulation

Neuroemotional technique (NET)

EXPERIMENTAL

Neuroemotional technique (NET) is a mind-body technique which combines elements of chiropractic medicine, Chinese medicine, and behavioral psychology. Muscle response testing, a form of functional neurology, and visceral somatic reflexes are used to ascertain whether the pain or dysfunction experienced by the participant has an emotional component. If an emotional component is present, it is identified and the original "triggering" occurrence is identified. The participant creates a snapshot of that original occurrence and while she holds that image in her mind spinal levels which innervate the associated organ are adjusted.

Procedure: Neuroemotional Technique (NET)

Interventions

ExerciseBEHAVIORAL

Study visits follow the normal prenatal care schedule (once monthly until 28 weeks, twice monthly until 36 weeks, weekly thereafter). Additional study visits may be necessary if the pain is too intense and requires additional visits.

Also known as: pelvic tilts, stretch, strengthen, glut squeeze
Exercise

Study visits follow the normal prenatal care schedule (once monthly until 28 weeks, twice monthly until 36 weeks, weekly thereafter). Additional study visits may be necessary if the pain is too intense and requires additional visits.

Also known as: SMT, CMT, chiropractic manipulative therapy, OMT, osteopathic manipulative therapy, adjustment
Spinal Manipulation

Study visits follow the normal prenatal care schedule (once monthly until 28 weeks, twice monthly until 36 weeks, weekly thereafter). Additional study visits may be necessary if the pain is too intense and requires additional visits.

Also known as: NET, Mind-body therapy
Neuroemotional technique (NET)

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 49 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy
  • years old
  • Pregnant with a singleton
  • Low back pain began during pregnancy and has lasted more than one week
  • Low back pain is reproducible with palpation

You may not qualify if:

  • Health conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, cancer, thyroid condition etc.
  • Pain radiates below knee
  • Cannot read English
  • Plans to move away from Portland area during pregnancy
  • Not willing to be randomized to one of the three arms of the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Benarroch EE. Pain-autonomic interactions: a selective review. Clin Auton Res. 2001 Dec;11(6):343-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02292765.

    PMID: 11794714BACKGROUND
  • Borg-Stein J, Dugan SA, Gruber J. Musculoskeletal aspects of pregnancy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Mar;84(3):180-92. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000156970.96219.48.

    PMID: 15725792BACKGROUND
  • Brage S, Sandanger I, Nygard JF. Emotional distress as a predictor for low back disability: a prospective 12-year population-based study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 15;32(2):269-74. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251883.20205.26.

    PMID: 17224825BACKGROUND
  • Depledge J, McNair PJ, Keal-Smith C, Williams M. Management of symphysis pubis dysfunction during pregnancy using exercise and pelvic support belts. Phys Ther. 2005 Dec;85(12):1290-300.

    PMID: 16305268BACKGROUND
  • Dipietro JA, Irizarry RA, Costigan KA, Gurewitsch ED. The psychophysiology of the maternal-fetal relationship. Psychophysiology. 2004 Jul;41(4):510-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00187.x.

    PMID: 15189474BACKGROUND
  • Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Kominski GF, Yu F, Chiang LM. A randomized trial of chiropractic and medical care for patients with low back pain: eighteen-month follow-up outcomes from the UCLA low back pain study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 15;31(6):611-21; discussion 622. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000202559.41193.b2.

    PMID: 16540862BACKGROUND
  • Mogren I. Perceived health, sick leave, psychosocial situation, and sexual life in women with low-back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(6):647-56. doi: 10.1080/00016340600607297.

    PMID: 16752254BACKGROUND
  • Padua L, Caliandro P, Aprile I, Pazzaglia C, Padua R, Calistri A, Tonali P. Back pain in pregnancy: 1-year follow-up of untreated cases. Eur Spine J. 2005 Mar;14(2):151-4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0712-6. Epub 2004 May 15.

    PMID: 15759172BACKGROUND
  • Gartner JG. Thymic involution with loss of Hassall's corpuscles mimicking thymic dysplasia in a child with transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease. Pediatr Pathol. 1991 May-Jun;11(3):449-56. doi: 10.3109/15513819109064780.

    PMID: 1866363BACKGROUND
  • Stuber KJ, Smith DL. Chiropractic treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain: a systematic review of the evidence. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Jul-Aug;31(6):447-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.06.009.

    PMID: 18722200BACKGROUND
  • Wadhwa PD. Psychoneuroendocrine processes in human pregnancy influence fetal development and health. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005 Sep;30(8):724-43. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.02.004. Epub 2005 Apr 25.

    PMID: 15919579BACKGROUND
  • Peterson CD, Haas M, Gregory WT. A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of exercise, spinal manipulation, and neuro emotional technique for the treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain. Chiropr Man Therap. 2012 Jun 13;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-18.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back PainPainMotor Activity

Interventions

ExerciseManipulation, SpinalManipulation, OsteopathicMind-Body Therapies

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Motor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal ManipulationsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTherapeuticsRehabilitationComplementary Therapies

Study Officials

  • Thomas Gregory, MD

    Oregon Health and Science University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2009

First Posted

July 13, 2009

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion

April 1, 2012

Study Completion

April 1, 2012

Last Updated

December 18, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-12

Locations